Switching and Routing

Before we get into the technical details of which protocol routers use to forward messages, let us address the basics. We know we have Layer 2 switches that create Ethernet LANs. So, all endpoints physically connect to a Layer 2 switch. And if you are on a single LAN with one large VLAN, you are prepared with this setup as switches work out of the box, causing conclusions based on Layer 2 MAC addresses. However, what if you want to send data from your network to another, across the Internet, or a different set of VLANs in different IP subnets?

In this case, we need a Layer 3 router and an IP routing process with an IP forwarding algorithm. So, do you want to know which protocol routers forward messages? The Layer 3 router uses the information in the IP header to determine whether and where to forward each received packet and which network interface to send the packet to.

Examples: Forwarding Routing Protocols

One of the most commonly used forwarding routing protocols is the Routing Information Protocol (RIP). RIP is a distance-vector protocol that uses a metric, typically hop count, to determine the best path for data packets. It exchanges routing information with neighboring routers and updates its routing table accordingly. RIP is suitable for small to medium-sized networks due to its simplicity and ease of configuration.

Another widely used forwarding routing protocol is the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol. OSPF is a link-state protocol that calculates the shortest path to a destination based on various factors, such as bandwidth, delay, reliability, and cost. It advertises link-state information to neighboring routers, allowing them to build a complete network topology. OSPF is commonly implemented in large-scale networks due to its scalability and advanced features.

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is a forwarding routing protocol commonly used in internet service provider (ISP) networks. BGP is an exterior gateway protocol that facilitates the exchange of routing information between different autonomous systems (ASes). It enables ISPs to select the best path for data packets based on various policies, such as path length, network congestion, and customer preferences. BGP is crucial for maintaining a stable and efficient internet routing infrastructure.

1st Lab Guide: OSPF

In the following lab guide, we address OSPF. OSPF, developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), is an interior gateway protocol (IGP) used for routing within autonomous systems (AS). A link-state routing protocol uses the Shortest Path First (SPF) algorithm to determine the best path for forwarding data packets. OSPF is widely adopted due to its scalability, fast convergence, and support for multiple network types.

Note:

Notice that we have two OSPF neighbors. We use the default broadcast network type and have an OSPF status of FULL/DR. I have changed the OSPF cost on the link Gi1 so that we can perform traffic engineering. Now that the links have the exact OSPF costs, a total metric of 4, we can perform ECMP. You can also bond links; we combine two links for additional bandwidth.

Example: OSPF Routed Core

With a leaf and spine, we can have a routed core. So, we gain the benefits of running a routing protocol, such as OSPF, all the way down to the access layer. This has many advantages, such as full use of links. The guide below has three routers: two leaves and two spines. OSPF is the routing protocol with Area 0; we are not running STP.

Therefore, we can have Layer 3 routing for both spines to reach the destinations on Leaf B. I have a loopback configured on Leaf B of 1.1.1.1. Each leaf has an OSPF neighbor relationship to each spine with an OSPF network type of Broadcast. Notice the command: Show IP route 1.1.1.1 on Leaf A.

Note:

We initially only had one path via Spine B, i.e., the shortest path based on OSPF cost. Once I made the OSPF costs the same for the entire path  (Cost of 4, routing metric of 4 ), we installed 2 paths in the routing table and can now rely on the fast convergence of OSPF for link failure detection and recovery.

We will expand this with one of the following lab guides in this blog with VXLAN and create a layer 2 overlay. Remember that ACI does not have OSPF and uses IS-IS; it also has a particular configuration for VXLAN, and much of the CLI complexity is abstracted. However, the focus of these lab guides is on illustration and learning.

The process of routing and network stretch

Routing is selecting a path for traffic in a network or between or among multiple networks. Routing is performed for various networks, including the Internet, circuit-switched, and packet-switched networks. The routing process usually directs forwarding based on routing tables, which maintain a record of the routes to various network destinations. Thus, constructing routing tables in the router’s memory is crucial for efficient routing.

Routing is typically based on the shortest path algorithm, which finds the shortest path from source to destination in a network. The shortest path algorithm can be implemented using various techniques, such as Dijkstra’s and Bellman-Ford’s algorithms. In addition, routing can also be based on other criteria, such as least cost, lowest delay, or highest reliability.

