Zero Trust Access

Safe-T; A Progressive Approach to Zero Trust Access

by Blog

 

 

Zero Trust SDP

The foundations that support our systems are built with connectivity, not security, as an essential feature. TCP connects before it authenticates. Security policy and user access based on IP lack context and allow architectures with overly permissive access. This will likely result in a brittle security posture enabling the need for Zero Trust SDP and SDP VPN.

Our environment has changed considerably, leaving traditional network and security architectures vulnerable to attack. The threat landscape is unpredictable. We are getting hit by external threats from all over the world. However, the environment is not just limited to external threats. There are insider threats within a user group and insider threats across user group boundaries.

Therefore, we must find ways to decouple security from the physical network and decouple application access from the network. We must change our mindset and invert the security model to a Zero Trust Security Strategy to do this. Software Defined Perimeter (SDP) is an extension of Zero Trust Network ZTN, which presents a revolutionary development. It provides an updated approach that current security architectures fail to address.

SDP is often referred to as Zero Trust Access (ZTA). Safe-T’s package of the access control software is called: Safe-T Zero+. Safe-T offers a phased deployment model, enabling you to progressively migrate to zero-trust network architecture while lowering the risk of technology adoption. Safe-T’s Zero+ model is flexible to meet today’s diverse hybrid IT requirements. It satisfies the zero-trust principles used to combat today’s network security challenges.

 

Before you proceed, you may find the following posts helpful:

  1. Zero Trust SASE
  2. Zero Trust Networking
  3. SDP Network

 



Zero Trust SDP

Key Safe-T Zero Trust Strategy Discussion points:


  • Network challenges.

  • The issues with legacy VPN.

  • Introduction to Zero Trust Access.

  • Safe-T SDP solution.

  • Safe-T SDP and Zero Trust capabilities.

 

Network Challenges

  • Connect First and Then Authenticate

TCP has a weak security foundation. When clients want to communicate and have access to an application: they first set up a connection. Only after the connect stage has been carried out can the authentication stage be accomplished. Unfortunately, with this model, we have no idea who the client is until they have completed the connect phase. There is a possibility that the requesting client is not trustworthy.

 

  • The Network Perimeter

We began with static domains, whereby a fixed perimeter separates internal and external segments. Public IP addresses are assigned to the external host, and private addresses are to the internal. If a host is assigned a private IP, it is thought to be more trustworthy than if it has a public IP address. Therefore, trusted hosts operate internally, while untrusted operate externally to the perimeter. The significant factor that needs to be considered is that IP addresses lack user knowledge to assign and validate trust.

Today, IT has become more diverse since it supports hybrid architectures with various user types, humans, applications, and the proliferation of connected devices. Cloud adoption has become the norm since many remote workers access the corporate network from various devices and places.

The perimeter approach no longer accurately reflects the typical topology of users and servers. It was built for a different era where everything was inside the organization’s walls. However, today, organizations are increasingly deploying applications in public clouds located in geographical locations. These locations are remote from an organization’s trusted firewalls and the perimeter network. This certainly stretches the network perimeter.

We have a fluid network perimeter where data and users are located everywhere. Hence, now we operate in a completely new environment. But the security policy controlling user access is built for static corporate-owned devices within the supposed trusted LAN.

 

  • Lateral Movements

A significant concern with the perimeter approach is that it assumes a trusted internal network. However, 80% of threats are from internal malware or malicious employee that will often go undetected.

Besides, with the rise of phishing emails, an unintentional click will give a bad actor broad-level access. And once on the LAN, the bad actors can move laterally from one segment to another. They are likely to navigate undetected between or within the segments.

Eventually, the bad actor can steal the credentials and use them to capture and exfiltrate valuable assets. Even social media accounts can be targeted for data exfiltration since the firewall does not often inspect them as a file transfer mechanism.

 

  • Issues with the Virtual Private Network (VPN)

What happens with traditional VPN access is that the tunnel creates an extension between the client’s device and the application’s location. The VPN rules are static and do not dynamically change with the changing levels of trust on a given device. They provide only network information, which is a significant limitation.

Therefore, from a security standpoint, the traditional method of VPN access enables the clients to have broad network-level access. This makes the network susceptible to undetected lateral movements. Also, the remote users are authenticated and authorized but once permitted to the LAN. They have coarse-grained access. This creates a high level of risk as undetected malware on a user’s device can spread to an internal network.

Another significant challenge is that VPNs generate administrative complexity and cannot easily handle cloud or multiple network environments. They require the installation of end-user VPN software clients and knowing where the application they are accessing is located. Users would have to change their VPN client software to access the applications at different locations. In a nutshell, traditional VPNs are complex for administrators to manage and for users to operate.

With public concern over surveillance, privacy, and identity theft growing, many people are turning to VPNs to help keep them safer online. But where should you start when choosing the best VPN for your needs?

Also, poor user experience will likely occur as you need to backhaul the user traffic to a regional data center. This adds latency and bandwidth costs.

In recent years, torrenting has become increasingly popular among computer users who wish to download movies, books, and songs. Without having a VPN, you could risk your privacy and security. It is also important to note that you should be very careful when downloading files to your computer as they could cause more harm than good. 

 

Can Zero Trust Access be the Solution?

The main principle that Zero Trust Network Design follows is that nothing should be trusted. This is regardless of whether the connection originates inside or outside the network perimeter. Reasonably, today, we have no reason to trust any user, device, or application; some companies may try and decrease accessibility by using programs like office 365 distribution group to allow and disallow users’ and devices’ specific network permissions. You know that you cannot protect what you cannot see, but you also cannot attack what you cannot see also holds. ZTA makes the application and the infrastructure utterly undetectable to unauthorized clients, creating an invisible network.

Preferably, application access should be based on contextual parameters, such as who/where the user is located and the judgment of the security stance of the device. Then a continuous assessment of the session should be performed. This moves us from network-centric to user-centric, providing a connection-based approach to security. Security enforcement should be based on user context and include policies that matter to the business. It should be unlike a policy based on subnets that have no meaning. The authentication workflows should include context-aware data, such as device ID, geographic location, and the time and day when the user requests access.

It’s not good enough to provide network access. We must provide granular application access with a dynamic segment of 1. Here, an application microsegment gets created for every request that comes in. Micro-segmentation creates the ability to control access by subdividing the larger network into small secure application micro perimeter internal to the network. This abstraction layer puts a lockdown on lateral movements. In addition, zero trust access also implements a policy of least privilege by enforcing controls that enable the users to have access only to the resources they need to perform their tasks.

 

Characteristics of Safe-T

Safe-T has three main pillars to provide a secure application and file access solution:

1) An architecture that implements zero trust access,

2) A proprietary secure channel that enables users to access/share sensitive files remotely and

3) User behavior analytics.

Safe-T’s SDP architecture is designed to substantially implement the essential capabilities delineated by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) architecture. Safe-T’s Zero+ is built using these main components:

The Safe-T Access Controller is the centralized control and policy enforcement engine that enforces end-user authentication and access. It acts as the control layer, governing the flow between end-users and backend services.

