Load Balancer Scaling

How to scale the load balancer? When considering load balancer scaling and scalability, we need to recap the basics of scaling load balancers. A load balancer is a device that distributes network traffic across multiple servers. It provides an even distribution of traffic across multiple servers, so no single server is overloaded with requests. This helps to improve overall system performance and reliability. Load balancers can balance traffic between multiple web servers, application servers, and databases.

Geographic Locations

They can also be used to balance traffic between different geographic locations. Load balancers are typically configured to use round-robin, least connection, or source-IP affinity algorithms to determine how to distribute traffic. They can also be configured to use health checks to ensure that only healthy servers receive traffic. By distributing the load across multiple servers, the load balancer helps reduce the risk of server failure and improve overall system performance.

Load Balancers and the OSI Model

Load balancers operate at different Open Systems Interconnection ( OSI ) Layers from one data center to another; joint operation is between Layer 4 and Layer 7. The load balance function becomes the virtual representation of the application. Internal applications are represented by a virtual IP address ( VIP ). VIP acts as a front-end service to external clients’ requests. Data centers host unique applications with different requirements. Therefore, load balancing and scalability will vary depending on the housed applications.

Understanding the Application

For example, every application is unique regarding the number of sockets, TCP connections ( short-lived or long-lived ), idle time-out, and activities in each session regarding packets per second. Therefore, understanding the application structure and protocols is one of the most critical elements in determining how to scale the load balancer and design an effective load-balancing solution. 

Scaling Up

Scaling up is quite common for applications that need more power. Perhaps the database has grown so large that it no longer fits in memory, the disks may be full, or the database may be handling more requests and requiring more processing power than it used to.

Databases have traditionally been difficult to run on multiple machines, making them an excellent example of scaling up. When you try to make something work on two or more machines, many things that work on a single machine don’t. Do you know how to share tables efficiently across machines, for example? MongoDB and CouchDB are two new databases designed to work entirely differently since this is a challenging problem to solve.

Scaling Out

It’s here that things start to get interesting, which is why you picked up this book in the first place. In scaling out, you have multiple machines rather than a single one. The problem with scaling up is that you eventually reach a point where you can’t go any further. The capability of a single machine limits memory and processing power. If you need more than that, what should you do?

A single machine can’t handle so many visitors that people will tell you you’re in an envious position. You wouldn’t believe how nice it is to have such a problem! One of the great things about scaling out is that you can keep adding machines. Scaling out will certainly result in more compute power than scaling up, but you will run into space and power issues at some point.

Before you proceed, you may find the following post helpful:

1. Auto Scaling Observability
2. DNS Security Solutions
3. Application Delivery Network
4. Overlay Virtual Networking
5. Dynamic Workload Scaling
6. GTM Load Balancer

Back to basics with load balancers and load balancing

Availability:

Load balancing plays a significant role in maintaining high availability for websites and applications. By distributing traffic across multiple servers, load balancers ensure that even if one server fails, others can continue handling incoming requests. This redundancy helps to minimize downtime and ensures uninterrupted service for users. In addition, load balancers can also perform health checks on servers, automatically detecting and redirecting traffic away from malfunctioning or overloaded servers, further enhancing availability.

Efficiency:

Load balancers optimize the utilization of computing resources by intelligently distributing incoming requests based on predefined algorithms. This even distribution prevents any single server from being overwhelmed, improving overall system performance. By utilizing load balancing, businesses can ensure that their servers operate optimally, using available resources and minimizing the risk of performance degradation or system failures.

Scale up and scale out

How is this like load balancing in the computing world? It all comes down to having finite resources and attempting to make the best potential use of them. For example, you may have the goal of making your websites fast; to do that, you must route your requests to the machines best capable of handling them. To get around this, you need more resources.

For example, you can buy a giant machine to replace your current server, known as scale-up and pricey, or another small device that works alongside your existing server, known as scale-out. As noted, the biggest challenge in load balancing is trying to make many resources appear as one. So we can have load balancing with DNS, content delivery networks, and HTTP load balancing. We also need to balance our database and network connections.

Lab Guide on Gateway Load Balancing Protocol (GLBP)

GLBP is running between R1 and R2. The switch is not running GLPB and is used as an interconnection point. GLBP is often used internally between access layer switches and outside the data center. It is similar in operation to HSRP and VRRP. Notice that when we changed the priority of R2, its role changed to Active instead of Standby.

What is Load Balancer Scaling?

Load balancer scaling refers to the process of dynamically adjusting the resources allocated to a load balancer to meet the changing demands of an application. As the number of users accessing an application increases, load balancer scaling ensures that the incoming traffic is distributed evenly across multiple servers, preventing any single server from becoming overwhelmed.