Routing Tables

Routing protocols are used to maintain router routing tables. These protocols enable the routers to exchange information about the network topology, such as which nodes are connected, and then determine the best routes. The most common routing protocols are the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) and the Routing Information Protocol (RIP).

Routing also ensures that data sent over the Internet reaches its destination. To do this, routers use the Internet Protocol (IP) to forward packets between networks. They examine the packet’s IP header and use this information to determine the best route for the packet.

Lab Guide: EIGRP Configuration

EIGRP stands for Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol and is a routing protocol created by Cisco. Initially, it was only available on Cisco hardware, but for a few years, it’s now an open standard. EIGRP is called a hybrid or advanced distance vector protocol, and most of the rules that apply to RIP also apply here:

• Split Horizon
• Route Poisoning
• Poison Reverse

EIGRP routers will send hello packets to other routers like OSPF; if you send and receive them, you will become neighbors. EIGRP neighbors will exchange routing information, which will be saved in the topology table

Configuring EIGRP is similar to RIP. The “1” is the AS number, which must be the same on all routers! We require the no auto-summary command because, by default, EIGRP behaves classfully, and we want it to be classless.

Next, let’s have a look at the routing table below. The first thing you might notice is that you see a “D” for the EIGRP entries. You see a “D” and not an “E” because the last one has already been taken for EGP, an old routing protocol we no longer use. “D” stands for “dual,” which is the mechanism behind EIGRP. The loopback 4.4.4.0 is connected to R4, and R1 has two ways to reach this network. This is because all links are Gigabit Ethernet, and I have not changed any metrics.

Routing vs Forwarding

Often, routing is confused with forwarding, but routing is a different process. When routing data, routers move data between devices. During data forwarding, a device collects data from one device and sends it to another. Let’s take a closer look at the forwarding process.

The forwarding process involves collecting data from one device and sending it to another. Data is not moved from one device to another in this process. In contrast to routing, forwarding performs some actions and forwards packets to intermediate routers. It does not determine the path. We only forward the packets to another attached network in the forwarding process.

The network layer performs both routing and forwarding. A forwarding device collects data and sends it to another. Hubs, routers, and switches are some of the most popular forwarding devices.

3rd Lab Guide: IS-IS Routing Protocol

In the following sample, we have an IS-IS network.

The ISIS routing protocol is a link-state routing protocol that operates at the OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) layer 2. It was initially developed for large-scale networks such as the Internet, where scalability, stability, and efficient routing are paramount.

Note:

Below, we have four routers. R1 and R2 are in area 12, and R3 and R4 are in area 34. R1 and R3 are intra-area routers so they will be configured as level 1 routers. R2 and R4 form the backbone so these routers will be configured as levels 1-2.

♦ Key Features of ISIS Routing Protocol:

Hierarchical Design: ISIS employs a hierarchical design, dividing the network into areas to simplify routing and improve scalability. Each region has a designated router, the Intermediate System (IS), which is responsible for exchanging routing information with other ISes.

Link-State Database: ISIS maintains a link-state database that contains information about the network topology and the state of individual links. This database calculates the shortest path to a destination and ensures efficient routing.

2.3. Dynamic Updates: ISIS uses a dynamic routing algorithm to exchange routing information between ISes. It continuously updates the link-state database based on network changes, ensuring the routing information is always current.

2.4. Support for Multiple Routing Protocols: ISIS is interoperable with protocols such as OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and BGP (Border Gateway Protocol). This flexibility allows networks to integrate ISIS with existing routing infrastructures seamlessly.

Packet-switching Networks

The Internet is a packet-switching network that enables its attached devices, such as your personal computer ( PC ), to exchange information with other devices. Information exchange could take many different forms. From a user level, it could be checking your bank balance with Internet banking, buying a book on an Amazon website, watching a movie online, or downloading your favorite song.

Hypertext Transfer Protocol ( HTTP ) accounts for most Internet traffic and is the protocol behind the World Wide Web ( WWW ). However, for these upper-layer protocols ( HTTP ) to work efficiently and offer a satisfactory user experience, elements lower in the Open Systems Interconnection ( OSI ) communication module must be fine-tuned and operational for data transfers. 

Forwarding Protocols

Which protocol is used by routers to forward messages?

• The two transport protocols

The TCP/IP protocol suite supports two transport protocols ( Layer 4 ): Transmission Control Protocol (TCP ) and User Datagram Protocol ( UDP ). TCP reliably provides a host-to-host communication service, while UDP provides host-to-host communication in an unreliable fashion.

