ACI Cisco

August 28, 2022

by Matt Conran: The Visual Age Publications

Cisco ACI Components

In today's rapidly evolving technological landscape, organizations are constantly seeking innovative solutions to streamline their network infrastructure. Enter Cisco ACI Networks, a game-changing technology that promises to redefine networking as we know it. In this blog post, we will explore the key features and benefits of Cisco ACI Networks, shedding light on how it is transforming the way businesses design, deploy, and manage their network infrastructure.

Cisco ACI, short for Application Centric Infrastructure, is an advanced networking solution that brings together physical and virtual environments under a single, unified policy framework. By providing a holistic approach to network provisioning, automation, and orchestration, Cisco ACI Networks enable organizations to achieve unprecedented levels of agility, efficiency, and scalability.

Simplified Network Management: Cisco ACI Networks simplify network management by abstracting the underlying complexity of the infrastructure. With a centralized policy model, administrators can define and enforce network policies consistently across the entire network fabric, regardless of the underlying hardware or hypervisor.

Enhanced Security: Security is a top concern for any organization, and Cisco ACI Networks address this challenge head-on. By leveraging microsegmentation and integration with leading security platforms, ACI Networks provide granular control and visibility into network traffic, helping organizations mitigate potential threats and adhere to compliance requirements.

Scalability and Flexibility: The dynamic nature of modern business demands a network infrastructure that can scale effortlessly and adapt to changing requirements. Cisco ACI Networks offer unparalleled scalability and flexibility, allowing businesses to seamlessly expand their network footprint, add new services, and deploy applications with ease.

Data Center Virtualization: Cisco ACI Networks have revolutionized data center virtualization by providing a unified fabric that spans physical and virtual environments. This enables organizations to achieve greater operational efficiency, optimize resource utilization, and simplify the deployment of virtualized workloads.

Multi-Cloud Connectivity: In the era of hybrid and multi-cloud environments, connecting and managing disparate cloud services can be a daunting task. Cisco ACI Networks facilitate seamless connectivity between on-premises data centers and various public and private clouds, ensuring consistent network policies and secure communication across the entire infrastructure.

Cisco ACI Networks offer a paradigm shift in network infrastructure, empowering organizations to build agile, secure, and scalable networks tailored to their specific needs. With its comprehensive feature set, simplified management, and seamless integration with virtual and cloud environments, Cisco ACI Networks are poised to shape the future of networking. Embrace this transformative technology, and unlock a world of possibilities for your organization.

Matt Conran

Highlights: Cisco ACI Components

The ACI Fabric

Cisco ACI is a software-defined networking (SDN) solution that integrates with software and hardware. With the ACI, we can create software policies and use hardware for forwarding, an efficient and highly scalable approach offering better performance. The hardware for ACI is based on the Cisco Nexus 9000 platform product line. The APIC centralized policy controller drives the software, which stores all configuration and statistical data.

–The Cisco Nexus Family–

To build the ACI underlay, you must exclusively use the Nexus 9000 family of switches. You can choose from modular Nexus 9500 switches or fixed 1U to 2U Nexus 9300 models. Specific models and line cards are dedicated to the spine function in ACI fabric; others can be used as leaves, and some can be used for both purposes. You can combine various leaf switches inside one fabric without any limitations.

a) Cisco ACI Fabric: Cisco ACI’s foundation lies in its fabric, which forms the backbone of the entire infrastructure. The ACI fabric comprises leaf switches, spine switches, and the application policy infrastructure controller (APIC). Each component ensures a scalable, agile, and resilient network.

b) Leaf Switches: Leaf switches serve as the access points for endpoints within the ACI fabric. They provide connectivity to servers, storage devices, and other network devices. With their high port density and advanced features, such as virtual port channels (vPCs) and fabric extenders (FEX), leaf switches enable efficient and flexible network designs.

c) Spine Switches: Spine switches serve as the core of the ACI fabric, providing high-bandwidth connectivity between the leaf switches. They use a non-blocking, multipath forwarding mechanism to ensure optimal traffic flow and eliminate bottlenecks. With their modular design and support for advanced protocols like Ethernet VPN (EVPN), spine switches offer scalability and resiliency.

d) Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC): At the heart of Cisco ACI is the APIC, a centralized management and policy control plane. The APIC acts as a single control point, simplifying network operations and enabling policy-based automation. It provides a comprehensive view of the entire fabric, allowing administrators to define and enforce policies across the network.

e) Integration with Virtualization and Cloud Environments: Cisco ACI seamlessly integrates with virtualization platforms such as VMware vSphere and Microsoft Hyper-V and cloud environments like Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure. This integration enables consistent policy enforcement and visibility across physical, virtual, and cloud infrastructures, enhancing agility and simplifying operations.

–ACI Architecture: Spine and Leaf–

To be used as ACI spines or leaves, Nexus 9000 switches must be equipped with powerful Cisco CloudScale ASICs manufactured using 16-nm technology. The following figure shows the Cisco ACI based on the Nexus 9000 series. Cisco Nexus 9300 and 9500 platform switches support Cisco ACI. As a result, organizations can use them as spines or leaves to utilize an automated, policy-based systems management approach fully.

Diagram: Cisco ACI Components. Source is Cisco

**Hardware-based Underlay**

Server virtualization helped by decoupling workloads from the hardware, making the compute platform more scalable and agile. However, the server is not the main interconnection point for network traffic. So, we need to look at how we could virtualize the network infrastructure similarly to the agility gained from server virtualization.

**Mapping Network Endpoints**

This is carried out with software-defined networking and overlays that could map network endpoints and be spun up and down as needed without human intervention. In addition, the SDN architecture includes an SDN controller and an SDN network that enables an entirely new data center topology.

**Specialized Forwarding Chips**

In ACI, hardware-based underlay switching offers a significant advantage over software-only solutions due to specialized forwarding chips. Furthermore, thanks to Cisco’s ASIC development, ACI brings many advanced features, including security policy enforcement, microsegmentation, dynamic policy-based redirect (inserting external L4-L7 service devices into the data path), or detailed flow analytics—besides the vast performance and flexibility.

Related: For pre-information, you may find the following helpful:

Cisco ACI Components

Introduction to Leaf and Spine

The Cisco SDN ACI works with a Clos architecture, a fully meshed ACI network. Based on a spine leaf architecture. As a result, every Leaf is physically connected to every Spine, enabling traffic forwarding through non-blocking links. Physically, a leaf switch set creates a leaf layer attached to the spines in a full BIPARTITE graph. This means that each Leaf is connected to each Spine, and each Spine is connected to each Leaf.

The ACI uses a horizontally elongated Leaf and Spine architecture with one hop to every host in an entirely messed ACI fabric, offering good throughput and convergence needed for today’s applications.

The ACI fabric: Does Not Aggregate Traffic

A key point in the spine-and-leaf design is the fabric concept, like a stretch network. One of the core ideas around a fabric is that it does not aggregate traffic. This does increase data center performance along with a non-blocking architecture. With the spine-leaf topology, we are spreading a fabric across multiple devices.

Required: Increased Bandwidth Available

The result of the fabric is that each edge device has the total bandwidth of the fabric available to every other edge device. This is one big difference from traditional data center designs; we aggregate the traffic by either stacking multiple streams onto a single link or carrying the streams serially.

Challenge: Oversubscription

With the traditional 3-tier design, we aggregate everything at the core, leading to oversubscription ratios that degrade performance. With the ACI Leaf and Spine design, we spread the load across all devices with equidistant endpoints, allowing us to carry the streams parallel.

Required: Routed Multipathing

Then, we have horizontal scaling load balancing. Load balancing with this topology uses multipathing to achieve the desired bandwidth between the nodes. Even though this forwarding paradigm can be based on Layer 2 forwarding ( bridging) or Layer 3 forwarding ( routing), the ACI leverages a routed approach to the Leaf and Spine design, and we have Equal Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) for both Layer 2 and Layer 3 traffic.

Overlay and Underlay Design

Mapping Traffic:

So you may be asking how we can have Layer 3 routed core and pass Layer 2 traffic. This is done using the overlay, which can map different traffic types to other overlays. So, we can have Layer 2 traffic mapped to an overlay over a routed core.

L3 active-active links: ACI links between the Leaf and the Spine switches are L3 active-active links. Therefore, we can intelligently load balance and traffic steer to avoid issues. We don’t need to rely on STP to block links or involve STP in fixing the topology.

Challenge: IP – Identity & Location

When networks were first developed, there was no such thing as an application moving from one place to another while it was in use. So, the original architects of IP, the communication protocol used between computers, used the IP address to indicate both the identity of a device connected to the network and its location on the network. Today, in the modern data center, we need to be able to communicate with an application or application tier, no matter where it is.

Required: Overlay Encapsulation

One day, it may be in location A and the next in location B, but its identity, which we communicate with, is the same on both days. An overlay is when we encapsulate an application’s original message with the location to which it needs to be delivered before sending it through the network. Once it arrives at its final destination, we unwrap it and deliver the original message as desired.

The identities of the devices (applications) communicating are in the original message, and the locations are in the encapsulation, thus separating the place from the identity. This wrapping and unwrapping is done on a per-packet basis and, therefore, must be done quickly and efficiently.

Overlay and Underlay Components

The Cisco SDN ACI has an overlay and underlay concept, which forms a virtual overlay solution. The role of the underlay is to glue together devices so the overlay can work and be built on top. So, the overlay, which is VXLAN, runs on top of the underlay, which is IS-IS. In the ACI, the IS-IS protocol provides the routing for the overlay, which is why we can provide ECMP from the Leaf to the Spine nodes. The routed underlay provides an ECMP network where all leaves can access Spine and have the same cost links.

ACI overlay — Diagram: Overlay. Source Cisco

Underlay & Overlay Interaction

Example:

Let’s take a simple example to illustrate how this is done. Imagine that application App-A wants to send a packet to App-B. App-A is located on a server attached to switch S1, and App-B is initially on switch S2. When App-A creates the message, it will put App-B as the destination and send it to the network; when the message is received at the edge of the network, whether a virtual edge in a hypervisor or a physical edge in a switch, the network will look up the location of App-B in a “mapping” database and see that it is attached to switch S2.

It will then put the address of S2 outside of the original message. So, we now have a new message addressed to switch S2. The network will forward this new message to S2 using traditional networking mechanisms. Note that the location of S2 is very static, i.e., it does not move, so using traditional mechanisms works just fine.

Upon receiving the new message, S2 will remove the outer address and thus recover the original message. Since App-B is directly connected to S2, it can easily forward the message to App-B. App-A never had to know where App-B was located, nor did the network’s core. Only the edge of the network, specifically the mapping database, had to know the location of App-B. The rest of the network only had to see the location of switch S2, which does not change.