Secondly, the Access Gateway is a front-end for all the backend services published to an untrusted network. The Authentication Gateway presents to the end-user in a clientless web browser. Hence, a pre-configured authentication workflow is provided by the Access Controller. The authentication workflow is a customizable set of authentication steps, such as 3rd party IDPs (Okta, Microsoft, DUO Security, etc.). In addition, it has built-in options, such as a captcha, username/password, No-Post, and OTP.

 

Safe-T Zero+ Capabilities

The Safe-T Zero+ capabilities are in line with zero trust principles. With Safe-T Zero+, clients requesting access must go through authentication and authorization stages before accessing the resource. Any network resource that has not passed these steps is blackened. Here, URL rewriting is used to hide the backend services.

This reduces the attack surface to an absolute minimum and follows Safe-T’s axiom: If you can’t be seen, you can’t be hacked. In a normal operating environment, for the users to access services behind a firewall, they have to open ports on the firewall. This presents security risks as a bad actor could directly access that service via the open port and exploit any vulnerabilities.

Another paramount capability of Safe-T Zero+ is implementing a patented technology called reverse access to eliminate the need to open incoming ports in the internal firewall. This also eliminates the need to store sensitive data in the demilitarized zone (DMZ). It can extend to on-premise, public, and hybrid cloud, supporting the most diverse hybrid and meeting the IT requirements. Zero+ can be deployed on-premises, as part of Safe-T’s SDP services, or on AWS, Azure, and other cloud infrastructures, thereby protecting both cloud and on-premise resources.

Zero+ provides the capability of user behavior analytics that monitors the actions of protected web applications. This allows the administrator to inspect the details of anomalous behavior. Forensic assessment is more accessible by offering a single source for logging.

Finally, Zero+ provides a unique, native HTTPS-based file access solution for the NTFS file system, replacing the vulnerable SMB protocol. Besides, users can create a standard mapped network drive in their Windows explorer. This provides a secure, encrypted, access-controlled channel to shared backend resources.

 

Zero Trust Access: Deployment Strategy

Safe-T customers can exclusively select an architecture that meets their on-premise or cloud-based requirements.

 

There are three options:

i) The customer deploys three VMs: 1) Access Controller, 2) Access Gateway, and 3) Authentication Gateway. The VMs can be deployed on-premises in an organization’s LAN, on Amazon Web Services (AWS) public cloud, or on Microsoft’s Azure public cloud.

ii) The customer deploys the 1) Access Controller VM and 2) Access Gateway VM on-premises in their LAN. The customer deploys the Authentication Gateway VM on a public cloud like AWS or Azure.

iii) The customer deploys the Access Controller VM on-premise in the LAN, and Safe-T deploys and maintains two VMs, 1) Access Gateway and 2) Authentication Gateway, both hosted on Safe-T’s global SDP cloud service.

 

ZTA Migration Path

Today, organizations recognize the need to move to zero-trust architecture. However, there is a difference between recognition and deployment. Also, new technology brings with it considerable risks. Chiefly, traditional Network Access Control (NAC) and VPN solutions fall short in many ways, but a rip-and-replace model is a very aggressive approach.

To transition from legacy to ZTA and single packet authorization, you should look for a migration path you feel comfortable with. Maybe you want to run a traditional VPN in parallel or in conjunction with your SDP solution and only for a group of users for a set period. A probable example could be: choosing a server used primarily by experienced users, such as DevOps or QA personnel. This ensures minimal risk if any problem occurs during your organization’s phased deployment of SDP access.

A recent survey by the CSA indicates that SDP awareness and adoption are still in an early stage. However, when you go down the path of ZTA, vendor selection that provides an architecture that matches your requirements is the key to successful adoption. For example, look for SDP vendors who allow you to continue using your existing VPN deployment while adding.

SDP/ZTA capabilities on top of your VPN. This could sidestep the risks if you switch to an entirely new technology.

 

 

Zero trust security for full protection and data safety outline diagram. Labeled educational scheme with network, identity and device verification for safe information protection vector illustration.

Remote Browser Isolation

by Blog

Remote Browser Isolation

In today's digital landscape, where cyber threats continue to evolve at an alarming rate, businesses and individuals are constantly seeking innovative solutions to safeguard their sensitive information. One such solution that has gained significant attention is Remote Browser Isolation (RBI). In this blog post, we will explore RBI, how it works, and its role in enhancing security in the digital era.

Remote Browser Isolation, as the name suggests, is a technology that isolates web browsing activity from the user's local device. Instead of directly accessing websites and executing code on the user's computer or mobile device, RBI redirects browsing activity to a remote server, where the web page is rendered and interactions are processed. This isolation prevents any malicious code or potential threats from reaching the user's device, effectively minimizing the risk of a cyberattack.

Remote browser isolation offers several compelling benefits for organizations. Firstly, it significantly reduces the surface area for cyberattacks, as potential threats are contained within a remote environment. Additionally, it eliminates the need for frequent patching and software updates on endpoint devices, reducing the burden on IT teams. This section will outline these advantages in detail, showcasing how remote browser isolation can enhance cybersecurity posture.

Implementing remote browser isolation requires careful planning and consideration. This section will explore different approaches to implementation, including on-premises solutions and cloud-based services. It will also discuss the integration challenges that organizations might face and provide insights into best practices for successful deployment.

While remote browser isolation offers immense security benefits, it is crucial to address potential challenges that organizations may encounter during implementation. This section will highlight common obstacles such as compatibility issues, user experience concerns, and cost considerations. By proactively addressing these challenges, organizations can ensure a seamless and effective transition to remote browser isolation.

Matt Conran

Highlights: Remote Browser Isolation

Challenging Landscape

Our digital environment has been transformed significantly. Unlike earlier times, we now have different devices, access methods, and types of users accessing applications from various locations. This makes it more challenging to know which communications can be trusted. The perimeter-based approach to security can no longer be limited to just the enterprise’s physical location.

A Fluid Perimeter

In this modern world, the perimeter is becoming increasingly difficult to enforce as organizations adopt mobile and cloud technologies. Hence, the need for Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) has become integral to the SASE definition. For example, Cisco Umbrella products have several Zero Trust SASE components, such as the CASB tools, and now RBI is integrated into one solution.

network security components

It’s Just a matter of time

Under these circumstances, the perimeter is more likely to be breached; it’s just a matter of time. A bad actor would then be relatively free to move laterally, potentially accessing the privileged intranet and corporate data on-premises and in the cloud. Therefore, we must assume that users and resources on internal networks are as untrustworthy as those on the public internet and design enterprise application security with this in mind. 

Related: Before you proceed, you may find the following posts helpful for pre-information:

  1. Cisco Umbrella CASB
  2. Ericom Shield
  3. SDP Network
  4. Zero Trust Access

 



Remote Browser Isolation (RBI)

Key Remote Browser Isolation Discussion points:


  • The perimeter approach can no longer be trusted. 

  • Software Defined Perimeter and security checking.

  • Mico egmentation.

  • Introducing RBI and its capabilities.

  • The RBI components.

 

Back to basics with remote browser isolation

Remote browser isolation (RBI), also known as web isolation or browser isolation, is a web security solution developed to protect users from Internet-borne threats. So, we have on-premise isolation and remote browser isolation.