The Benefits of Load Balancer Scaling:

1. Enhanced Performance: Load balancers distribute incoming traffic among multiple servers, improving resource utilization and response times. By preventing any single server from overloading, load balancer scaling ensures a smooth user experience even during peak traffic.

2. High Availability: Load balancers play a crucial role in maintaining high availability by intelligently distributing traffic to healthy servers. If one server fails, the load balancer automatically redirects the traffic to the remaining servers, preventing service disruption.

3. Scalability: Load balancer scaling allows applications to quickly accommodate increased traffic without manual intervention. As the server load increases, additional resources are automatically allocated to handle the extra load, ensuring that the application can scale seamlessly as per the demands.

Load Balancer Scaling Strategies:

1. Vertical Scaling: This strategy involves increasing individual servers’ resources (CPU, RAM, etc.) to handle higher traffic. While vertical scaling can provide immediate relief, it has limitations in terms of scalability and cost-effectiveness.

2. Horizontal Scaling: Horizontal scaling involves adding more servers to the application infrastructure to distribute the incoming traffic. Load balancers are critical in effectively distributing the load across multiple servers, ensuring optimal resource utilization and scalability.

3. Auto Scaling: Auto-scaling automatically adjusts the number of application instances based on predefined conditions. By monitoring various metrics like CPU utilization, network traffic, and response times, auto-scaling ensures that the application can handle increased traffic loads without manual intervention.

Best Practices for Load Balancer Scaling:

1. Monitor and Analyze: Regularly monitor your application’s and load balancer’s performance metrics to identify any bottlenecks or areas of improvement. Analyzing the data will help you make informed decisions regarding load balancer scaling.

2. Implement Redundancy: To ensure high availability, deploy multiple load balancers in different availability zones. This redundancy ensures that even if one load balancer fails, the application remains accessible through the remaining ones.

3. Regularly Test and Optimize: Conduct load testing to simulate heavy traffic scenarios and verify the performance of your load balancer scaling setup. Optimize the configuration based on the test results to ensure optimal performance.

Example: Direct Server Return. 

Direct server return (DSR) is an advanced networking technology that allows servers to send data directly to a client computer without going through an intermediary. This provides a more efficient and secure data transmission between the two, leading to faster speeds and better security.
DSR is also known as loopback, direct routing, or reverse path forwarding. It is essential in various applications, such as online gaming, streaming video, voice-over-IP (VoIP) services, and virtual private networks (VPNs).

For example, the Real-Time Streaming Protocol ( RTSP ) is an application-level network protocol for multimedia transport streams. It is used in entertainment and communications systems to control streaming media servers. With this application requirement case, the initial client connects with TCP; however, return traffic from the server can be UDP, bypassing the load balancer. For this scenario, the load-balancing method of Direct Server Return is a viable option.

DSR is an excellent choice for high-speed, secure data transmission applications. It can also help reduce latency and improve reliability. For example, DSR can help reduce lag and improve online gaming performance.

How to scale load balancer

This post will first address the different load balancer scalability options: scale-up and scale-out. Scale-out is generally the path of scaling load balancers we see today, mainly as the traffic load, control, and data plane are spread across VMs or containers that are easy to spin up and down, commonly seen for absorbing DDoS attacks.

We will then discuss how to scale load balancer and the scalability options in the application and at a network load balancing level. We will finally address the different design options for load balancing, such as user session persistence, destination-only NAT, and persistent HTTP sessions.

Scaling a load balancer lets you adjust its performance to its workload by changing the number of nodes it contains. You can scale the load balancer up or down at any time to meet your traffic needs. So, when considering how to scale a load balancer, you must first look at the application requirements and work it out from there. What load do you expect?

In the diagram below, we see the following.

• Virtual IP address: A virtual IP address is an IP address that is used to virtualize a computer’s identity on a local area network (LAN). The network address translation (NAT) form allows multiple devices to share a public IP address.
• Load Balancer Function: The load balancer is configured to receive client requests and route them to the most appropriate server based on a defined algorithm.

The primary benefit of load balancer scaling is that it provides scalability. Scalability is the ability of a networking device or application to handle organic and planned network growth. Scalability is the main advantage of load balancing, and in terms of application capacity, it increases the number of concurrent requests data centers can support. So, in summary, load balancing is the ability to distribute incoming workloads to multiple end stations based on an algorithm.