Let’s now assume App-B moves to a new location switch S3. Now, when App-A sends a message to App-B, it does the same thing it did before, i.e., it addresses the message to App-B and gives the packet to the network. The network then looks up the location of App-B and finds that it is now attached to switch S3. So, it puts S3’s address on the message and forwards it accordingly. At S3, the message is received, the outer address is removed, and the original message is delivered as desired.

App-A did not track App-B’s movement at all. App-B’s address identified It, while the switch’s address, S2 or S3, identified its location. App-A can communicate freely with App-B no matter where It is located, allowing the system administrator to place App-B in any area and move it as desired, thus achieving the flexibility needed in the data center.

Multicast Distribution Tree (MDT)

We have a Multicast Distribution Tree MDT tree on top that is used to forward multi-destination traffic without having loops. The Multicast distribution tree is dynamically built to send flood traffic for specific protocols. Again, it does this without creating loops in the overlay network. The tunnels created for the endpoints to communicate will have tunnel endpoints. The tunnel endpoints are known as the VTEP. The VTEP addresses are assigned to each Leaf switch from a pool that you specify in the ACI startup and discovery process.

Normalize the transports

VXLAN tunnels in the ACI fabric normalize the transports in the ACI network. Therefore, traffic between endpoints can be delivered using the VXLAN tunnel, resulting in any transport network regardless of the device connecting to the fabric.

So, using VXLAN in the overlay enables any network, and you don’t need to configure anything special on the endpoints for this to happen. The endpoints that connect to the ACI fabric do not need special software or hardware. The endpoints send regular packets to the leaf nodes they are connected to directly or indirectly. As endpoints come online, they send traffic to reach a destination.

Bridge Domains and VRF

Therefore, the Cisco SDN ACI under the hood will automatically start to build the VXLAN overlay network for you. The VXLAN network is based on the Bridge Domain (BD), or VRF ACI constructs deployed to the leaf switches. The Bridge Domain is for Layer 2, and the VRF is for Layer 3. So, as devices come online and send traffic to each other, the overlay will grow in reachability in the Bridge Domain or the VRF.

Direct host routing for endoints

Routing within each tenant, VRF is based on host routing for endpoints directly connected to the Cisco ACI fabric. For IPv4, the host routing is based on the /32, giving the ACI a very accurate picture of the endpoints. Therefore, we have exact routing in the ACI. In conjunction, we have a COOP database that runs on the Spines and offers remarkably optimized fabric to know where all the endpoints are located.

To facilitate this, every node in the fabric has a TEP address, and we have different types of TEPs depending on the device’s role. The Spine and the Leaf will have TEP addresses but will differ from each other.

The VTEP and PTEP

The Leaf’s nodes are the Virtual Tunnel Endpoints (VTEP), which are also known as the physical tunnel endpoints (PTEP) in ACI. These PTEP addresses represent the “WHERE” in the ACI fabric where an endpoint lives. Cisco ACI uses a dedicated VRF and a subinterface of the uplinks from the Leaf to the Spines as the infrastructure to carry VXLAN traffic. In Cisco ACI terminology, the transport infrastructure for VXLAN traffic is known as Overlay-1, which is part of the tenant “infra.”

The Spine TEP

The Spines also have a PTEP and an additional proxy TEP, which are used for forwarding lookups into the mapping database. The Spines have a global view of where everything is, which is held in the COOP database synchronized across all Spine nodes. All of this is done automatically for you.

Anycast IP Addressing

For this to work, the Spines have an Anycast IP address known as the Proxy TEP. The Leaf can use this address if they do not know where an endpoint is, so they ask the Spine for any unknown endpoints, and then the Spine checks the COOP database. This brings many benefits to the ACI solution, especially for traffic optimizations and reducing flooded traffic in the ACI. Now, we have an optimized fabric for better performance.

The ACI optimizations

Mouse and elephant flow

This provides better performance for load balancing different flows. For example, in most data centers, we have latency-sensitive flows, known as mouse flows, and long-lived bandwidth-intensive flows, known as elephant flows.

The ACI has more precisely load-balanced traffic using algorithms that optimize mouse and elephant flows and distribute traffic based on flow lets: flow let load-balancing. Within a Leaf, Spine latency is low and consistent from port to port.

The max latency of a packet from one port to another in the architecture is the same regardless of the network size. So you can scale the network without degrading performance. Scaling is often done on a POD-by-POD basis. For more extensive networks, each POD would be its Leaf and Spine network.

ARP optimizations: Anycast gateways

The ACI comes by default with a lot of traffic optimizations. Firstly, instead of using an ARP and broadcasting across the network, that can hamper performance. The Leaf can assume that the Spine will know where the destination is ( and it does via the COOP database ), so there is no need to broadcast to everyone to find a destination.

If the Spine knows where the endpoint is, it will forward the traffic to the other Leaf. If not, it will drop it.

Fabric anycast addressing

This again adds performance benefits to the ACI solution as the table sizes on the Leaf switches can be kept smaller than they would if they needed to know where all the destinations were, even if they were not or never needed to communicate with them. On the Leaf, we have an Anycast address too.

These fabric Anycast addresses are available for Layer 3 interfaces. On the Leaf ToR, we can establish an SVI that uses the same MAC address on every ToR; therefore, when an endpoint needs to route to a ToR, it doesn’t matter which ToR you use. The Anycast Address is spread across all ToR leaf switches.

Pervasive gateway

Now we have predictable latency to the first hop, and you will use the local route VRF table within that ToR instead of traversing the fabric to a different ToR. This is the Pervasive Gateway feature that is used on all Leaf switches. The Cisco ACI has many advanced networking features, but the pervasive gateway is my favorite. It does take away all the configuration mess we had in the past.

ACI Cisco: Integrations

Routing Control Platform

Then came along Cisco SDN ACI, the ACI Cisco, which operates differently from the traditional data center with an application-centric infrastructure. The Cisco application-centric infrastructure achieves resource elasticity with automation through standard policies for data center operations and consistent policy management across multiple on-premises and cloud instances.

Extending & Integrating the fabric

What makes the Cisco ACI interesting is its several vital integrations. I’m not talking about extending the data center with multi-pod and multi-site, for example, with AlgoSec, Cisco AppDynamics, and SD-WAN. AlgoSec enables secure application delivery and policy across hybrid network estates, while AppDynamic lives in a world of distributed systems Observability. SD-WAN enabled path performance per application with virtual WANs.

Cisco Multi-Pod Design

Cisco ACI Multi-Pod is part of the “Single APIC Cluster / Single Domain” family of solutions, as a single APIC cluster is deployed to manage all the interconnected ACI networks. These separate ACI networks are named “pods,” Each looks like a regular two-tier spine-leaf topology. The same APIC cluster can manage several pods, and to increase the resiliency of the solution, the various controller nodes that make up the cluster can be deployed across different pods.

ACI Cisco and AlgoSec

With AlgoSec integrated with the Cisco ACI, we can now provide automated security policy change management for multi-vendor devices and risk and compliance analysis. The AlgoSec Security Management Solution for Cisco ACI extends ACI’s policy-driven automation to secure various endpoints connected to the Cisco SDN ACI fabric.

These simplify network security policy management across on-premises firewalls, SDNs, and cloud environments. They also provide visibility into ACI’s security posture, even across multi-cloud environments.

ACI Cisco and AppDynamics

Then, with AppDynamics, we are heading into Observability and controllability. Now, we can correlate app health and network for optimal performance, deep monitoring, and fast root-cause analysis across complex distributed systems with numbers of business transactions that need to be tracked.

This will give your teams complete visibility of your entire technology stack, from your database servers to cloud-native and hybrid environments. In addition, AppDynamics works with agents that monitor application behavior in several ways. We will examine the types of agents and how they work later in this post.

ACI Cisco and SD-WAN

SD-WAN brings a software-defined approach to the WAN. These enable a virtual WAN architecture to leverage transport services such as MPLS, LTE, and broadband internet services. So, SD-WAN is not a new technology; its benefits are well known, including improving application performance, increasing agility, and, in some cases, reducing costs.

The Cisco ACI and SD-WAN integration makes active-active data center design less risky than in the past. The following figures give a high-level overview of the Cisco ACI and SD-WAN integration. For pre-information generic to SD-WAN, go here: SD-WAN Tutorial

The Cisco SDN ACI with SD-WAN integration helps ensure an excellent application experience by defining application Service-Level Agreement (SLA) parameters. Cisco ACI releases 4.1(1i) and adds support for WAN SLA policies. This feature enables admins to apply pre-configured policies to specify the packet loss, jitter, and latency levels for the tenant traffic over the WAN.

When you apply a WAN SLA policy to the tenant traffic, the Cisco APIC sends the pre-configured policies to a vManage controller. The vManage controller, configured as an external device manager that provides SDWAN capability, chooses the best WAN link that meets the loss, jitter, and latency parameters specified in the SLA policy.

Openshift and Cisco SDN ACI

OpenShift Container Platform (formerly known as OpenShift Enterprise) or OCP is Red Hat’s offering for the on-premises private platform as a service (PaaS). OpenShift is based on the Origin open-source project and is a Kubernetes distribution, the defacto for container-based virtualization. The foundation of the OpenShift networking SDN is based on Kubernetes and, therefore, shares some of the same networking technology along with some enhancements, such as the OpenShift route construct.

Other data center integrations

Cisco SDN ACI has another integration with Cisco DNA Center/ISE that maps user identities consistently to endpoints and apps across the network, from campus to the data center. Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) provides policy-based automation from the edge to the data center and the cloud.

Cisco SD-Access provides automated end-to-end segmentation to separate user, device, and application traffic without redesigning the network. This integration will enable customers to use standard policies across Cisco SD-Access and Cisco ACI, simplifying customer policy management using Cisco technology in different operational domains.

OpenShift and Cisco ACI

OpenShift does this with an SDN layer and enhances Kubernetes networking to create a virtual network across all the nodes. It is made with the Open Switch standard. For OpenShift SDN, this pod network is established and maintained by the OpenShift SDN, configuring an overlay network using a virtual switch called the OVS bridge. This forms an OVS network that gets programmed with several OVS rules. The OVS is a popular open-source solution for virtual switching.

OpenShift SDN plugin

We mentioned that you could tailor the virtual network topology to suit your networking requirements, which can be determined by the OpenShift SDN plugin and the SDN model you select. With the default OpenShift SDN, several modes are available. This level of SDN mode you choose is concerned with managing connectivity between applications and providing external access to them. Some modes are more fine-grained than others. The Cisco ACI plugins offer the most granular.

Integrating ACI and OpenShift platform

The Cisco ACI CNI plugin for the OpenShift Container Platform provides a single, programmable network infrastructure, enterprise-grade security, and flexible micro-segmentation possibilities. The APIC can provide all networking needs for the workloads in the cluster. Kubernetes workloads become fabric endpoints, like Virtual Machines or Bare Metal endpoints.