On-premise browser isolation functions similarly to remote browser isolation. But instead of taking place on a remote server, which could be in the cloud, the browsing occurs on a server inside the organization’s private network, which could be at the DMZ. So why would you choose on-premise isolation as opposed to remote browser isolation?

Firstly, performance. On-premise isolation can reduce latency compared to some types of remote browser isolation that need to be done in a remote location.

The Concept of RBI

The RBI concept is based on the principle of “trust nothing, verify everything.” By isolating web browsing activity, RBI ensures that any potentially harmful elements, such as malicious scripts, malware, or phishing attempts, cannot reach the user’s device. This approach significantly reduces the attack surface and provides an added layer of protection against threats that may exploit vulnerabilities in the user’s local environment.

So, how does Remote Browser Isolation work in practice? When a user initiates a web browsing session, the RBI solution establishes a secure connection to a remote server instead of directly accessing the website. The remote server acts as a virtual browser, rendering the web page, executing potentially dangerous code, and processing user interactions.

Only the harmless visual representation of the webpage is transmitted back to the user’s device, ensuring that any potential threats are confined to the isolated environment.

Key RBI Advantages

One of the critical advantages of RBI is its ability to protect against known and unknown threats. Since the browsing activity is isolated from the user’s device, even if a website contains an undiscovered vulnerability or a zero-day exploit, the user’s device remains protected. This is particularly valuable in today’s dynamic threat landscape, where new vulnerabilities and exploits are constantly discovered.

Furthermore, RBI offers a seamless user experience, allowing users to interact with web pages just as they would with a traditional browser. Whether it’s submitting forms, watching videos, or accessing web applications, users can perform their desired actions without compromising security. From an IT perspective, RBI also simplifies security management, as it enables centralized control and monitoring of browsing activity, making it easier to identify and address potential threats.

As organizations increasingly adopt cloud-based infrastructure and embrace remote work, Remote Browser Isolation has emerged as a critical security solution. By isolating web browsing activity, businesses can protect their sensitive data, intellectual property, and customer information from cyber threats. RBI significantly reduces the risk of successful attacks, enhances overall security posture, and provides peace of mind to organizations and individuals.

What within the perimeter makes us assume it can no longer be trusted?

Security becomes less and less tenable once there are many categories of users, device types, and locations. Users are diverse, so it is impossible, for example, to slot all vendors into one user segment with uniform permissions.

As a result, access to applications should be based on contextual parameters such as who and where the user is. Sessions should be continuously assessed to ensure they’re legit. 

We need to find ways to decouple security from the physical network and, more importantly, application access from the network. In short, we need a new approach to providing access to the cloud, network, and device-agnostic applications. This is where Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP) comes into the picture.

What is a Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP)?

SDP VPN complements zero trust, which considers internal and external networks and actors untrusted. The network topology is divorced from the trust. There is no concept of inside or outside of the network.

This may result in users not automatically being granted broad access to resources simply because they are inside the perimeter. Primarily, security pros must focus on solutions where they can set and enforce discrete access policies and protections for those requesting to use an application.

SDP lays the foundation and secures the access architecture, which enables an authenticated and trusted connection between the entity and the application. Unlike security based solely on IP, SDP does not grant access to network resources based on a user’s location.

Access policies are based on device, location, state, associated user information, and other contextual elements. Applications are considered abstract, so whether they run on-premise or in the cloud is irrelevant to the security policy.

Periodic Security Checking

Clients and their interactions are periodically checked to comply with the security policy. Periodic security checking protects against additional actions or requests not allowed while the connection is open. For example, let’s say you have a connection open to a financial application, and users access the recording software to record the session.

In this case, the SDP management platform can check whether the software has been started. If so, it employs protective mechanisms to ensure smooth and secure operation.

Microsegmentation

Front-end authentication and periodic checking are one part of the picture. However, we need to go a layer deeper to secure the application’s front door and the numerous doors within, which can potentially create additional access paths. Primarily, this is the job of microsegmentation. Microsegmentation can be performed at all layers of the OSI Model.

data center network microsegmentation

It’s not sufficient to provide network access. We must enable granular application access for dynamic segments of 1. In this scenario, a microsegment is created for every request. Microsegmentation creates the minimal accessible network required to complete specific tasks smoothly and securely. This is accomplished by subdividing more extensive networks into small, secure, and flexible micro-perimeters.

Introducing Remote Browser Isolation (RBI)

SDP provides mechanisms to prevent lateral movement once users are inside the network. However, we must also address how external resources on the internet and public clouds can be accessed while protecting end-users, their devices, and the networks they connect. This is where remote browser isolation (RBI) and technologies such as Single Packet Authorization come into the picture.

What is Remote Browser Isolation? Initially, we started with browser isolation, which protects the user from external sessions by isolating the interaction. Essentially, it generates complete browsers within a virtual machine on the endpoint, providing a proactive approach to isolate users’ sessions from, for example, malicious websites, emails, and links. However, these solutions do not reliably isolate the web content from the end-user’s device on the network.

Remote browser isolation takes local browser isolation to the next level by enabling the rendering process to occur remotely from the user’s device in the cloud. Because only a clean data stream touches the endpoint, users can securely access untrusted websites from within the perimeter of the protected area.

 

Remote Browser Isolation
Diagram: Remote Brower Isolation.

SDP, along with Remote Browser Isolation (RBI)

Remote browser isolation complements the SDP approach in many essential ways. When you access a corporate asset, you operate within the SDP. But when you need to access external assets, RBI is required to keep you safe.

Zero trust and SDP are about authentication, authorization, and accounting (AAA) for internal resources, but secure ways must exist to access external resources. For this, RBI secures browsing elsewhere on your behalf.

No SDP solution can be complete without including rules to secure external connectivity. RBI takes zero trust to the next level by securing the internet browsing perspective. If access is to an internal corporate asset, we create a dynamic tunnel of one individualized connection. For external access, RBI transfers information without full, risky connectivity.

This is particularly crucial when it comes to email attacks like phishing. Malicious actors use social engineering tactics to convince recipients to trust them enough to click on embedded links.

Quality RBI solutions protect users by “knowing” when to allow user access while preventing malware from entering endpoints, entirely blocking malicious sites, or protecting users from entering confidential credentials by enabling read-only access.

The RBI Components

To understand how RBI works, let’s look under the hood of Ericom Shield. With RBI, for every tab a user opens on their device, the solution spins up a virtual browser in its dedicated Linux container in a remote cloud location. For additional information on containers, in particular Docker Container Security.

For example, if the user is actively browsing 19 open tabs on his Chrome browser, each will have a corresponding browser in its remote container. This sounds like it takes a lot of computing power, but enterprise-class  RBI solutions do a lot of optimizations to ensure that it is not eating up too much of the endpoint resources.

If a tab is unused for some time, the associated container is automatically terminated and destroyed. This frees up computing resources and also eliminates the possibility of persistence.