As a result, TCP offers many services better suited for applications requiring certain service guarantees and error correction and detection, such as Border Gateway Protocol, which operates on Port 179. On the other hand, UDP offers fewer services and is helpful for situations where packet loss is less sensitive, but time delays are more problematic.

This information is traversed across the Internet backbone via the Network ( Layer 3 ) and Data Link layer ( Layer 2 ). It is encoded in long strings of bits called packets. Packets describe a chunk of data going from the IP ( Internet Protocol ) layer to the network interface ( Data Link Layer ).

Lab Guide: BGP Next hop tracking

BGP Next Hop Tracking is a feature within the BGP routing protocol that allows routers to track the reachability of next-hop IP addresses. By monitoring the availability of next-hop routers, network administrators can make informed decisions regarding traffic routing and ensure efficient packet transmission.

BGP Next Hop Tracking offers several advantages in terms of network resilience. Firstly, it enables the identification and avoidance of black holes or suboptimal routing paths by detecting unreachable next-hop IP addresses. This ensures traffic is efficiently routed along viable paths, minimizing latency and potential packet loss. Additionally, BGP Next Hop Tracking facilitates faster convergence during network failures by swiftly redirecting traffic to alternate paths, reducing the impact of network disruptions.

The Packet and a Datagram

A packet is not the same as a datagram and can be either an IP datagram or a fragment of an IP datagram. Note: The terminology “packet” refers to the Ethernet payload, which consists of the IP header and the user data. The terminology frame refers to the data link headers and the payload.

As these packets travel through the Internet from their source ( your personal computer ) to their destination ( Amazon website ), certain decisions are made by each device the packet traverses. These are known as routing decisions and determine if the packet should go this way or that way.

The devices making these decisions are called routers. Different routers act at different network points, such as over the WAN with SD-WAN routers: SD WAN tutorial.

IP Packet versus IP Datagram
The diagram shows the different definitions of an IP packet compared to an IP datagram. It also shows how an IP datagram is fragmented into two IP packets, with the second IP packet being the second part of the first IP packet.

Routing Tables and Routing Protocols

These devices have a routing table that tells them how and where to forward the packets. The routing table is populated by a dynamic or static process called a routing protocol. A static routing protocol is specific to that device, manually configured, and is not automatically populated to other routers.

A dynamic process runs distributed algorithms that the routers run among themselves to make the correct routing decision.

An example of a dynamic routing protocol is OSPF, and a static routing protocol would be a static route. A router’s routing protocol may be Distance Vector Algorithms or Link-State Algorithms. Distance Vector Algorithms are more straightforward and usually try to find paths with a simple metric, such as the number of router hops ( devices ) to the destination.

On the WAN side, we have Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and the use case of BGP SDN. We are enabling WAN virtualization and SDN traffic optimizations.

4th Lab Guide: EIGRP

In the following, we have an EIGRP network that consists of two routers.

Note:

Efficient Exchange of Routing Information

One of EIGRP’s strengths is its ability to exchange routing information with neighboring routers. Using Hello packets and Update packets, EIGRP establishes and maintains neighbor relationships. This dynamic exchange ensures that routers are constantly updated with the latest network topology information, facilitating efficient route computation and decision-making.

 For neighbor discovery and recovery, EIGRP neighbors send hello packets. If you send and receive hello packets, EIGRP will form a neighbor relationship with another router. If you receive hello packets from the other side, EIGRP will assume the other router is still present. When you no longer receive them, you’ll lose the neighbor relationship called adjacency, and EIGRP might have to look for another route.

EIGRP uses RTP (Reliable Transport Protocol) to deliver packets between neighbors in a reliable and orderly manner. There are two ways to send packets, multicast and unicast, and not all packets are sent reliably to keep things efficient. We need acknowledgment from the other side to ensure our packets are reliable.

Analysis:

Populating the Topology Table

EIGRP populates its topology table by exchanging Hello and Update packets with neighboring routers. These packets carry information about the network’s topology, such as feasible successors, advertised distances, and reported distances. As EIGRP receives these updates, its topology table will be updated accordingly.

Computing the Best Paths

Once the topology table is populated, EIGRP utilizes the DUAL algorithm to determine the best paths to reach destination networks. The algorithm considers bandwidth, delay, reliability, and load to calculate each route’s composite metric, the metric value. This metric value aids in selecting the optimal path for packet forwarding.