Cisco ACI CNI Plugin

The Cisco ACI CNI plugin extends the ACI fabric capabilities to OpenShift clusters to provide IP Address Management, networking, load balancing, and security functions for OpenShift workloads. In addition, the Cisco ACI CNI plugin connects all OpenShift Pods to the integrated VXLAN overlay provided by Cisco ACI.

Cisco SDN ACI and AppDynamics

AppDynamis overview

So, an application requires multiple steps or services to work. These services may include logging in and searching to add something to a shopping cart. These services invoke various applications, web services, third-party APIs, and databases, known as business transactions.

The user’s critical path

A business transaction is the essential user interaction with the system and is the customer’s critical path. Therefore, business transactions are the things you care about. If they start to go, your system will degrade. So, you need ways to discover your business transactions and determine if there are any deviations from baselines. This should also be automated, as learning baseline and business transitions in deep systems is nearly impossible using the manual approach.

So, how do you discover all these business transactions?

AppDynamics automatically discovers business transactions and builds an application topology map of how the traffic flows. A topology map can view usage patterns and hidden flows, acting as a perfect feature for an Observability platform.

AppDynamic topology

AppDynamics will automatically discover the topology for all of your application components. It can then build a performance baseline by capturing metrics and traffic patterns. This allows you to highlight issues when services and components are slower than usual.

AppDynamics uses agents to collect all the information it needs. The agent monitors and records the calls that are made to a service. This is from the entry point and follows executions along its path through the call stack.

Types of Agents for Infrastructure Visibility

If the agent is installed on all critical parts, you can get information about that specific instance, which can help you build a global picture. So we have an Application Agent, Network Agent, and Machine Agent for Server visibility and Hardware/OS.

App Agent: This agent will monitor apps and app servers, and example metrics will be slow transitions, stalled transactions, response times, wait times, block times, and errors.
Network Agent: This agent monitors the network packets, TCP connection, and TCP socket. Example metrics include performance impact Events, Packet loss, and retransmissions, RTT for data transfers, TCP window size, and connection setup/teardown.
Machine Agent Server Visibility: This agent monitors the number of processes, services, caching, swapping, paging, and querying. Example Metrics include hardware/software interrupts, virtual memory/swapping, process faults, and CPU/DISK/Memory utilization by the process.
Machine Agent: Hardware/OS – disks, volumes, partitions, memory, CPU. Example metrics: CPU busy time, MEM utilization, and pieces file.

Automatic establishment of the baseline

A baseline is essential, a critical step in your monitoring strategy. Doing this manually is hard, if not impossible, with complex applications. It is much better to have this done automatically. You must automatically establish the baseline and alert yourself about deviations from it.

This will help you pinpoint the issue faster and resolve it before it can be affected. Platforms such as AppDynamics can help you here. Any malicious activity can be seen from deviations from the security baseline and performance issues from the network baseline.

Summary: Cisco ACI Components

In the ever-evolving world of networking, organizations are constantly seeking ways to enhance their infrastructure’s performance, security, and scalability. Cisco ACI (Application Centric Infrastructure) presents a cutting-edge solution to these challenges. By unifying physical and virtual environments and leveraging network automation, Cisco ACI revolutionizes how networks are built and managed.

Understanding Cisco ACI Architecture

At the core of Cisco ACI lies a robust architecture that enables seamless integration between applications and the underlying network infrastructure. The architecture comprises three key components:

1. Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC):

The APIC serves as the centralized management and policy engine of Cisco ACI. It provides a single point of control for configuring and managing the entire network fabric. Through its intuitive graphical user interface (GUI), administrators can define policies, allocate resources, and monitor network performance.

2. Nexus Switches:

Cisco Nexus switches form the backbone of the ACI fabric. These high-performance switches deliver ultra-low latency and high throughput, ensuring optimal data transfer between applications and the network. Nexus switches provide the necessary connectivity and intelligence to enable the automation and programmability features of Cisco ACI.

3. Application Network Profiles:

Application Network Profiles (ANPs) are a fundamental aspect of Cisco ACI. ANPs define the policies and characteristics required for specific applications or application groups. By encapsulating network, security, and quality of service (QoS) policies within ANPs, administrators can streamline the deployment and management of applications.

The Power of Network Automation

One of the most compelling aspects of Cisco ACI is its ability to automate network provisioning, configuration, and monitoring. Through the APIC’s powerful automation capabilities, network administrators can eliminate manual tasks, reduce human errors, and accelerate the deployment of applications. With Cisco ACI, organizations can achieve greater agility and operational efficiency, enabling them to rapidly adapt to evolving business needs.

Security and Microsegmentation with Cisco ACI

Security is a paramount concern for every organization. Cisco ACI addresses this by providing robust security features and microsegmentation capabilities. With microsegmentation, administrators can create granular security policies at the application level, effectively isolating workloads and preventing lateral movement of threats. Cisco ACI also integrates with leading security solutions, enabling seamless network enforcement and threat intelligence sharing.

Conclusion

Cisco ACI is a game-changer in the realm of network automation and infrastructure management. Its innovative architecture, coupled with powerful automation capabilities, empowers organizations to build agile, secure, and scalable networks. By leveraging Cisco ACI’s components, businesses can unlock new levels of efficiency, flexibility, and performance, ultimately driving growth and success in today’s digital landscape.

BGP SDN – Centralized Forwarding

November 28, 2015

by Matt Conran Blog

BGP SDN

The networking landscape has significantly shifted towards Software-Defined Networking (SDN) in recent years. With its ability to centralize network management and streamline operations, SDN has emerged as a game-changing technology. One of the critical components of SDN is Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), a routing protocol that plays a vital role in connecting different autonomous systems. In this blog post, we will explore the concept of BGP SDN and its implications for the future of networking.

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a dynamic routing protocol that facilitates the exchange of routing information between different networks. It enables the establishment of connections and the exchange of network reachability information across autonomous systems. BGP is the glue that holds the internet together, ensuring that data packets are delivered efficiently across various networks.

Scalability and Flexibility: BGP SDN empowers network administrators with the ability to scale their networks effortlessly. By leveraging BGP's inherent scalability and SDN's programmability, network expansion becomes a seamless process. Additionally, the flexibility provided by BGP SDN allows for the customization of routing policies, enabling network administrators to adapt to changing network requirements.

Traffic Engineering and Optimization: Another significant advantage of BGP SDN is its capability to perform traffic engineering and optimization. With granular control over routing decisions, network administrators can efficiently manage traffic flow, ensuring optimal utilization of network resources. This results in improved network performance, reduced congestion, and enhanced user experience.

Dynamic Path Selection: BGP SDN enables dynamic path selection based on various parameters, such as network congestion, link quality, and cost. This dynamic nature of BGP SDN allows for intelligent and adaptive routing decisions, ensuring efficient data transmission and load balancing across the network.

Policy-Based Routing: BGP SDN allows network administrators to define routing policies based on specific criteria. This capability enables the implementation of fine-grained traffic management strategies, such as prioritizing certain types of traffic or directing traffic through specific paths. Policy-based routing enhances network control and enables the optimization of network performance for specific applications or user groups.

BGP SDN represents a significant leap forward in network management. By combining the robustness of BGP with the flexibility of SDN, organizations can unlock new levels of scalability, control, and optimization. Whether it's enhancing network performance, enabling dynamic path selection, or implementing policy-based routing, BGP SDN paves the way for a more efficient and agile network infrastructure.

Matt Conran

Highlights: BGP SDN

BGP SDN, which stands for Border Gateway Protocol Software-Defined Networking, combines the power of traditional BGP routing protocols with the flexibility and programmability of SDN. It enables network administrators to have granular control over their routing decisions and allows for dynamic and automated network provisioning.

**BGP SDN Centralized Forwarding**

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, network management and optimization have become more critical than ever. With the burgeoning demands for higher bandwidth, lower latency, and greater network reliability, traditional networking methods are increasingly finding themselves inadequate. This is where BGP SDN Centralized Forwarding comes into play, offering a revolutionary approach to network management by combining the strengths of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN).

**Understanding BGP and SDN**

Before delving into the centralized forwarding aspect, it’s crucial to understand the foundational components: BGP and SDN. BGP, a robust and mature protocol, has been the cornerstone of the internet’s routing infrastructure for decades. It is responsible for making core routing decisions and ensuring data packets find their way across the networks of different organizations. On the other hand, SDN is a modern paradigm that separates the control plane from the data plane, allowing for more agile and flexible network management. By integrating these two technologies, we can create a more efficient and manageable network.

**The Need for Centralized Forwarding**

Traditional BGP implementations operate in a distributed manner, which, while reliable, can lead to inefficiencies and complexities in network management. Centralized forwarding through SDN changes this by offering a holistic view and control over the network. This centralized approach allows network administrators to implement policies and changes from a single point, reducing complexities and potential errors. This is especially beneficial in large-scale networks where consistent and efficient routing decisions are imperative.

Key BGP SDN Considerations:

Enhanced Flexibility and Scalability: BGP SDN brings unmatched flexibility to network operators. By decoupling the control plane from the data plane, it allows for dynamic rerouting and network updates without disrupting the overall network operation. This flexibility also enables seamless scalability as networks grow or evolve over time.

Improved Network Performance and Efficiency: With BGP SDN, network administrators can optimize traffic flow by dynamically adjusting routing decisions based on real-time network conditions. This intelligent traffic engineering ensures efficient resource utilization, reduced latency, and improved overall network performance.

Simplified Network Management: By leveraging programmability, BGP SDN simplifies network management tasks. Network administrators can automate routine configuration changes, implement policies, and troubleshoot network issues more efficiently. This leads to significant time and cost savings.

Rapid Deployment of New Services: BGP SDN enables faster service deployment by allowing administrators to define routing policies and service chaining through software. This eliminates the need for manual configuration changes on individual network devices, reducing deployment time and potential human errors.

Improved Network Security: BGP SDN provides enhanced security features by allowing fine-grained control over network access and traffic routing. It enables the implementation of robust security policies, such as traffic isolation and encryption, to protect against potential threats.

BGP-based SDN

BGP SDN, also known as BGP-based SDN, is an approach that leverages the strengths of BGP and SDN to enhance network control and management. Unlike traditional networking architectures, where individual routers make routing decisions, BGP SDN centralizes the control plane, allowing for more efficient routing and dynamic network updates. By separating the control plane from the data plane, operators can gain greater visibility and control over their networks.

BGP SDN offers a range of features and benefits that make it an attractive choice for network operators. First, it provides enhanced scalability and flexibility, allowing networks to adapt to changing demands and traffic patterns. Second, operators can easily define and modify routing policies, ensuring optimal traffic distribution across the network.

Another notable feature is the ability to enable network programmability. Using APIs and controllers, network operators can dynamically provision and configure network services, making deploying new applications and services easier. This programmability also opens doors for automation and orchestration, simplifying network management and reducing operational costs.