As a result, whatever malware may have resided on the external site being browsed is destroyed and cannot accidentally infect the endpoint, server, or cloud location. When the user shifts back to the tab, he is reconnected in a fraction of a second to the exact location but with a new container, creating a secure enclave for internet browsing. 

Website rendering

Website rendering is carried out in real time from the remote browser. The web page is translated into a media stream, which then gets streamed back to the end-user via HTML5 protocol. In reality, the browsing experience is made out of images. When you look at the source code on the endpoint browser, you will find that the HTML code consists solely of a block of Ericom-generated code. This block manages to send and receive images via the media stream.

Whether the user is accessing the Wall Street Journal or YouTube, they will always get the same source code from Ericom Shield. This is ample proof that no local download, drive-by download, or any other contact that may try to hook up into your endpoint will ever get there, as it does not come into contact with the endpoint. It runs only remotely in a container outside the local LAN. The browser farm does all the heavy — and dangerous — lifting via container-bound browsers that read and execute the user’s uniform resource locator (URL) requests. 

Closing Points: Remote Browser Isolation

SDP vendors have figured out device user authentication and how to secure sessions continuously. However, vendors are now looking for a way to secure the tunnel through to external resource access. 

If you use your desktop to access a cloud application, your session can be hacked or compromised. But with RBI, you can maintain one-to-one secure tunneling. With a dedicated container for each specific app, you are assured of an end-to-end zero-trust environment. 

RBI, based on hardened containers and with a rigorous process to eliminate malware through limited persistence, forms a critical component of the SDP story. Its power is that it stops known and unknown threats, making it a natural evolution from the zero-trust perspective.

In conclusion, remote browser isolation is crucial to enhancing security in the digital era. By isolating web browsing activity from the user’s device, RBI provides an effective defense against a wide range of cyber threats. With its ability to protect against known and unknown threats, RBI offers a proactive approach to cybersecurity, ensuring that organizations and individuals can safely navigate the digital landscape. Remote Browser Isolation will remain vital to a comprehensive security strategy as the threat landscape evolves.

Summary: Remote Browser Isolation

In today’s digital landscape, where cyber threats loom large, ensuring robust web security has become a paramount concern for individuals and organizations. One innovative solution that has gained significant attention is remote browser isolation. In this blog post, we explored the concept of remote browser isolation, its benefits, and its potential to revolutionize web security.

Understanding Remote Browser Isolation

Remote browser isolation is a cutting-edge technology that separates the web browsing activity from the local device, creating a secure environment for users to access the internet. By executing web browsing sessions in isolated containers, any potential threats or malicious code are contained within the remote environment, preventing them from reaching the user’s device.

Enhancing Protection Against Web-Based Attacks

One key advantage of remote browser isolation is its ability to protect users against web-based attacks, such as drive-by downloads, malvertising, and phishing attempts. By isolating the browsing session in a remote environment, even if a user unknowingly encounters a malicious website or clicks on a harmful link, the threat is confined to the isolated container, shielding the user’s device and network from harm.

Mitigating Zero-Day Vulnerabilities

Zero-day vulnerabilities pose a significant challenge to traditional web security measures. These vulnerabilities refer to software flaws that cybercriminals exploit before a patch or fix is available. The risk of zero-day exploits can be significantly mitigated with remote browser isolation. Since the browsing session occurs in an isolated environment, even if a website contains an unknown or unpatched vulnerability, it remains isolated from the user’s device, rendering the attack ineffective.

Streamlining BYOD Policies

Bring Your Device (BYOD) policies have become prevalent in many organizations, allowing employees to use their devices for work. However, this brings inherent security risks, as personal devices may lack robust security measures. By implementing remote browser isolation, organizations can ensure that employees can securely access web-based applications and content without compromising the security of their devices or the corporate network.

Conclusion:

Remote browser isolation holds immense potential to strengthen web security by providing an innovative approach to protecting users against web-based threats. By isolating browsing sessions in secure containers, it mitigates the risks associated with malicious websites, zero-day vulnerabilities, and potential exploits. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, remote browser isolation emerges as a powerful solution to safeguard our online experiences and protect against ever-evolving cyber threats.

Zero trust security for full protection and data safety outline diagram. Labeled educational scheme with network, identity and device verification for safe information protection vector illustration.

Zero Trust: Single Packet Authorization | Passive authorization

by Blog

Single Packet Authorization

In today's fast-paced world, where digital security is paramount, traditional authentication methods are often susceptible to malicious attacks. Single Packet Authorization (SPA) emerges as a powerful solution to enhance the security of networked systems. In this blog post, we will delve into the concept of SPA, its benefits, and how it revolutionizes network security.

Single Packet Authorization is a security technique that adds an extra layer of protection to your network. Unlike traditional methods that rely on passwords or encryption keys, SPA operates on the principle of allowing access to a specific service or resource based on the successful authorization of a single packet. This approach significantly reduces the attack surface and enhances security.

To grasp the inner workings of SPA, it is essential to understand the handshake process. When a connection attempt is made, the server sends a challenge to the client. The client, in turn, must construct a valid response packet using cryptographic algorithms. This response is then verified by the server, granting access if successful. This one-time authorization greatly reduces the chances of unauthorized access and brute-force attacks.

1. Enhanced Security: SPA adds an additional layer of security by limiting access to authorized users only. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access and potential data breaches.

2. Minimal Attack Surface: Unlike traditional authentication methods, which involve multiple packets and handshakes, SPA relies on a single packet. This significantly reduces the attack surface and improves overall security posture.

3. Protection Against DDoS Attacks: SPA can act as a deterrent against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. By requiring successful authorization before granting access, SPA mitigates the risk of overwhelming the network with malicious traffic.

Implementing SPA can be done through various tools and software solutions available in the market. It is crucial to choose a solution that aligns with your specific requirements and infrastructure. Some popular SPA implementations include fwknop, SPAProxy, and PortSentry. These tools offer flexibility, customization, and ease of integration into existing systems.

Matt Conran

Highlights: Single Packet Authorization

Strong authentication and encryption suites are essential components of zero-trust network security. A zero-trust network assumes that the network environment is hostile. No specific recommendations can be made about which suites provide strong security in this book that will stand the test of time. You can use the NIST encryption guidelines to choose strong cipher suites based on security standards.

The types of suites system administrators can choose from may be limited by device and application capabilities. The security of these networks is compromised when administrators weaken these suites.

Authentication MUST be performed on all network flows

Zero-trust networks immediately suspect all packets. Before their data can be processed, they must be rigorously examined. As a primary means of accomplishing this, we rely on authentication.

For network data to be trusted, its provenance must be authenticated. Without it, zero-trust networks are impossible. We would need to trust it if the network weren’t possible.

The Role of Authorization

Authorization is arguably the most critical process in a zero-trust network, so a decision regarding authorization should not be taken lightly. Ultimately, every flow and request will require a decision.