Maintaining and Updating the Topology Table

The EIGRP topology table is a dynamic entity that undergoes constant updates. EIGRP ensures that the topology table is kept current as changes occur in the network. When a link or router fails, EIGRP recalculates paths based on the remaining available routes and updates the topology table accordingly.

Routing convergence: Determine the Best Path

A router runs its algorithm and determines the best path to a particular destination; the router then notifies all of the neighboring routers of its current path; concurrently, the router’s neighbors also inform the router of their best paths. All of this occurs in a process known as routing convergence.

After seeing all the other best paths from its neighboring devices, the router may notice a better path through one of its neighbors. If so, the router updates its routing table with better paths. A link-state algorithm employs a replicated database approach compared to a Distance Vector Algorithm ( distributed calculation ).

Each router contributes to database pieces; every device adds an element to create a complete network map. However, instead of advertising a list of distances to each known destination, the router advertises the states of its local links ( interfaces ).

Link state advertisements

These link-state advertisements are then advertised to the other routers; all these messages combine to complete a network database synchronized between each router at regular intervals.

Essentially, link-state protocols must flood information about the topology to every device in the network, and the distance ( path ) vector protocols must process the topology change information at every hop through the network.

 A final note on forwarding protocols: Forwarding routing protocols

Routing protocols continually reevaluate their contents, and the process of finding new information after a change in the network is called convergence. A network deemed to be highly available must have not only a redundant physical topology but also fast convergence so that service degradation or interruption is avoided. Convergence should be designed efficiently at Layer 2 and Layer 3 levels.

Fast convergence of Layer 2 environments is designed with the Spanning Tree Protocol ( STP ) enhancements, notably PVST+. In L3 environments, we prefer routing protocols that can quickly find new information ( next hops ), with protocols having a short convergence. 

You might conclude from the descriptions of both link-state and distance-vector protocols that link-state algorithms will always converge more quickly than distance or path-vector protocols. However, this isn’t the case; both converge exceptionally promptly if the underlying network has been designed and optimized for operation. 

Closing Points: Forwarding Routing Protocols

Forwarding routing protocols play a crucial role in efficiently transmitting data across networks. This blog post delved into forwarding routing protocols, exploring their significance, functionality, and types. By the end, you will clearly understand how these protocols enable seamless communication between devices on a network.

Forwarding routing protocols have several key benefits that make them essential in network communication:

1. Scalability: Forwarding routing protocols enable networks to expand and accommodate a growing number of devices. These protocols dynamically adapt to changes in network topology, allowing for the seamless integration of new devices and routes.

2. Redundancy: Forwarding routing protocols continuously exchange routing information to ensure alternative paths are available in case of link failures. This redundancy enhances network reliability and minimizes downtime.

3. Load Balancing: Forwarding routing protocols distribute network traffic across multiple paths, optimizing network performance and preventing congestion. This feature allows for efficient utilization of network resources.

Types of Forwarding Routing Protocols:

Various forwarding routing protocols are designed to cater to specific network requirements. Let’s explore some of the most commonly used types:

1. Distance Vector Protocols:

Distance vector protocols, such as the Routing Information Protocol (RIP), use a simple approach to determining the best path. Routers exchange their routing tables, which contain information about the distance and direction of various network destinations. RIP, for example, evaluates paths using hop count as a metric.

2. Link State Protocols:

Link state protocols, such as Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), build a detailed database of the network’s topology. Routers share information about their directly connected links, allowing each router to construct a complete network view. This comprehensive knowledge enables OSPF to calculate the shortest path to each destination.

3. Hybrid Protocols:

Hybrid protocols, like Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), combine elements of both distance vector and link state protocols. These protocols balance simplicity and efficiency, utilizing fast convergence and load-balancing features to optimize network performance.

Forwarding routing protocols are essential for ensuring reliable and efficient data transmission in computer networks. By determining the optimal paths for data packets, these protocols contribute to the overall performance and stability of the network. Understanding different forwarding routing protocols, such as RIP, OSPF, and BGP, is crucial for network administrators and engineers to design and manage robust networks.

Forwarding protocols are vital in modern networking, enabling efficient data routing and seamless network communication. Understanding these protocols’ different types, benefits, and challenges is crucial for network administrators and engineers. Organizations can confidently navigate the digital highway by implementing best practices and staying abreast of advancements in forwarding routing protocols.