Use Cases of BGP SDN: BGP SDN has found applications in various domains, from data centers to wide-area networks. In data centers, it enables efficient load balancing, traffic engineering, and rapid service deployment. It also allows for the creation of virtual networks, enabling secure multi-tenancy and resource isolation.

BGP SDN brings benefits such as traffic engineering and improved network resilience in wide-area networks. It enables dynamic path selection, optimizes traffic flows, and reduces congestion. Additionally, BGP SDN can enable faster network recovery during failures, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity.

BGP vs SDN:

BGP, also known as the routing protocol of the Internet, plays a vital role in facilitating communication between autonomous systems (AS). It enables the exchange of routing information and determines the best path for data packets to reach their destinations. With its robust and scalable design, BGP has become the go-to protocol for inter-domain routing.

SDN, on the other hand, is a paradigm shift in network architecture. SDN centralizes network management and allows for programmability and flexibility by decoupling the control plane from the forwarding plane. With SDN, network administrators can dynamically control network behavior through a centralized controller, simplifying network management and enabling rapid innovation.

Synergizing BGP and SDN

When BGP and SDN converge, the result is a potent combination that transcends the limitations of traditional networking. SDN’s centralized control plane empowers network operators to control BGP routing policies dynamically, optimizing traffic flow and enhancing network performance. By leveraging SDN controllers to manipulate BGP attributes, operators can quickly implement traffic engineering, load balancing, and security policies.

The Role of SDN:

In contrast to the decentralized control logic that underpins the construction of the Internet as a complex bundle of box-centric protocols and vertically integrated solutions, software-defined networking (SDN) advocates the separation of control logic from hardware and its centralization in software-based controllers. Introducing innovative applications and incorporating automatic and adaptive control into these fundamental tenets can ease network management and enhance user experience.

Recap Technology: EBGP over IBGP

EBGP, or External Border Gateway Protocol, is a routing protocol typically used between different autonomous systems (AS). It facilitates the exchange of routing information between these AS, allowing efficient data transmission across networks. EBGP’s primary characteristic is that it operates between routers in different AS, enabling interdomain routing.

IBGP, or Internal Border Gateway Protocol, operates within a single autonomous system (AS). It establishes peering relationships between routers within the same AS, ensuring efficient routing within the network. Unlike EBGP, IBGP does not involve exchanging routes between different AS; instead, it focuses on sharing routing information between routers within the same AS.

While both EBGP and IBGP serve to facilitate routing, there are crucial differences between them. One significant distinction lies in the scope of their operation. EBGP connects routers across different AS, making it ideal for interdomain routing. On the other hand, IBGP connects routers within the same AS, providing efficient intradomain routing.

EBGP is commonly used by internet service providers (ISPs) to exchange routing information with other ISPs, ensuring global reachability. It enables autonomous systems to learn about and select the best paths to reach specific destinations. IBGP, on the other hand, helps maintain synchronized routing information within an AS, preventing routing loops and ensuring efficient internal traffic flow.

Recap Technology: BGP Route Reflection

Understanding BGP Route Reflection

BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) is a crucial routing protocol in large-scale networks. However, route propagation can become cumbersome and resource-intensive in traditional BGP setups. BGP route reflection offers an elegant solution by reducing the number of full-mesh connections needed in a network.

By implementing BGP route reflection, network administrators can achieve significant advantages. Firstly, it reduces resource consumption by eliminating the need for every router to maintain full mesh connectivity. This leads to improved scalability and reduced overhead. Additionally, it enhances network stability and convergence time, ensuring efficient routing updates.

To implement BGP route reflection, several key steps need to be followed. Firstly, identify the routers that will act as route reflectors in the network. These routers should have sufficient resources to handle the increased routing information. Next, configure the route reflectors and their respective clients, ensuring proper peering relationships. Finally, monitor and fine-tune the route reflection setup to optimize performance.

Challenges to Networking

Over the past few years, there has been a growing demand for a new approach to networking to address the many issues associated with current networks. According to the SDN approach, networking operations can be simplified, network management can be optimized, and innovation and flexibility can be introduced.

According to Kim and Feamster (2013), four key reasons can be identified for the problems encountered in managing existing networks:

(1) Complex and low-level network configuration: Network configuration is a distributed task typically configured vendor-specific at the low level. Moreover, network operators constantly change configurations manually due to the rapid growth of the network and changing networking conditions, adding complexity and introducing additional configuration errors to the configuration process.

(2) Growing complexity and dynamic network state: networks are becoming increasingly complex and more extensive. Moreover, as mobile computing trends continue to develop and network virtualization (Bari et al. 2013; Alam et al. 2020) and cloud computing (Zhang et al. 2010; Sharkh et al. 2013; Shamshirband et al. 2020) become more prevalent, the networking environment becomes even more dynamic as hosts are constantly moving, arriving and departing due to the flexibility offered by virtual machine migration, which results in a rapid and significant change of traffic patterns and network conditions.

(3) Exposed complexity: today’s large-scale networks are complicated by distributed low-level network configuration interfaces that expose great complexity. Many control and management features are implemented in hardware, which generates this complexity.

(4) Heterogeneous: Current networks contain many heterogeneous network devices, including routers, switches, and middleboxes of various kinds. As a result, network management becomes more complex and inefficient because each appliance has its proprietary configuration tools.

Because legacy networks’ static, inflexible architecture is ill-suited to cope with today’s increasingly dynamic networking trends and meet modern users’ QoE expectations, network management is becoming increasingly challenging. As a result, complex, high-level policies must be adopted to adapt to current networking environments, and network operations must be automated to reduce the tedious work of low-level device configuration.

Traffic Engineering

Networks with multiple Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Autonomous Systems (ASNs) under the same administrative control implement traffic engineering with policy configurations at border edges. Policies are applied on multiple routers distributedly, which can be hard to manage and scale. Any per-prefix traffic engineering changes may need to occur on various devices and levels.

A new BGP Software-Defined Networking (SDN) solution introduced by P. Lapukhov and E. Nkposong proposes a centralized routing model. It introduces the concept of a BGP SDN controller, also known as an SDN BGP controller with a routing control platform. No protocol extensions or additional protocols are needed to implement the SDN architecture. BGP is employed to push down new routes and peers iBGP with all existing BGP routers.

BGP-only Network

A BGP-only network has many advantages, and this solution promotes a more stable Layer 3-only network, utilizing one control plane protocol – BGP. BGP captures topology discovery and links up/down events. BGP can push different information to different BGP speakers, while an IGP has to flood the same LSA throughout the IGP domain.

For additional pre-information, you may find the following helpful:

BGP SDN

BGP Peering Session Overview

In BGP terminology, a BGP neighbor relationship is called a peer relationship, unlike OSPF and EIGRP, which implement their transport mechanism. In place of TCP, BGP utilizes BGP TCP port 179 as its transport protocol. A BGP peering session can only be established between two routers after a TCP session has been established between them. Selecting a BGP session consists of establishing a TCP session and exchanging BGP-specific information to establish a BGP peering session.

A TCP session operates on a client/server model. On a specific TCP port number, the server listens for connection attempts. Upon hearing the server’s port number, the client attempts to establish a TCP session. Next, the client sends a TCP synchronization (TCP SYN) message to the listening server to indicate that it is ready to send data.

Upon receiving the client’s request, the server responds with a TCP synchronization acknowledgment (TCP SYN-ACK) message. Finally, the client acknowledges receipt of the SYN-ACK packet by sending a simple TCP acknowledgment (TCP ACK). TCP segments can now be sent from the client to the server. As part of this process, TCP performs a three-way handshake.

Diagram: BGP explained. The source is IPcisco.

So, how does BGP work? BGP is a path-vector protocol that stores routes in the Routing Information Bases (RIBs). The RIB within a BGP speaker consists of three parts:

The Adj-RIB-In,
The Loc-RIB,
The Adj-RIB-Out.

The Adj-RIB-In stores routing information learned from the inbound UPDATE messages advertised by peers to the local router. The routes in the Adj-RIB-In define routes that are available to the path decision process. The Loc-RIB contains routing information the local router selected after applying policy to the routing information in the Adj-RIB-In.

The Emergence of BGP in SDN:

Software-defined networking (SDN) introduces a paradigm shift in managing and operating networks. Traditionally, network devices such as routers and switches were responsible for handling routing decisions. However, with the advent of SDN, the control plane is decoupled from the data plane, allowing for centralized management and control of the network.

BGP plays a crucial role in the SDN architecture by acting as a control protocol that enables communication between the controller and the network devices. It provides the intelligence and flexibility required for orchestrating network policies and routing decisions in an SDN environment.

Layer-2 and Layer-3 Technologies

Traditional forwarding routing protocols and network designs comprise a mix of Layer 2 and 3 technologies. Topologies resemble trees with different aggregation levels, commonly known as access, aggregation, and core. IP routing is deployed at the top layers, while Layer 2 is in the lower tier to support VM mobility and other applications requiring Layer 2 VLANs to communicate.

Fully routed networks are more stable as they confine the Layer 2 broadcast domain to certain areas. Layer 2 is segmented and confined to a single switch, usually used to group ports. Routed designs run Layer 3 to the Top of the Rack (ToR), and VLANs should not span ToR switches. As data centers grow in size, the stability of IP has been preferred over layer 2 protocols.

A key point: Traffic patterns

Traditional traffic patterns leave the data center, known as north-to-south traffic flow. In this case, conventional tree-like designs are sufficient. Upgrades consist of scale-out mechanisms, such as adding more considerable links or additional line cards. However, today’s applications, such as Hadoop clusters, require much more server-to-server traffic, known as east-to-west traffic flow.

Scaling up traditional tree topologies to match these traffic demands is possible but not an optimum way to run your network. A better choice is to scale your data center horizontally with a CLOS topology ( leaf and spine ), not a tree topology.

Leaf and spine topologies permit equidistant endpoints and horizontal scaling, resulting in a perfect combination for optimum east-to-west traffic patterns. So, what layer 3 protocol do you use for your routing design? An Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP), such as ISIS or OSPF? Or maybe BGP? BGP’s robustness makes it a popular Layer 3 protocol for reducing network complexity.

How BGP works with BGP SDN: Centralized forwarding

What is BGP protocol in networking? Regarding internal data structures, BGP is less complex than a link-state IGP. Instead of forming adjacency maintenance and controls, it runs all its operations over Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and uses TCP’s robust transport mechanism.

BGP has considerably less flooding overhead than IGPs, with a single flooding domain propagation scope. For these reasons, BGP is great for reducing network complexity and is selected as this SDN solution’s singular control plane mechanism.

Peter has written a draft called “Centralized Routing Control in BGP Networks Using Link-State Abstraction,” which discusses the use case of BGP for centralized routing control in the network.

The main benefit of the architecture is centralized rather than distributed control. There is no need to configure policies on multiple devices. All changes are made with an API in the controller.