For the authorization decision to be effective, enforcement must be in place. In most cases, it takes the form of a load balancer, a proxy, or a firewall. We use the policy engine to decide which interacts with this component. The enforcement component ensures that clients are authenticated and passes context for each flow/request to the policy engine. By comparing the request and its context with policy, the policy engine informs the enforcer whether the request is permitted. As many enforcement components as possible should exist throughout the system and should be close to the workload.

authorization

Reverse Security 

Even though we are looking at disruptive technology to replace the virtual private network and offer secure segmentation, one thing to keep in mind with zero trust network design and software defined perimeter (SDP) is that it’s not based on entirely new protocols, such as the use of spa single packet authorization and single packet authentication. So we have reversed the idea of how TCP connects.

It started with authentication, and then a connected approach, but traditional networking and protocols still play a large part. For example, we still use encryption to ensure only the receiver can read the data we send. We can, however, use encryption without authentication, which validates the sender.

zero trust environment

The importance of authenticity

However, the two should go together to stand any chance in today’s world. Attackers can circumvent many firewalls and secure infrastructure. As a result, message authenticity is a must for zero trust, and without an authentication process, a bad actor could change, for example, the ciphertext without the reviewer ever knowing.

Encryption and authentication

Even though encryption and authenticity are often intertwined, their purposes are distinct. By encrypting your data, you ensure confidentiality-the promise that only the receiver can read it. Authentication aims to verify that the message was sent by what it claims to be.

It is also interesting to note that authentication has another property. Message authentication requires integrity, essential to validate the sender and ensure the message is unaltered.

Encryption is possible without authentication, though this is a poor security practice.



Single Packet Authentication.

Key Single Packet Authorization Discussion points:


  • The issues with traditional security and networking constructs. TCP connectivity model.

  • Introducing Zero Trust Networking and MTLS.

  • Discussing SPA and its operations.

  • What can SPA offer?

  • Securitiy benefits of introducing SPA.

Related: Before you proceed, you may find the following post helpful:

  1. Identity Security
  2. Zero Trust Access

Back to Basics: Single Packet Authorization (SPA)

SPA: A Security Protocol

Single Packet Authorization (SPA) is a security protocol allowing users to access a secure network without entering a password or other credentials. Instead, it is an authentication protocol that uses a single packet—an encrypted packet of data—to convey a user’s identity and request access. This packet can be sent over any network protocol, such as TCP, UDP, or SCTP, and is typically sent as an additional layer of authentication beyond the network and application layers.

SPA works by having the user’s system send a single packet of encrypted data to the authentication server. The authentication server then uses a unique algorithm to decode the packet containing the user’s identity and request for access. If the authentication is successful, the server will send a response packet that grants access to the user.

SPA is a secure and efficient way to authenticate and authorize users. It eliminates the need for multiple authentication methods and sensitive data storage. SPA is also more secure than traditional authentication methods, as the encryption used in SPA is often more secure than passwords or other credentials.

Additionally, since the packet sent is encrypted, it cannot be intercepted and decoded, making it an even more secure form of authentication.

single packet authorization

The Mechanics of SPA:

SPA operates by employing a shared secret between the client and server. When a client wishes to access a service, it generates a packet containing a specific data sequence, including a timestamp, payload, and cryptographic hash. The server, equipped with the shared secret, checks the received packet against its calculations. If the packet is authentic, the server grants access to the requested service.

Benefits of SPA:

1. Enhanced Security: SPA drastically reduces the attack surface by eliminating the need for open ports or exposed services. Since SPA relies on a single packet, it significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access.

2. Protection against Network Scans: Traditional authentication methods are often vulnerable to network scans that attempt to identify open ports for potential attacks. SPA mitigates this risk by rendering the network invisible to scanning tools.

3. Flexibility and Convenience: SPA allows users to access services from any location, even through firewalls or network address translation (NAT). This flexibility eliminates the need for complex VPN setups or port forwarding configurations.

4. DDoS Mitigation: SPA can effectively mitigate Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks by rejecting packets that do not adhere to the predefined authentication criteria. This helps safeguard the availability of network services.

Implementing SPA:

Implementing SPA requires deploying specialized software or hardware components that support the single packet authorization protocol. Several open-source and commercial solutions are available, making it feasible for organizations of all sizes to adopt this innovative security technique.

Back to Basics: Zero Trust

Five fundamental assertions make up a zero-trust network:

  • Networks are always assumed to be hostile.

  • The network is always at risk from external and internal threats.

  • To determine trust in a network, locality alone is not sufficient.

  • A network flow, device, or user must be authenticated and authorized.

  • Policies must be dynamic and derived from as many data sources as possible to be effective.

In a traditional network security architecture, different networks are divided into firewall-protected zones. It is determined which network resources each zone is permitted to access based on its level of trust. With this model, there is a solid defense in depth. In DMZs, traffic can be tightly monitored and controlled over resources deemed more risky, like those facing the public internet.

Perimeter Defense

Perimeter defenses protecting your network are less secure than you might think. Hosts behind the firewall have no protection, so when a host in the “trusted” zone is breached, which is just a matter of time, access to your data center can be breached. The zero trust movement strives to solve the inherent problems in placing our faith in the network.

Instead, it is possible to secure network communication and access so effectively that the physical security of the transport layer can be reasonably disregarded.

Typically, we examine the IP address of the remote system and ask for a password. Unfortunately, these strategies alone are insufficient for a zero-trust network, where attackers can communicate from any IP and insert themselves between themselves and a trusted remote host. Therefore, utilizing strong authentication on every flow in a zero-trust network is vital. The most widely accepted method is a standard named X.509.

zero trust security
Diagram: Zero trust security. Authenticate first and then connect.

A key aspect of zero-trust network ZTN and zero-trust principles is authenticating and authorizing network traffic, i.e., the flows between the requesting resource and the intended service. Simply securing communications between two endpoints is not enough. Security pros must ensure that each flow is authorized.

This can be done by implementing a combination of security technologies such as Single Packet Authorization (SPA), Mutual Transport Layer Security (MTLS), Internet Key Exchange (IKE), and IP security (IPsec).

IPsec can use a unique security association (SA) per application; only authorized flows can construct security policies. While IPsec is considered to operate at Layer 3 or 4 in the open systems interconnection (OSI) model, application-level authorization can be carried out with X.509 or an access token.

Mutually authenticated TLS (MTLS)

Mutually authenticated TLS (Transport Layer Security) is a system of cryptographic protocols used to establish secure communications over the Internet. It guarantees that the client and the server are who they claim to be, ensuring secure communications between them. This authentication is accomplished through digital certificates and public-private key pairs.

Mutually authenticated TLS is also essential for preventing man-in-the-middle attacks, where a malicious actor can intercept and modify traffic between the client and server. Without mutually authenticated TLS, an attacker could masquerade as the server and thus gain access to sensitive data.

To set up mutually authenticated TLS, the client and server must have digital certificates. The server certificate is used to authenticate the server to the client, while the client certificate is used to authenticate the client to the server. Both certificates are signed by the Certificate Authority (CA) and can be stored in the server and client’s browsers. The client and server then exchange the certificates to authenticate each other.

The client and server can securely communicate once the certificates have been exchanged and verified. Mutually authenticated TLS also provides encryption and integrity checks, ensuring the data is not tampered with in transit.