Load balancers also provide several additional features. For example, they can be configured to detect and remove unhealthy servers from the pool of available servers. They also offer SSL encryption, which can help to protect sensitive data being passed between clients and servers. Finally, they can perform other tasks like URL rewriting and content caching.

Load Balancing with Routers

Load Balancing is not limited to load balancer devices. Routers also perform load balancing with routing. Across all Cisco IOS® router platforms, load balancing is a standard feature. The router automatically activates this feature when multiple routes to a destination are in the routing table.

Routing Information Protocol (RIP), RIPv2, Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), and Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (IGRP) are standard routing protocols or derived from static routing and packet forwarding protocols. When forwarding packets, RIP allows a router to use multiple paths.

• For process-switching — load balancing is on a per-packet basis, and the asterisk (*) points to the interface over which the next packet is sent.
• For fast-switching — load balancing is on a per-destination basis, and the asterisk (*) points to the interface over which the next destination-based flow is sent.

Load Balancer Scalability

Scaling load balancers with Scale-Up or Scale-Out

a) Scale-up—Expand linearly by buying more servers, adding CPU and memory, etc. Scale-up is usually done on transaction database servers as these servers are difficult to scale out. Scaling up is a simple approach but the most expensive and nonlinear. Old applications were upgraded by scaling up ( vertical scaling )—a rigid approach that is not elastic. In a virtualized environment, applications are scaled linearly in a scale-out fashion.

b) Scale-out—Add more parallel servers, i.e., scale linearly. Scaling out is more accessible on web servers; add additional web servers as needed. Netflix is an example of a company that designs by scale-out. It spins up Virtual Machines ( VM ) on-demand due to daily changes in network load. Scaling out is elastic and requires a load-balancing component. It is an agile approach to load balancing.

Shared states limit the scalability of scale-out architectures, so try to share and lock as few states as possible. An example of server locking is Amazon’s eventual consistency approach, which limits the amount of transaction locking—shopping cards are not checked until you click “buy.”

• Additional information: Scale up load balancing

A load balancer scale-up is the process of increasing the capacity of a load balancer by adding more computing resources. This can increase the system’s scalability or provide redundancy in case of system failure. The primary goal of scaling up a load balancer is to ensure the system can handle the increased workload without compromising performance.

Scaling up a load balancer involves adding more hardware and software resources, such as CPUs, RAM, and hard disks. These resources will enable the system to process requests more quickly and efficiently. When scaling up a load balancer, consider its architecture and the types of requests it will handle.

Different types of requests require different computing resources. For example, if the load balancer handles high-volume requests, it is essential to ensure that the system has enough CPUs and RAM to handle them.

Considering the network topology when scaling up a load balancer is also essential. The network topology defines how the load balancer will communicate with other systems, such as web servers and databases. If the network topology is not configured correctly, the system may be unable to handle the increased load.  Finally, monitoring the system after scaling up a load balancer is essential. This will ensure that the system performs as expected and that the increased capacity is used effectively. Monitoring the system can also help detect potential issues or performance bottlenecks.

By scaling up a load balancer, organizations can increase the scalability and redundancy of their system. However, it is essential to consider the architecture, types of requests, network topology, and monitoring when scaling up a load balancer. This will ensure the system can handle the increased workload without compromising performance.

• Additional information: Scale-out load balancing

Scaling out a load balancer adds additional load balancers to distribute incoming requests evenly across multiple nodes. The process of scaling out a load balancer can be achieved in various ways. Organizations can use virtualization or cloud-based solutions to add additional load balancers to their existing systems. Some organizations prefer to deploy their servers or use their existing hardware to scale the load balancer.

Regardless of the chosen method, the primary goal should be to create a reliable and efficient system that can handle increasing requests. This can be done by evenly distributing the load across multiple nodes, ensuring that every node is manageable and manageable. Additionally, organizations should consider deploying additional load balancer resources, such as memory, disk space, or CPU cores.

Finally, organizations should constantly monitor the load balancer’s performance to ensure the system runs optimally. This can be done by tracking the load-balancing performance, analyzing the response time of requests, and providing that the system can handle unexpected spikes in traffic.

Load Balancer Scalability: The Operations

The virtual IP address and load balancing control plane

Outside is a VIP, and inside is a pool of servers. A load balancer scaling device is configured for rules associating outside IP and port numbers with an inside pool of servers. Clients only know the outside IP address through, for example, DNS replies. The load-balancing control plane monitors the servers’ health and determines which can accept requests.

The client sends a TCP SYN packet, which the load balancer device intercepts. The load balancer performs a load-balancing algorithm and sends it to the best server destination. To get the request to the server, you can use Tunnelling, NAT, or two TCP sessions. In some cases, the load balancer will have to rewrite the content. Whatever the case, the load balancer has to create a session to know that this client is associated with a particular inside server.