A link-state map

The network looks like a collection of BGP ASN, and the entire routing is done with BGP only. First, BGP builds a link-state map of the network in the controller memory.

Then, they use BGP to discover the topology and notice link-up and link-down events. Instead of installing a 5-tuple that can install flows based on the entire IP header, the BGP SDN solution offers destination-based forwarding only. For additional granularity, implement BGP flow spec, RFC 55745, entitled “Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules.”

Routing Control Platform

The proposed method was inspired by the Routing Control Platform (RCP). The RCP platform uses a controller-based function and selects BGP routes for the routers in an AS using a complete view of the available routes and IGP topology. The RCP platform has properties similar to those of the BGP SDN solution.

Both run iBGP peers to all routers in the network and influence the default topology by changing the controller and pushing down new routes. However, a significant difference is that the RCP has additional IGP peerings. It’s not a BGP-only network. BGP SDN promotes a single control plane of BGP without any IGPs.

BGP detects health, builds a link-state map, and represents the network to a third-party application as multiple topologies. You can map prefixes to different topologies and change link costs from the API.

Multi-Topology view

The agent builds the link-state database and presents a multi-topology view of this data to the client applications. You may clone this topology and give certain links higher costs, mapping some prefixes to this new non-default topology. The controller pushes new routes down with BGP.

The peering is based on iBGP, so new routes are set with a better Local Preference, enabling them to be selected higher in the BGP path decision process. It is possible to do this with eBGP, but iBGP can be more accessible. With iBGP, you don’t need to care about the next hops.

BGP and OpenFlow

What is OpenFlow? BGP works like OpenFlow and pushes down the forwarding information. It populates routes in the forwarding table. Instead of using BGP in a distributed fashion, they centralize it. One main benefit of using BGP over OpenFlow is that you can shut the controller down, and regular BGP operation continues on the network.

But if you transition to an OpenFlow configuration, you cannot roll back as quickly as you could with BGP. Using BGP inband has great operational benefits. It is a great design by P. Lapukhov. There is no need to deploy BGP-LS or any other enhancements to BGP.

Closing Points on BGP SDN

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN). BGP has long been the backbone of internet routing, while SDN is redefining how we manage and configure networks. But what happens when these two paradigms intersect? The convergence of BGP and SDN centralized forwarding presents an exciting frontier in network management, offering enhanced flexibility and control.

BGP is the protocol that holds the internet together by deciding the best paths for data to travel from source to destination across autonomous systems. It’s like the GPS for the internet, ensuring data packets find their way. However, traditional BGP lacks agility, often requiring manual configuration and offering limited adaptability to rapid network changes. This rigidity can lead to inefficiencies and delays, particularly in large-scale networks.

Enter SDN, a transformative approach that decouples the network control plane from the data plane, allowing for centralized management of network resources. SDN introduces a layer of abstraction that provides network administrators with the flexibility to program and configure network behavior dynamically, using software-based controllers. This means that network policies can be adjusted on the fly, responding swiftly to changing demands and conditions.

Combining BGP with SDN centralized forwarding brings the best of both worlds. SDN controllers can leverage BGP for routing decisions while maintaining centralized control over network policies and configurations. This synergy allows for automated, real-time optimization of routing paths, better resource allocation, and improved network resilience. In this hybrid model, networks become more efficient, scalable, and responsive to the needs of modern applications and services.

While the integration of BGP and SDN centralized forwarding offers numerous advantages, it also presents challenges. Compatibility issues between legacy systems and modern SDN architectures can arise, requiring careful planning and execution. Additionally, security considerations must be addressed to protect the centralized control plane from potential threats. However, the potential benefits—such as enhanced performance, reduced operational costs, and greater adaptability—make overcoming these hurdles worthwhile.

Summary: BGP SDN

In the ever-evolving networking world, two key technologies have emerged as game-changers: Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN). In this blog post, we delved into the intricacies of these powerful tools, exploring their functionalities, benefits, and impact on the networking landscape.

Understanding BGP

BGP, an exterior gateway protocol, plays a crucial role in enabling communication between different autonomous systems on the internet. It allows routers to exchange information about network reachability, facilitating efficient routing decisions. With its robust path selection mechanisms and ability to handle large-scale networks, BGP has become the de facto protocol for inter-domain routing.

Exploring SDN

SDN, on the other hand, represents a paradigm shift in network architecture. SDN centralizes network management and provides a programmable and flexible infrastructure by decoupling the control plane from the data plane. SDN empowers network administrators to dynamically configure and manage network resources through controllers and open APIs, leading to greater automation, scalability, and agility.

The Synergy Between BGP and SDN

While BGP and SDN are distinct technologies, they are not mutually exclusive. They can complement each other to enhance network performance and efficiency. SDN can leverage BGP’s routing capabilities to optimize traffic flows and improve network utilization. Conversely, BGP can benefit from SDN’s centralized control, enabling faster and more adaptive routing decisions.

Benefits and Challenges

The adoption of BGP and SDN brings numerous benefits to network operators. BGP provides stability, scalability, and fault tolerance in inter-domain routing, ensuring reliable connectivity across the internet. SDN offers simplified network management, quick provisioning, and the ability to implement security policies at scale. However, implementing these technologies may also present challenges, such as complex configurations, interoperability issues, and security concerns that need to be addressed.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, BGP and SDN have revolutionized the networking landscape, offering unprecedented control, flexibility, and efficiency. BGP’s role as the backbone of inter-domain routing, combined with SDN’s programmability and centralized management, paves the way for a new era of networking. As technology advances, a deep understanding of BGP and SDN will be essential for network professionals to adapt and thrive in this rapidly evolving domain.

What is OpenFlow

September 25, 2014

by Matt Conran Blog

What is OpenFlow?

In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, network management and data flow control have become critical for businesses of all sizes. OpenFlow is one technology that has gained significant attention and is transforming how networks are managed. In this blog post, we will delve into the concept of OpenFlow, its advantages, and its implications for network control.

OpenFlow is an open-standard communications protocol that separates the control and data planes in a network architecture. It allows network administrators to have direct control over the behavior of network devices, such as switches and routers, by utilizing a centralized controller.

Traditional network architectures follow a closed model, where network devices make independent decisions on forwarding packets. On the other hand, OpenFlow introduces a centralized control plane that provides a global view of the network and allows administrators to define network policies and rules from a centralized location.

OpenFlow operates by establishing a secure channel between the centralized controller and the network switches. The controller is responsible for managing the flow tables within the switches, defining how traffic should be forwarded based on predefined rules and policies. This separation of control and data planes allows for dynamic network management and facilitates the implementation of innovative network protocols.

One of the key advantages of OpenFlow is its ability to simplify network management. By centralizing control, administrators can easily configure and manage the entire network from a single point of control. This reduces complexity and enhances the scalability of network infrastructure. Additionally, OpenFlow enables network programmability, allowing for the development of custom networking applications and services tailored to specific requirements.

OpenFlow plays a crucial role in network virtualization, as it allows for the creation and management of virtual networks on top of physical infrastructure. By abstracting the underlying network, OpenFlow empowers organizations to optimize resource utilization, improve security, and enhance network performance. It opens doors to dynamic provisioning, isolation, and efficient utilization of network resources.

Matt Conran

Highlights: What is OpenFlow?

How does OpenFlow work?

1: OpenFlow allows network controllers to determine the path of network packets in a network of switches. There is a difference between switches and controllers. With separate control and forwarding, traffic management can be more sophisticated than access control lists (ACLs) and routing protocols.

2: An OpenFlow protocol allows switches from different vendors, often with proprietary interfaces and scripting languages, to be managed remotely. Software-defined networking (SDN) is considered to be enabled by OpenFlow by its inventors.

3: With OpenFlow, Layer 3 switches can add, modify, and remove packet-matching rules and actions remotely. By doing so, routing decisions can be made periodically or ad hoc by the controller and translated into rules and actions with a configurable lifespan, which are then deployed to the switch’s flow table, where packets are forwarded at wire speed for the duration of the rule.

The Role of OpenFlow Controllers

If the switch cannot match packets, they can be sent to the controller. The controller can modify existing flow table rules or deploy new rules to prevent a structural traffic flow. It may even forward the traffic itself if the switch is instructed to forward packets rather than just their headers.

OpenFlow uses Transport Layer Security (TLS) over Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). Switches wishing to connect should listen on TCP port 6653. In earlier versions of OpenFlow, port 6633 was unofficially used. The protocol is mainly used between switches and controllers.

### Origins of OpenFlow

The inception of OpenFlow can be traced back to the early 2000s when researchers at Stanford University sought to create a more versatile and programmable network architecture. Traditional networking relied heavily on static and proprietary hardware configurations, which limited innovation and adaptability. OpenFlow emerged as a solution to these challenges, offering a standardized protocol that decouples the network control plane from the data plane. This separation allows for centralized control and dynamic adjustment of network traffic, fostering innovation and agility in network design.

### How OpenFlow Works

At its core, the OpenFlow protocol facilitates communication between network devices and a centralized SDN controller. It does this by using a series of flow tables within network switches, which are programmed by the controller. These flow tables dictate how packets should be handled, whether they are forwarded to a destination, dropped, or modified in some way. By leveraging OpenFlow, network administrators can deploy updates, optimize performance, and troubleshoot issues with unprecedented speed and precision, all from a single point of control.

Introducing SDN

Recent changes and requirements have driven networks and network services to become more flexible, virtualization-aware, and API-driven. One major trend affecting the future of networking is software-defined networking ( SDN ). The software-defined architecture aims to extract the entire network into a single switch.

Software-defined networking (SDN) is an evolving technology defined by the Open Networking Foundation ( ONF ). It involves the physical separation of the network control plane from the forwarding plane, where a control plane controls several devices. This differs significantly from traditional IP forwarding that you may have used in the past.

The Core Concepts of SDN

At its heart, Software-Defined Networking decouples the network control plane from the data plane, allowing network administrators to manage network services through abstraction of lower-level functionality. This separation enables centralized network control, which simplifies the management of complex networks. The control plane makes decisions about where traffic is sent, while the data plane forwards traffic to the selected destination. This approach allows for a more flexible, adaptable network infrastructure.

The activities around OpenFlow

Even though OpenFlow has received a lot of industry attention, programmable networks and decoupled control planes (control logic) from data planes have been around for many years. To enhance ATM, Internet, and mobile networks’ openness, extensibility, and programmability, the Open Signaling (OPENING) working group held workshops in 1995. A working group within the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) developed GSMP to control label switches based on these ideas. June 2002 marked the official end of this group, and GSMPv3 was published.

Data and control plane

Therefore, SDN separates the data and control plane. The main driving body behind software-defined networking (SDN) is the Open Networking Foundation ( ONF ). Introduced in 2008, the ONF is a non-profit organization that wants to provide an alternative to proprietary solutions that limit flexibility and create vendor lock-in.