This enhanced version of TLS, known as mutually authenticated TLS (MTLS), is used to validate both ends of the connection. The most common TLS configuration is the validation, which ensures the client is connected to a trusted entity. However, the authentication doesn’t happen the other way around, so the remote entity communicates with a trusted client. This is the job of mutual TLS. As I said, mutual TLS goes one step further and authenticates the client.

The pre-authentication stage

You can’t attack what you cannot see. The mode that allows pre-authentication is Single Packet Authorization. UDP is the preferred base for pre-authentication because UDP packets, by default, do not receive a response. However, TCP and even ICMP can be used with the SPA. Single Packet Authorization is a next-generation passive authentication technology beyond what we previously had with port knocking, which uses closed ports to identify trusted users. SPA is a step up from port knocking.

The typical port-knocking scenario involves a port-knocking server configuring a packet filter to block all access to a service, such as the SSH service, until a port-knocking client sends a specific port-knocking sequence. For instance, the server could require the client to send TCP SYN packets to the following ports in order: 23400 1001 2003 65501.

If the server monitors this knock sequence, the packet filter reconfigures to allow a connection from the originating IP address. However, port knocking has its limitations, which SPA addresses; SPA retains all of the benefits of port knocking but fixes the rules.

As a next-generation Port Knocking (PK), SPA overcomes many limitations PK exhibits while retaining its core benefits. However, PK has several limitations, including difficulty protecting against replay attacks, the inability to reliably support asymmetric ciphers and HMAC schemes, and the fact that it is trivially easy to mount a DoS attack by spoofing an additional packet into a PK sequence while it is traversing the network (thereby convincing the PK server that the client does not know the proper sequence).

SPA solves all of these shortcomings. As part of SPA, services are hidden behind a default-drop firewall policy, SPA data is passively acquired (usually via libpcap), and standard cryptographic operations are implemented for SPA packet authentication and encryption/decryption.

Firewall Knock Operator

Fwknop (short for the “Firewall Knock Operator”) is a single-packet authorization system designed to be a secure and straightforward way to open up services on a host running an iptables- or ipfw-based firewall. It is a free, open-source application that uses the Single Packet Authorization (SPA) protocol to provide secure access to a network.

Fwknop sends a single SPA packet to the firewall containing an encrypted message with authorization information. The message is then decrypted and compared against a set of rules on the firewall. If the message matches the rules, the firewall will open access to the service specified in the packet.

Fwknop is an ideal solution for users who need to access services on a remote host without having to configure the firewall each time manually. It is also a great way to add an extra layer of security to already open services.

To achieve strong concealment, fwknop implements the SPA authorization scheme. SPA requires only a single packet encrypted, non-replayable, and authenticated via an HMAC to communicate desired access to a service hidden behind a firewall in a default-drop filtering stance. The main application of SPA is to use a firewall to drop all attempts to connect to services such as SSH to make exploiting vulnerabilities (both 0-day and unpatched code) more difficult. Because there are no open ports, any service SPA hides cannot be scanned with, for example, NMAP.

Supported Firewalls

The fwknop project supports four firewalls: We have support for iptables, firewalld, PF, and ipfw across Linux, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, and Mac OS X. There is also support for custom scripts so that fwknop can be made to support other infrastructure such as ipset or nftables.

fwknop client user interface
Diagram: fwknop client user interface. Source mrash GitHub.

Example use case: SSHD protection

Users of Single Packet Authorization (SPA) or its less secure cousin, Port Knocking (PK), usually access SSHD running on the same system as the SPA/PK software. A SPA daemon temporarily permits access to a passively authenticated SPA client through a firewall configured to drop all incoming SSH connections. This is considered the primary SPA usage.

In addition to this primary use, fwknop also makes robust use of NAT (for iptables/firewalld firewalls). A firewall is usually deployed on a single host and acts as a gateway between networks. Firewalls that use NAT (at least for IPv4 communications) commonly provide Internet access to internal networks on RFC 1918 address space and access to internal services by external hosts.

Since fwknop integrates with NAT, users on the external Internet can access internal services through the firewall using SPA. Additionally, it allows fwknop to support cloud computing environments such as Amazon’s AWS, although it has many applications on traditional networks.

SPA Use Case
Diagram: SPA Use Case. Source mrash Github.

Single Packet Authorization and Single Packet Authentication

Single Packet Authorization (SPA) uses proven cryptographic techniques to make internet-facing servers invisible to unauthorized users. Only devices seeded with the cryptographic secret can generate a valid SPA packet and establish a network connection. This is how it reduces the attack surface and becomes invisible to hostile reconnaissance.

SPA Single Packet Authorization was invented over ten years ago and was commonly used for superuser SSH access to servers where it mitigates attacks by unauthorized users. The SPA process happens before the TLS connection, mitigating attacks targeted at the TLS ports.

As mentioned, SDP didn’t invent new protocols; it was more binding existing protocols. SPA used in SDP was based on RFC 4226 HMAC-based One-Time Password “HOTP.” It is another layer of security and is not a replacement for the security technologies mentioned at the start of the post.

Reconnaissance: The first step

The first step in an attack is reconnaissance, whereby an attacker is on the prowl to locate a target. This stage is easy and can be automated with tools such as NMAP. However, SPA ( and port knocking ) employs a default-drop stance that provides service only to those IP addresses that can prove their identity via a passive mechanism.

No TCP/IP stack access is required to authenticate remote IP addresses. Therefore, NMAP cannot tell that a server is running when protected with SPA, and whether the attacker has a zero-day exploit is irrelevant.

 

zero trust security model
Diagram: Zero trust security model.

The idea around SPA and Single Packet Authentication is that a single packet is sent, and based on that packet, an authentication process is carried out. The critical point is that nothing is listening on the service, so you have no open ports. For the SPA service to operate, there is nothing explicitly listening.

When the client sends an SPA packet, it will be rejected, but a second service identifies it in the IP stack and authenticates it. If the SPA packet is successfully authenticated, the server will open a port in the firewall, which could be based on Linux iptables so that the client can establish a secure and encrypted connection with the intended service.

A simple Single Packet Authentication process flow

The SDP network gateway protects assets, and this component could be containerized and listened to for SPA packets. In the case of an open-source version of SDP, this could be fwknop, which is a widespread open-source SPA implementation. When a client wants to connect to a web server, it sends a SPA packet. When the requested service receives the SPA packet, it will open the door once the credentials are verified. However, the service still has not responded to the request.

When the fwknop services receive a valid SPA packet, the contents are decrypted for further inspection. The inspection reveals the protocol and port numbers to which the sender requests access. Next, the SDP gateway adds a rule to the firewall to establish a mutual TLS connection to the intended service. Once this mutual TLS connection is established, the SDP gateway removes the firewall rules, making the service invisible to the outside world.

single packet authorization
Diagram: Single Packet Authorization: The process flow.

Fwknop uses this information to open firewall rules, allowing the sender to communicate with that service on those ports. The firewall will only be opened for some time and can be configured by the administrator. Any attempts to connect to the service must know the SPA packet, and even if the packet can be recreated, the packet’s sequence number needs to be established before the connection. This is next to impossible, considering the sequence numbers are randomly generated.