The insertion of the ONF allowed its members to run proof of concepts on heterogeneous networking devices without requiring vendors to expose their software’s internal code. This creates a path for an open-source approach to networking and policy-based controllers.

Knowledge Check: Data & Control Plane

### Data Plane: The Highway for Your Data

The data plane, often referred to as the forwarding plane, is responsible for the actual movement of packets of data from source to destination. Imagine it as a network’s highway, where data travels at high speed. This component operates at the speed of light, handling massive amounts of data with minimal delay. It’s designed to process packets quickly, ensuring that the information arrives where it needs to be without interruption.

### Control Plane: The Brain Behind the Operation

While the data plane acts as the highway, the control plane is the brain that orchestrates the flow of traffic. It makes decisions about routing, managing the network topology, and controlling the data plane’s operations. The control plane uses protocols to determine the best paths for data and to update routing tables as needed. It’s responsible for ensuring that the network operates efficiently, adapting to changes, and maintaining optimal performance.

### Interplay Between Data and Control Planes

The synergy between the data and control planes is what enables modern networks to function effectively. The control plane provides the intelligence and decision-making necessary to guide the data plane. This interaction ensures that data packets take the best possible paths, reducing latency and maximizing throughput. As networks evolve, the lines between these planes may blur, but their distinct roles remain pivotal.

### Real-World Applications and Innovations

The concepts of data and control planes are not just theoretical—they have practical applications in technologies such as Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV). These innovations allow for greater flexibility and scalability in managing network resources, offering businesses the agility needed to adapt to changing demands.

Building blocks: SDN Environment

As a fundamental building block of an SDN deployment, the controller, the SDN switch (for example, an OpenFlow switch), and the interfaces are present in the controller to communicate with forwarding devices, generally the southbound interface (OpenFlow) and the northbound interface (the network application interface).

In an SDN, switches function as basic forwarding hardware, accessible via an open interface, with the control logic and algorithms offloaded to controllers. Hybrid (OpenFlow-enabled) and pure (OpenFlow-only) OpenFlow switches are available.

OpenFlow switches rely entirely on a controller for forwarding decisions, without legacy features or onboard control. Hybrid switches support OpenFlow as well, in addition to traditional operation and protocols. Today, hybrid switches are the most common type of commercial switch. A flow table performs packet lookup and forwarding in an OpenFlow switch.

### The Role of the OpenFlow Controller

The OpenFlow controller is the brain of the SDN, orchestrating the flow of data across the network. It communicates with the network devices using the OpenFlow protocol to dictate how packets should be handled. The controller’s primary function is to make decisions on the path data packets should take, ensuring optimal network performance and resource utilization. This centralization of control allows for dynamic network configuration, paving the way for innovative applications and services.

### OpenFlow Switches: The Workhorses of the Network

While the controller is the brain, OpenFlow switches are the workhorses, executing the instructions they receive. These switches operate at the data plane, where they forward packets based on the rules set by the controller. Each switch maintains a flow table that matches incoming packets to particular actions, such as forwarding or dropping the packet. This separation of control and data planes is what sets SDN apart from traditional networking, offering unparalleled flexibility and control.

### Flow Tables: The Heart of OpenFlow Switches

Flow tables are the core component of OpenFlow switches, dictating how packets are handled. Each entry in a flow table consists of match fields, counters, and a set of instructions. Match fields identify the packets that should be affected by the rule, counters track the number of packets and bytes that match the entry, and instructions define the actions to be taken. This modular approach allows for precise traffic management and is essential for implementing advanced network policies.

OpenFlow Table & Routing Tables

### What is an OpenFlow Flow Table?

OpenFlow is a protocol that allows network controllers to interact with the forwarding plane of network devices like switches and routers. At the heart of OpenFlow is the flow table. This table contains a set of flow entries, each specifying actions to take on packets that match a particular pattern. Unlike traditional routing tables, which rely on predefined paths and protocols, OpenFlow flow tables provide flexibility and programmability, allowing dynamic changes in how packets are handled based on real-time network conditions.

### Understanding Routing Tables

Routing tables are a staple of traditional networking, used by routers to determine the best path for forwarding packets to their final destinations. These tables consist of a list of network destinations, with associated metrics that help in selecting the most efficient route. Routing protocols such as OSPF, BGP, and RIP are employed to maintain and update these tables, ensuring that data flows smoothly across the interconnected web of networks. While reliable, routing tables are less flexible compared to OpenFlow flow tables, as changes in network traffic patterns require updates to routing protocols and configurations.

Example of a Routing Table

### Key Differences Between OpenFlow Flow Table and Routing Table

The primary distinction between OpenFlow flow tables and routing tables lies in their approach to network management. OpenFlow flow tables are dynamic and programmable, allowing for real-time adjustments and fine-grained control over traffic flows. This makes them ideal for environments where network agility and customization are paramount. Conversely, routing tables offer a more static and predictable method of packet forwarding, which can be beneficial in stable networks where consistency and reliability are prioritized.

### Use Cases: When to Use Each

OpenFlow flow tables are particularly advantageous in software-defined networking (SDN) environments, where network administrators need to quickly adapt to changing conditions and optimize traffic flows. They are well-suited for data centers, virtualized networks, and scenarios requiring high levels of automation and scalability. On the other hand, traditional routing tables are best used in established networks with predictable traffic patterns, such as those found in enterprise or service provider settings, where reliability and stability are key.

You may find the following useful for pre-information:

What is OpenFlow?

OpenFlow was the first protocol of the Software-Defined Networking (SDN) trend and is the only protocol that allows the decoupling of a network device’s control plane from the data plane. In most straightforward terms, the control plane can be thought of as the brains of a network device. On the other hand, the data plane can be considered hardware or application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) that perform packet forwarding.

Numerous devices also support running OpenFlow in a hybrid mode, meaning OpenFlow can be deployed on a given port, virtual local area network (VLAN), or even within a regular packet-forwarding pipeline such that if there is not a match in the OpenFlow table, then the existing forwarding tables (MAC, Routing, etc.) are used, making it more analogous to Policy Based Routing (PBR).

What is SDN?

Despite various modifications to the underlying architecture and devices (such as switches, routers, and firewalls), traditional network technologies have existed since the inception of networking. Using a similar approach, frames and packets have been forwarded and routed in a limited manner, resulting in low efficiency and high maintenance costs. Consequently, the architecture and operation of networks need to evolve, resulting in SDN.

By enabling network programmability, SDN promises to simplify network control and management and allow innovation in computer networking. Network engineers configure policies to respond to various network events and application scenarios. They can achieve the desired results by manually converting high-level policies into low-level configuration commands.

Often, minimal tools are available to accomplish these very complex tasks. Controlling network performance and tuning network management are challenging and error-prone tasks.

A modern network architecture consists of a control plane, a data plane, and a management plane; the control and data planes are merged into a machine called Inside the Box. To overcome these limitations, programmable networks have emerged.

How OpenFlow Works:

At the core of OpenFlow is the concept of a flow table, which resides in each OpenFlow-enabled switch. The flow table contains match-action rules defining how incoming packets should be processed and forwarded. The centralized controller determines these rules and communicates using the OpenFlow protocol with the switches.

When a packet arrives at an OpenFlow-enabled switch, it is first matched against the rules in the flow table. If a match is found, the corresponding action is executed, including forwarding the packet, dropping it, or sending it to the controller for further processing. This decoupling of the control and data planes allows for flexible and programmable network management.

What is OpenFlow SDN?

The main goal of SDN is to separate the control and data planes and transfer network intelligence and state to the control plane. These concepts have been exploited by technologies like Routing Control Platform (RCP), Secure Architecture for Network Enterprise (SANE), and, more recently, Ethane.

In addition, there is often a connection between SDN and OpenFlow. The Open Networking Foundation (ONF) is responsible for advancing SDN and standardizing OpenFlow, whose latest version is 1.5.0.

An SDN deployment starts with these building blocks.

For communication with forwarding devices, the controller has the SDN switch (for example, an OpenFlow switch), the SDN controller, and the interfaces. An SDN deployment is based on two basic building blocks: a southbound interface (OpenFlow) and a northbound interface (the network application interface).

As the control logic and algorithms are offloaded to a controller, switches in SDNs may be represented as basic forwarding hardware. Switches that support OpenFlow come in two varieties: pure (OpenFlow-only) and hybrid (OpenFlow-enabled).

Pure OpenFlow switches do not have legacy features or onboard control for forwarding decisions. A hybrid switch can operate with both traditional protocols and OpenFlow. Hybrid switches make up the majority of commercial switches available today. In an OpenFlow switch, a flow table performs packet lookup and forwarding.

OpenFlow reference switch

The OpenFlow protocol and interface allow OpenFlow switches to be accessed as essential forwarding elements. A flow-based SDN architecture like OpenFlow simplifies switching hardware. Still, it may require additional forwarding tables, buffer space, and statistical counters that are difficult to implement in traditional switches with integrated circuits tailored to specific applications.

There are two types of switches in an OpenFlow network: hybrids (which enable OpenFlow) and pores (which only support OpenFlow). OpenFlow is supported by hybrid switches and traditional protocols (L2/L3). OpenFlow switches rely entirely on a controller for forwarding decisions and do not have legacy features or onboard control.

Hybrid switches are the majority of the switches currently available on the market. This link must remain active and secure because OpenFlow switches are controlled over an open interface (through a TCP-based TLS session). OpenFlow is a messaging protocol that defines communication between OpenFlow switches and controllers, which can be viewed as an implementation of SDN-based controller-switch interactions.

Openflow switch — Diagram: OpenFlow switch. The source is cable solution.

Identify the Benefits of OpenFlow

Application-driven routing. Users can control the network paths.	The networks paths.A way to enhance link utilization.
An open solution for VM mobility. No VLAN reliability.	A means to traffic engineer without MPLS.
A solution to build very large Layer 2 networks.	A way to scale Firewalls and Load Balancers.
A way to configure an entire network as a whole as opposed to individual entities.	A way to build your own encryption solution. Off-the-box encryption.
A way to distribute policies from a central controller.	Customized flow forwarding. Based on a variety of bit patterns.
A solution to get a global view of the network and its state. End-to-end visibility.	A solution to use commodity switches in the network. Massive cost savings.

The following table lists the Software Networking ( SDN ) benefits and the problems encountered with existing control plane architecture:

Identify the benefits of OpenFlow and SDN	Problems with the existing approach
Faster software deployment.	Large scale provisioning and orchestration.
Programmable network elements.	Limited traffic engineering ( MPLS TE is cumbersome )
Faster provisioning.	Synchronized distribution policies.
Centralized intelligence with centralized controllers.	Routing of large elephant flows.
Decisions are based on end-to-end visibility.	Qos and load based forwarding models.
Granular control of flows.	Ability to scale with VLANs.
Decreases the dependence on network appliances like load balancers.

A key point: The lack of a session layer in the TCP/IP stack

Regardless of the hype and benefits of SDN, neither OpenFlow nor other SDN technologies address the real problems of the lack of a session layer in the TCP/IP protocol stack. The problem is that the client’s application ( Layer 7 ) connects to the server’s IP address ( Layer 3 ), and if you want to have persistent sessions, the server’s IP address must remain reachable.

This session’s persistence and the ability to connect to multiple Layer 3 addresses to reach the same device is the job of the OSI session layer. The session layer provides the services for opening, closing, and managing a session between end-user applications. In addition, it allows information from different sources to be correctly combined and synchronized.

The problem is the TCP/IP reference module does not consider a session layer, and there is none in the TCP/IP protocol stack. SDN does not solve this; it gives you different tools to implement today’s kludges.

Control and data plane

When we identify the benefits of OpenFlow, let us first examine traditional networking operations. Traditional networking devices have a control and forwarding plane, depicted in the diagram below. The control plane is responsible for setting up the necessary protocols and controls so the data plane can forward packets, resulting in end-to-end connectivity. These roles are shared on a single device, and the fast packet forwarding ( data path ) and the high-level routing decisions ( control path ) occur on the same device.

What is OpenFlow | SDN separates the data and control plane?

Control plane

The control plane is part of the router architecture and is responsible for drawing the network map in routing. When we mention control planes, you usually think about routing protocols, such as OSPF or BGP. But in reality, the control plane protocols perform numerous other functions, including:

Connectivity management ( BFD, CFM )	Interface state management ( PPP, LACP )
Service provisioning ( RSVP for InServ or MPLS TE)	Topology and reachability information exchange ( IP routing protocols, IS-IS in TRILL/SPB )
Adjacent device discovery via HELLO mechanism	ICMP

Control plane protocols run over data plane interfaces to ensure “shared fate” – if the packet forwarding fails, the control plane protocol fails as well.

Most control plane protocols ( BGP, OSPF, BFD ) are not data-driven. A BGP or BFD packet is never sent as a direct response to a data packet. There is a question mark over the validity of ICMP as a control plane protocol. The debate is whether it should be classed in the control or data plane category.

Some ICMP packets are sent as replies to other ICMP packets, and others are triggered by data plane packets, i.e., data-driven. My view is that ICMP is a control plane protocol that is triggered by data plane activity. After all, the “C” is ICMP does stand for “Control.”

Data plane

The data path is part of the routing architecture that decides what to do when a packet is received on its inbound interface. It is primarily focused on forwarding packets but also includes the following functions:

ACL logging	Netflow accounting
NAT session creation	NAT table maintenance

The data forwarding is usually performed in dedicated hardware, while the additional functions ( ACL logging, Netflow accounting ) typically happen on the device CPU, commonly known as “punting.” The data plane for an OpenFlow-enabled network can take a few forms.

However, the most common, even in the commercial offering, is the Open vSwitch, often called the OVS. The Open vSwitch is an open-source implementation of a distributed virtual multilayer switch. It enables a switching stack for virtualization environments while supporting multiple protocols and standards.

Software-defined networking changes the control and data plane architecture.

The concept of SDN separates these two planes, i.e., the control and forwarding planes are decoupled. This allows the networking devices in the forwarding path to focus solely on packet forwarding. An out-of-band network uses a separate controller ( orchestration system ) to set up the policies and controls. Hence, the forwarding plane has the correct information to forward packets efficiently.

In addition, it allows the network control plane to be moved to a centralized controller on a server instead of residing on the same box carrying out the forwarding. Moving the intelligence ( control plane ) of the data plane network devices to a controller enables companies to use low-cost, commodity hardware in the forwarding path. A significant benefit is that SDN separates the data and control plane, enabling new use cases.

A centralized computation and management plane makes more sense than a centralized control plane.

The controller maintains a view of the entire network and communicates with Openflow ( or, in some cases, BGP with BGP SDN ) with the different types of OpenFlow-enabled network boxes. The data path portion remains on the switch, such as the OVS bridge, while the high-level decisions are moved to a separate controller. The data path presents a clean flow table abstraction, and each flow table entry contains a set of packet fields to match, resulting in specific actions ( drop, redirect, send-out-port ).

When an OpenFlow switch receives a packet it has never seen before and doesn’t have a matching flow entry, it sends the packet to the controller for processing. The controller then decides what to do with the packet.

Applications could then be developed on top of this controller, performing security scrubbing, load balancing, traffic engineering, or customized packet forwarding. The centralized view of the network simplifies problems that were harder to overcome with traditional control plane protocols.

A single controller could potentially manage all OpenFlow-enabled switches. Instead of individually configuring each switch, the controller can push down policies to multiple switches simultaneously—a compelling example of many-to-one virtualization.

Now that SDN separates the data and control plane, the operator uses the centralized controller to choose the correct forwarding information per-flow basis. This allows better load balancing and traffic separation on the data plane. In addition, there is no need to enforce traffic separation based on VLANs, as the controller would have a set of policies and rules that would only allow traffic from one “VLAN” to be forwarded to other devices within that same “VLAN.”

The advent of VXLAN

With the advent of VXLAN, which allows up to 16 million logical entities, the benefits of SDN should not be purely associated with overcoming VLAN scaling issues. VXLAN already does an excellent job with this. It does make sense to deploy a centralized control plane in smaller independent islands; in my view, it should be at the edge of the network for security and policy enforcement roles. Using Openflow on one or more remote devices is easy to implement and scale.

It also decreases the impact of controller failure. If a controller fails and its sole job is implementing packet filters when a new user connects to the network, the only affecting element is that the new user cannot connect. If the controller is responsible for core changes, you may have interesting results with a failure. New users not being able to connect is bad, but losing your entire fabric is not as bad.

Spanning tree VXLAN — Diagram: Loop prevention. Source is Cisco

A traditional networking device runs all the control and data plane functions. The control plane, usually implemented in the central CPU or the supervisor module, downloads the forwarding instructions into the data plane structures. Every vendor needs communications protocols to bind the two planes together to download forward instructions.

Therefore, all distributed architects need a protocol between control and data plane elements. The protocol binding this communication path for traditional vendor devices is not open-source, and every vendor uses its proprietary protocol (Cisco uses IPC—InterProcess Communication ).

Openflow tries to define a standard protocol between the control plane and the associated data plane. When you think of Openflow, you should relate it to the communication protocol between the traditional supervisors and the line cards. OpenFlow is just a low-level tool.

OpenFlow is a control plane ( controller ) to data plane ( OpenFlow enabled device ) protocol that allows the control plane to modify forwarding entries in the data plane. It enables SDN to separate the data and control planes.

Proactive versus reactive flow setup

OpenFlow operations have two types of flow setups: Proactive and Reactive.

With Proactive, the controller can populate the flow tables ahead of time, similar to a typical routing. However, the packet-in event never occurs by pre-defining your flows and actions ahead of time in the switch’s flow tables. The result is all packets are forwarded at line rate. With Reactive, the network devices react to traffic, consult the OpenFlow controller, and create a rule in the flow table based on the instruction. The problem with this approach is that there can be many CPU hits.

The following table outlines the critical points for each type of flow setup:

Proactive flow setup	Reactive flow setup
Works well when the controller is emulating BGP or OSPF.	Used when no one can predict when and where a new MAC address will appear.
The controller must first discover the entire topology.	Punts unknown packets to the controller. Many CPU hits.
Discover endpoints ( MAC addresses, IP addresses, and IP subnets )	Compute forwarding paths on demand. Not off the box computation.
Compute off the box optimal forwarding.	Install flow entries based on actual traffic.
Download flow entries to the data plane switches.	Has many scalability concerns such as packet punting rate.
No data plane controller involvement with the exceptions of ARP and MAC learning. Line-rate performance.	Not a recommended setup.

Hop-by-hop versus path-based forwarding

The following table illustrates the key points for the two types of forwarding methods used by OpenFlow: hop-by-hop forwarding and path-based forwarding:

Hop-by-hop Forwarding	Path-based Forwarding
Similar to traditional IP Forwarding.	Similar to MPLS.
Installs identical flows on each switch on the data path.	Map flows to paths on ingress switches and assigns user traffic to paths at the edge node
Scalability concerns relating to flow updates after a change in topology.	Compute paths across the network and installs end-to-end path-forwarding entries.
Significant overhead in large-scale networks.	Works better than hop-by-hop forwarding in large-scale networks.
FIB update challenges. Convergence time.	Core switches don’t have to support the same granular functionality as edge switches.

Obviously, with any controller, the controller is a lucrative target for attack. Anyone who knows you are using a controller-based network will try to attack the controller and its control plane. The attacker may attempt to intercept the controller-to-switch communication and replace it with its commands, essentially attacking the control plane with whatever means they like.

An attacker may also try to insert a malformed packet or some other type of unknown packet into the controller ( fuzzing attack ), exploiting bugs in the controller and causing the controller to crash.

Fuzzing attacks can be carried out with application scanning software such as Burp Suite. It attempts to manipulate data in a particular way, breaking the application.

The best way to tighten security is to encrypt switch-to-controller communications with SSL and self-signed certificates to authenticate the switch and controller. It would also be best to minimize interaction with the data plane, except for ARP and MAC learning.

To prevent denial-of-service attacks on the controller, you can use Control Plane Policing ( CoPP ) on Ingress to avoid overloading the switch and the controller. Currently, NEC is the only vendor implementing CoPP.

The Hybrid deployment model is helpful from a security perspective. For example, you can group specific ports or VLANs to OpenFlow and other ports or VLANs to traditional forwarding, then use traditional forwarding to communicate with the OpenFlow controller.

Software-defined networking or traditional routing protocols?

The move to a Software-Defined Networking architecture has clear advantages. It’s agile and can react quickly to business needs, such as new product development. For businesses to succeed, they must have software that continues evolving.

Otherwise, your customers and staff may lose interest in your product and service. The following table displays the advantages and disadvantages of the existing routing protocol control architecture.

+Reliable and well known.	-Non-standard Forwarding models. Destination-only and not load-aware metrics**
+Proven with 20 plus years field experience.	-Loosely coupled.
+Deterministic and predictable.	-Lacks end-to-end transactional consistency and visibility.
+Self-Healing. Traffic can reroute around a failed node or link.	-Limited Topology discovery and extraction. Basic neighbor and topology tables.
+Autonomous.	-Lacks the ability to change existing control plane protocol behavior.
+Scalable.	-Lacks the ability to introduce new control plane protocols.
+Plenty of learning and reading materials.