Once the firewall rules are removed, let’s say after 1 minute, the initial MTLS session will not be affected as it is already established. However, other sessions requesting access to the service on those ports will be blocked. This permits only the sender of the IP address to be tightly coupled with the requested destination ports. It’s also possible for the sender to include a source port, enhancing security even further.

What can Single Packet Authorization offer

Let’s face it: robust security is hard to achieve. We all know that you can never be 100% secure. Just have a look at OpenSSH. Some of the most security-conscious developers developed OpenSSH, yet it occasionally contains exploitable vulnerabilities.

Even when you look at some attacks on TLS, we have already discussed the DigiNotar forgery in a previous post on zero-trust networking. Still, one that caused a significant issue was the THC-SSL-DOS attack, where a single host could take down a server by taking advantage of the asymmetry performance required by the TLS protocol.

Single Packet Authorization (SPA) overcomes many existing attacks and, combined with the enhancements of MTLS with pinned certificates, creates a robust security model addition; SPA defeats many a DDoS attack as only a limited amount of server performance is required to operate.

SPA provides the following security benefits to the SPA-protected asset:

    • SPA blackens the gateway and protects assets that sit behind the gateway. The gateway does not respond to connection attempts until it provides an authentic SPA. Essentially, all network resources are dark until security controls are passed.
    • SPA also mitigates DDoS attacks on TLS. TLS is likely publicly reachable online, and running the HTTPS protocol is highly susceptible to DDoS. SPA mitigates these attacks by allowing the SDP gateway to discard the TLS DoS attempt before entering the TLS handshake. As a result, there will be no exhaustion from targeting the TLS port.
    • SPA assists with attack detection. The first packet to an SDP gateway must be a SPA packet. If a gateway receives any other type of packet, it should be viewed and treated as an attack. Therefore, the SPA enables the SDP to identify an attack based on a malicious packet.

Summary: Single Packet Authorization

In this blog post, we explored the concept of SPA, its key features, benefits, and potential impact on enhancing network security.

Section 1: Understanding Single Packet Authorization

At its core, SPA is a security technique that adds an additional layer of protection to network systems. Unlike traditional methods that rely on usernames and passwords, SPA utilizes a single packet sent to the server to grant access. This packet contains encrypted data and specific authorization codes, ensuring that only authorized users can gain entry.

Section 2: The Key Features of SPA

One of the standout features of SPA is its simplicity. Using a single packet simplifies the process and minimizes the potential attack surface. SPA also offers enhanced security through its encryption and strict authorization codes, making it difficult for unauthorized individuals to gain access. Furthermore, SPA is highly customizable, allowing organizations to tailor the authorization process to their needs.

Section 3: Benefits of Single Packet Authorization

Implementing SPA brings several notable benefits to the table. Firstly, SPA effectively mitigates the risk of brute-force attacks by eliminating the need for traditional login credentials. Additionally, SPA enhances security without sacrificing usability, as users only need to send a single packet to gain access. This streamlined approach saves time and reduces the likelihood of human error. Lastly, SPA provides detailed audit logs, allowing organizations to monitor and track authorized access more effectively.

Section 4: Potential Impact on Network Security

The adoption of SPA has the potential to revolutionize network security. By leveraging this technique, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access, data breaches, and other cybersecurity threats. SPA’s unique approach challenges traditional authentication methods and offers a more robust and efficient alternative.

Conclusion:

Single Packet Authorization (SPA) is a powerful security technique with immense potential to bolster network security. With its simplicity, enhanced protection, and numerous benefits, SPA offers a promising solution for organizations seeking to safeguard their digital assets. By embracing SPA, they can take a proactive stance against cyber threats and build a more secure digital landscape.

Zero Trust Network ZTN

by Blog

Zero Trust Network ZTN

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, ensuring the security and integrity of sensitive data has become more crucial than ever. Traditional security approaches are no longer sufficient to protect against sophisticated cyber threats. This is where the concept of Zero Trust Network (ZTN) comes into play. In this blog post, we will explore the fundamentals of ZTN, its key components, and its significance in enhancing digital security.

Zero Trust Network, often referred to as ZTN, is a security framework that operates on the principle of granting access based on user identity verification and contextual information, rather than blindly trusting a user's location or network. Unlike traditional perimeter-based security models, ZTN treats every user and device as potentially untrusted, thereby minimizing the attack surface and reducing the risk of data breaches.

1. Identity and Access Management (IAM): IAM plays a crucial role in ZTN by providing robust authentication and authorization mechanisms. It ensures that only authorized users with valid credentials can access sensitive resources, regardless of their location or network.

2. Micro-segmentation: Micro-segmentation is another vital component of ZTN that involves dividing the network into smaller segments or zones. Each segment is isolated from others, allowing for granular control over access permissions and minimizing lateral movement within the network.

3. Multi-factor Authentication (MFA): MFA adds an extra layer of security to the ZTN framework by requiring users to provide multiple forms of verification, such as passwords, biometrics, or security tokens. This significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access, even if the user's credentials are compromised.

- Enhanced Security: ZTN provides a proactive security approach by continuously verifying user identity and monitoring their behavior. This significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.

- Improved Compliance: ZTN assists organizations in meeting regulatory compliance requirements by enforcing strict access controls, monitoring user activity, and maintaining comprehensive audit logs.

- Flexibility and Scalability: With ZTN, organizations can easily adapt to changing business needs and scale their security infrastructure without compromising on data protection.

In conclusion, Zero Trust Network (ZTN) represents a paradigm shift in the field of cybersecurity. By adopting a user-centric approach and focusing on identity verification and contextual information, ZTN offers enhanced security, improved compliance, and flexibility to organizations in the modern digital landscape. Embracing ZTN is crucial for staying ahead of evolving cyber threats and safeguarding sensitive data in today's interconnected world.

Matt Conran

Highlights: Zero Trust Network ZTN

Starting a Zero Trust Network

Assessing your network infrastructure thoroughly is the foundation of a robust zero-trust strategy. By mapping out all network elements, including devices, software, and data flows, you can identify security gaps and opportunities for enhancement. Identifying vulnerabilities and determining where and how zero trust principles can be applied effectively requires a comprehensive view of your network’s current state. Any security measures must be aligned with your organization’s specific needs and vulnerabilities to be effective. A clear blueprint of your existing infrastructure will be used to integrate zero trust into your existing network seamlessly.

Scope the design

Before a zero-trust network can be built, it must be appropriately scoped. In a very mature zero-trust network, many systems will interact with each other. The complexity and number of systems may make it difficult for smaller organizations to build these systems.

The goal of a zero trust architecture is to achieve it rather than require it to meet all requirements from the beginning. A perimeter-based network is no different from this. Networks with less maturity may begin with a simple design to reduce administration complexity. As systems mature and breaches become more likely, networks must be redesigned to isolate them further.

Although a zero-trust network design is ideal, not all features are equally valuable. Identifying the components that are necessary and nice to have is essential to ensuring the success of a zero-trust implementation.

Everything is Untrusted

Stop malicious traffic before it even gets on the IP network. In this world of mobile users, billions of connected things, and public cloud applications everywhere – not to mention the growing sophistication of hackers and malware – the Zero Trust Network Design and Zero Trust Security Strategy movement is a new reality. As the name suggests, Zero Trust Network ZTN means no trusted perimeter.