** Basic EIGRP IETF originally proposed an Energy-Aware Control Plane, but the IETF later removed this.

Software-Defined Networking: Use Cases

Edge Security policy enforcement at the network edge.	Authenticate users or VMs and deploy per-user ACL before connecting a user to the network.
Custom routing and online TE.	The ability to route on a variety of business metrics aka routing for dollars. Allowing you to override the default routing behavior.
Custom traffic processing.	For analytics and encryption.
Programmable SPAN ports	Use Openflow entries to mirror selected traffic to the SPAN port.
DoS traffic blackholing & distributed DoS prevention.	Block DoS traffic as close to the source as possible with more selective traffic targeting than the original RTBH approach**. The traffic blocking is implemented in OpenFlow switches. Higher performance with significantly lower costs.
Traffic redirection and service insertion.	Redirect a subset of traffic to network appliances and install redirection flow entries wherever needed.
Network Monitoring.	The controller is the authoritative source of information on network topology and Forwarding paths.
Scale-Out Load Balancing.	Punt new flows to the Openflow controller and install per-session entries throughout the network.
IPS Scale-Out.	OpenFlow is used to distribute the load to multiple IDS appliances.

**Remote-Triggered Black Hole: RTBH refers to installing a host route to a bogus IP address ( RTBH address ) pointing to NULL interfaces on all routers. BGP is used to advertise the host routes to other BGP peers of the attacked hosts, with the next hop pointing to the RTBH address, and it is mainly automated in ISP environments.

SDN deployment models

Guidelines:

Start with small deployments away from the mission-critical production path, i.e., the Core. Ideally, start with device or service provisioning systems.
Start at the Edge and slowly integrate with the Core. Minimize the risk and blast radius. Start with packet filters at the Edge and tasks that can be easily automated ( VLANs ).
Integrate new technology with the existing network.
Gradually increase scale and gain trust. Experience is key.
Have the controller in a protected out-of-band network with SSL connectivity to the switches.

There are 4 different models for OpenFlow deployment, and the following sections list the key points of each model.

Native OpenFlow

They are commonly used for Greenfield deployments.
The controller performs all the intelligent functions.
The forwarding plane switches have little intelligence and solely perform packet forwarding.
The white box switches need IP connectivity to the controller for the OpenFlow control sessions. If you are forced to use an in-band network for this communication path using an isolated VLAN with STP, you should use an out-of-band network.
Fast convergence techniques such as BFD may be challenging to use with a central controller.
Many people believe that this approach does not work for a regular company. Companies implementing native OpenFlow, such as Google, have the time and resources to reinvent the wheel when implementing a new control-plane protocol ( OpenFlow ).

Native OpenFlow with Extensions

Some control plane functions are handled from the centralized controller to the forwarding plane switches. For example, the OpenFlow-enabled switches could load balancing across multiple links without the controller’s previous decision. You could also run STP, LACP, or ARP locally on the switch without interaction with the controller. This approach is helpful if you lose connectivity to the controller. If the low-level switches perform certain controller functions, packet forwarding will continue in the event of failure.
The local switches should support the specific OpenFlow extensions that let them perform functions on the controller’s behalf.

Hybrid ( Ships in the night )

This approach is used where OpenFlow runs in parallel with the production network.
The same network box is controlled by existing on-box and off-box control planes ( OpenFlow).
Suitable for pilot deployment models as switches still run traditional control plane protocols.
The Openflow controller manages only specific VLANs or ports on the network.
The big challenge is determining and investigating the conflict-free sharing of forwarding plane resources across multiple control planes.

Integrated OpenFlow

OpenFlow classifiers and forwarding entries are integrated with the existing control plane. For example, Juniper’s OpenFlow model follows this mode of operation where OpenFlow static routes can be redistributed into the other routing protocols.
No need for a new control plane.
No need to replace all forwarding hardware
It is the most practical approach as long as the vendor supports it.

Closing Points on OpenFlow

OpenFlow is a communication protocol that provides access to the forwarding plane of a network switch or router over the network. It was initially developed at Stanford University and has since been embraced by the Open Networking Foundation (ONF) as a core component of SDN. OpenFlow allows network administrators to program the control plane, enabling them to direct how packets are forwarded through the network. This decoupling of the control and data planes is what empowers SDN to offer more dynamic and flexible network management.

The architecture of OpenFlow is quite straightforward yet powerful. It consists of three main components: the controller, the switch, and the protocol itself. The controller is the brains of the operation, managing network traffic by sending instructions to OpenFlow-enabled switches. These switches, in turn, execute the instructions received, altering the flow of network data accordingly. This setup allows for centralized network control, offering unprecedented levels of automation and agility.

**Advantages of OpenFlow**

OpenFlow brings several critical advantages to network management and control:

1. Flexibility and Programmability: With OpenFlow, network administrators can dynamically reconfigure the behavior of network devices, allowing for greater adaptability to changing network requirements.

2. Centralized Control: By centralizing control in a single controller, network administrators gain a holistic view of the network, simplifying management and troubleshooting processes.

3. Innovation and Experimentation: OpenFlow enables researchers and developers to experiment with new network protocols and applications, fostering innovation in the networking industry.

4. Scalability: OpenFlow’s centralized control architecture provides the scalability needed to manage large-scale networks efficiently.

**Implications for Network Control**

OpenFlow has significant implications for network control, paving the way for new possibilities in network management:

1. Software-Defined Networking (SDN): OpenFlow is a critical component of the broader concept of SDN, which aims to decouple network control from the underlying hardware, providing a more flexible and programmable infrastructure.

2. Network Virtualization: OpenFlow facilitates network virtualization, allowing multiple virtual networks to coexist on a single physical infrastructure.

3. Traffic Engineering: By controlling the flow of packets at a granular level, OpenFlow enables advanced traffic engineering techniques, optimizing network performance and resource utilization.

OpenFlow represents a paradigm shift in network control, offering a more flexible, scalable, and programmable approach to managing networks. By separating the control and data planes, OpenFlow empowers network administrators to have fine-grained control over network behavior, improving efficiency, innovation, and adaptability. As the networking industry continues to evolve, OpenFlow and its related technologies will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping the future of network management.

Summary: What is OpenFlow?

In the rapidly evolving world of networking, OpenFlow has emerged as a game-changer. This revolutionary technology has transformed the way networks are managed, offering unprecedented flexibility, control, and efficiency. In this blog post, we will delve into the depths of OpenFlow, exploring its definition, key features, and benefits.

What is OpenFlow?

OpenFlow can be best described as an open standard communications protocol that enables the separation of the control plane and the data plane in network devices. It allows centralized control over a network’s forwarding elements, making it possible to program and manage network traffic dynamically. By decoupling the intelligence of the network from the underlying hardware, OpenFlow provides a flexible and programmable infrastructure for network administrators.

Key Features of OpenFlow

a) Centralized Control: One of the core features of OpenFlow is its ability to centralize network control, allowing administrators to define and implement policies from a single point of control. This centralized control improves network visibility and simplifies management tasks.

b) Programmability: OpenFlow’s programmability empowers network administrators to define how network traffic should be handled based on their specific requirements. Through the use of flow tables and match-action rules, administrators can dynamically control the behavior of network switches and routers.

c) Software-Defined Networking (SDN) Integration: OpenFlow plays a crucial role in the broader concept of Software-Defined Networking. It provides a standardized interface for SDN controllers to communicate with network devices, enabling dynamic and automated network provisioning.

Benefits of OpenFlow

a) Enhanced Network Flexibility: With OpenFlow, network administrators can easily adapt and customize their networks to suit evolving business needs. The ability to modify network behavior on the fly allows for efficient resource allocation and improved network performance.

b) Simplified Network Management: By centralizing network control, OpenFlow simplifies the management of complex network architectures. Policies and configurations can be applied uniformly across the network, reducing administrative overhead and minimizing the chances of configuration errors.

c) Innovation and Experimentation: OpenFlow fosters innovation by providing a platform for the development and deployment of new network protocols and applications. Researchers and developers can experiment with novel networking concepts, paving the way for future advancements in the field.

Conclusion

OpenFlow has ushered in a new era of network management, offering unparalleled flexibility and control. Its ability to separate the control plane from the data plane, coupled with centralized control and programmability, has opened up endless possibilities in network architecture design. As organizations strive for more agile and efficient networks, embracing OpenFlow and its associated technologies will undoubtedly be a wise choice.

Cisco ACI Components

Highlights: Cisco ACI Components

The ACI Fabric

–The Cisco Nexus Family–

–ACI Architecture: Spine and Leaf–

Cisco ACI Components

Introduction to Leaf and Spine

The ACI fabric: Does Not Aggregate Traffic

**Overlay and Underlay Design**

Mapping Traffic:

**Overlay and Underlay Components**

Underlay & Overlay Interaction

Multicast Distribution Tree (MDT)

Normalize the transports

Bridge Domains and VRF

Direct host routing for endoints

The VTEP and PTEP

**The Spine TEP**

**Anycast IP Addressing**

The ACI optimizations

**Mouse and elephant flow**

**ARP optimizations: Anycast gateways**

**Fabric anycast addressing**

**Pervasive gateway**

ACI Cisco: Integrations

Cisco Multi-Pod Design

ACI Cisco and AlgoSec

ACI Cisco and AppDynamics

ACI Cisco and SD-WAN

Openshift and Cisco SDN ACI

OpenShift and Cisco ACI

Cisco SDN ACI and AppDynamics

Types of Agents for Infrastructure Visibility

Summary: Cisco ACI Components

BGP SDN

Highlights: BGP SDN

Key BGP SDN Considerations:

BGP-based SDN

BGP vs SDN:

Synergizing BGP and SDN

Recap Technology: EBGP over IBGP

Recap Technology: BGP Route Reflection

Challenges to Networking

Traffic Engineering

BGP-only Network

BGP SDN

BGP Peering Session Overview

The Emergence of BGP in SDN:

Layer-2 and Layer-3 Technologies

How BGP works with BGP SDN: Centralized forwarding

A link-state map

Routing Control Platform

Multi-Topology view

BGP and OpenFlow

Closing Points on BGP SDN

Summary: BGP SDN

What is OpenFlow?

Highlights: What is OpenFlow?

How does OpenFlow work?

The Role of OpenFlow Controllers

Introducing SDN

Data and control plane

Knowledge Check: Data & Control Plane

Building blocks: SDN Environment

OpenFlow Table & Routing Tables

What is OpenFlow?

What is OpenFlow?

What is SDN?

How OpenFlow Works:

What is OpenFlow SDN?

OpenFlow reference switch

**A key point: The lack of a session layer in the TCP/IP stack**

Control and data plane

**Control plane**

**Data plane**

The advent of VXLAN

Proactive versus reactive flow setup

Hop-by-hop versus path-based forwarding

Software-defined networking or traditional routing protocols?

Software-Defined Networking: Use Cases

Overlay and Underlay Design

Overlay and Underlay Components

The Spine TEP

Anycast IP Addressing

Mouse and elephant flow

ARP optimizations: Anycast gateways

Fabric anycast addressing

Pervasive gateway

A key point: The lack of a session layer in the TCP/IP stack

Control plane

Data plane