Single Packet Authorization

Everything is untrusted; even after authentication and authorization, a device or user only receives the least privileged access. This is necessary to prevent all potential security breaches. Identity and access management (IAM) is the foundation of excellent IT security and the key to providing zero trust, along with crucial zero-trust technologies such as zero-trust remote access and single-packet authorization.

Before you proceed, you may find the following posts helpful:

  1. Zero Trust SASE
  2. Identity Security
  3. Zero Trust Access

Back to basics with a zero-trust network

A zero-trust network is built upon five essential declarations:

  1. The network is always assumed to be hostile.
  2. External and internal threats exist on the network at all times
  3. Network locality alone is not sufficient for deciding trust in a network.
  4. Every device, user, and network flow is authenticated and authorized.
  5. Policies must be dynamic and calculated from as many data sources as possible.

Critical Principles of Zero Trust Networking:

1. Least Privilege: Zero Trust Networking follows the principle of least privilege, ensuring that users and devices only have access to the resources necessary to perform their specific tasks. This prevents unauthorized access and minimizes the potential impact of a security breach.

2. Micro-Segmentation: Zero Trust Networking emphasizes the concept of micro-segmentation, dividing the network into smaller, isolated segments. By implementing strict access controls between these segments, threats’ lateral movement is contained, reducing the risk of a widespread breach.

3. Continuous Authentication: Zero Trust Networking emphasizes continuous authentication, requiring users to verify their identities at each access attempt. This helps prevent unauthorized access even if login credentials are compromised.

Benefits of Zero Trust Networking:

1. Enhanced Security: Zero Trust Networking significantly reduces the attack surface for potential threats by assuming that no user or device is inherently trustworthy. This approach ensures that even if one part of the network is compromised, the rest remains protected.

2. Improved Compliance: With increasingly stringent data protection regulations, organizations must demonstrate robust security measures. Zero Trust Networking provides a strong framework for ensuring compliance with industry-specific regulations like HIPAA and GDPR.

3. Flexibility and Scalability: Zero Trust Networking can be implemented across various network environments, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid setups. This flexibility allows organizations to adapt their security posture as their infrastructure evolves.

Zero Trust Remote Access

Zero Trust Networking (ZTN) applies zero-trust principles to enterprise and government agency IP networks. Among other things, ZTN integrates IAM into IP routing and prohibits the establishment of a single TCP/UDP session without prior authentication and authorization. Once a session is established, ZTN ensures all traffic in motion is encrypted. In the context of a common analogy, think of our road systems as a network and the cars and trucks on it as IP packets.

Today, anyone can leave his or her house and drive to your home and come up your driveway. That driver may not have a key to enter your home, but he or she can cause it and wait for an opportunity to enter. In a Zero Trust world, no one can leave their house to travel over the roads to their home without prior authentication and authorization. This is required in the digital, virtual world to ensure security.

zero trust remote access
Diagram: Zero trust remote access.

The challenges of the NAC

In the voice world, we use signaling to establish authentication and authorization before connecting the call. In the data world, this can be done with TCP/UDP sessions and, in many cases, in conjunction with Transport Layer Security, or TLS. The problem is that IP routing hasn’t evolved since the mid-‘90s.

IP routing protocols such as Border Gateway Protocol are standalone; they don’t integrate with directories. Network admission control (NAC) is an earlier attempt to add IAM to networking, but it requires a client and assumes a trusted perimeter. NAC is IP address-based, not TCP/UDP session state-based.

Zero trust remote access: Move up the stack 

The solution is to make IP routing more intelligent and bring up the OSI stack to Layer 5, where security and session state reside. The next generation of software-defined networks is taking a more thoughtful approach to networking with Layer 5 security and performance functions.

Over time, organizations have added firewalls, session border controllers, WAN optimizers, and load balancers to networks because they can manage session state and provide the intelligent performance and security controls required in today’s networks.

For instance, firewalls stop malicious traffic in the middle of a network and do nothing within a Layer 2 broadcast domain. Every organization has directory services based on IAM that define who is allowed access to what. Zero Trust Networking takes this further by embedding this information into the network and enabling malicious traffic to be stopped at the source.

zero trust security meaning
Diagram: Zero trust security meaning.

Another great feature of ZTN is anomaly detection. An alert can be generated when a device starts trying to communicate with other devices, services, or applications to which it doesn’t have permission. Hackers use a process of discovery, identification, and targeting to break into systems; with Zero Trust, you can prevent them from starting the initial discovery.

In an era where cyber threats continue to evolve, traditional security models are no longer sufficient to protect sensitive data. Zero Trust Networking offers a paradigm shift in cybersecurity, shifting the focus from trust to verification. Organizations can strengthen their defenses and mitigate the risk of data breaches by adopting the principles of least privilege, micro-segmentation, and continuous authentication. Embracing Zero Trust Networking is a proactive step towards ensuring the security and integrity of critical assets in today’s digital landscape.

Summary: Zero Trust Network ZTN

In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the need for robust cybersecurity measures has never been more critical. One concept that has gained significant attention is the Zero Trust Network (ZTN). In this blog post, we delved into the world of ZTN, its fundamental principles, and how it revolutionizes security protocols.

Understanding Zero Trust Network (ZTN)

Zero Trust Network is a security framework that challenges the traditional perimeter-based security model. It operates on the principle of “never trust, always verify.” Every user, device, or network component is treated as potentially malicious until proven otherwise. By adopting a ZTN approach, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access and data breaches.

Key Components of ZTN

To implement ZTN effectively, several critical components come into play. These include:

1. Micro-segmentation: This technique divides the network into smaller, isolated segments, limiting lateral movement and minimizing the impact of potential security breaches.

2. Multi-factor Authentication (MFA): Implementing MFA ensures that users provide multiple pieces of evidence to verify their identities, making it harder for attackers to gain unauthorized access.

3. Continuous Monitoring: ZTN relies on real-time monitoring and analysis of network traffic, user behavior, and device health. This enables prompt detection and response to any anomalies or potential threats.

Benefits of ZTN Adoption

By embracing ZTN, organizations can reap numerous benefits, such as:

1. Enhanced Security: ZTN’s strict access controls and continuous monitoring significantly reduce the risk of successful cyberattacks, protecting critical assets and sensitive data.

2. Improved Agility: ZTN enables organizations to embrace cloud-based services, remote work, and BYOD policies without compromising security. It provides granular control over access privileges, ensuring only authorized users can access specific resources.

3. Simplified Compliance: ZTN aligns with various regulatory frameworks and industry standards, helping organizations meet compliance requirements more effectively.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the Zero Trust Network (ZTN) is a game-changer in cybersecurity. By adopting a ZTN approach, organizations can fortify their defenses against the ever-evolving threat landscape. With its focus on continuous monitoring, strict access controls, and micro-segmentation, ZTN offers enhanced security, improved agility, and simplified compliance. As organizations strive to protect their digital assets, ZTN is a powerful solution in the fight against cyber threats.