Local and global load balancing

Local server selection occurs within the data center based on server load and application response times. Any application that uses TCP or UDP protocols can be load-balanced. Whereas local load balancing determines the best device within a data center, global load balancing chooses the best data center to service client requests.

Global load balancing is supported through redirection based on  DNS and HTTP. HTTP mechanism provides better control, while DNS is fast and scalable. Both local and global appliances work hand-in-hand; the local device feeds information to the global device, enabling it to make better load-balancing decisions.

Load Balancer Scaling Types

Application-Level Load Balancer Scalability: Load balancing is implemented between tiers in the applications stack and carried out within the application. It is used in scenarios where applications are coded correctly, making it possible to configure load balancing in the application. Designers can use open-source tools with DNS or another method to track flows between tiers of the application stack.

Network-Level Load Balancer Scalability: Network-level load balancing includes DNS round-robin, Anycast, and Layer 4 – Layer 7 load balancers. Web browser clients do not usually have built-in application layer redundancy, which pushes designers to look at the network layer for load-balancing services. If applications were designed correctly, load balancing would not be a network-layer function.

Application-level load balancing

Application-level load balancer scaling concerns what we can do inside the application to provide load-balancing services. The first thing you can do is scale up—add a more worker process. Clients issue requests that block some significant worker processes and that resource is tied to TCP sessions. If your application requires session persistence ( long-lived TCP sessions ), you block worker processes even if the client is not sending data. The solution is FastCGI or changing the webserver to Nginx.

• A key point: Nginx

Nginx is event-based. On Apache ( not event-based), every TCP connection consumes a worker process, but with Nginx, a client connection takes no processes unless you are processing an actual request. Generally, Linux is poor at processing many simultaneous requests.

Nginx does not use threads and can easily have 100,000 connections. With Apache, you lose 50% of the performance, and adding CPU doesn’t help. With around 80,000 connections, you will experience severe performance problems no matter how many CPUs you add. Nginx is by far a better solution if you expect a lot of simultaneous connections.

Example: Load Balancing with Auto Scaling groups on AWS.

The following looks at an example of load balancing in AWS. Registering your Auto Scaling group with an Elastic Load Balancing load balancer helps you set up a load-balanced application. Elastic Load Balancing works with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling to distribute incoming traffic across your healthy Amazon EC2 instances.

This increases your application’s scalability and availability. In addition, you can enable Elastic Load Balancing within multiple Availability Zones to increase your application’s fault tolerance. Elastic Load Balancing supports different types of load balancers. A recommended load balancer is the Application Load Balancer.

Network-based load balancing

First, try to solve the load balancer scaling in the application. When you cannot load balance solely using applications, turn to the network for load-balancing services. 

DNS round-robin load balancing

The most accessible type of network-level load balancing is DNS round robin. DNS server that keeps track of application server availability. The DNS control plane distributes user traffic over multiple servers round-robin. However, it does come with caveats:

1. DNS does not know server health.
2. DNS caching problems.
3. No measures are available to prevent DoS attacks against servers.

Clients ask for the IP of the web server, and the DNS server replies with an IP address in random order. This works well if the application uses DNS. However, some applications use hard-coded IP addresses; you can’t rely on DNS-based load balancing in these scenarios.

DNS load balancing also requires low TTL times, so the client will often ask the servers. Generally, DNS-based load balancing works well, but not with web browsers. Why? DNS pinning.

DNS pinning

This is because there have been so many attacks on web browsers, and browsers now implement a security feature called DNS pinning. DNS pinning is a method whereby you get the server’s IP address, and even though the TTL has expired, you ignore the DNS TTL and continue to use the URL.

It prevents people from spoofing DNS records and is usually built-in to browsers. DNS load balancing is perfect if the application uses DNS and listens to DNS TTL times. But unfortunately, web browsers are not in that category.

IP Anycast load balancing

IP Anycast provides geographic server load balancing. The idea is to use the same IP address on multiple POPs. Routing in the core will choose the closest POP, routing the client to the nearest POP. All servers have the same IP address configured on loopback.

Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) replies would clash if the same IP address were configured on the LAN interface. Use any routing mechanism to generate an Equal Cost Multi-Path (ECMP) for loopback addresses. For example, static routes are based on IP SLA, or you can use OSPF between the server and router.

Best for UDP traffic

The router will load balance based on a 5-tuple as requests come in. Do not load the balance on destination addresses /ports, as they are always the same. It is usually done using the source client’s IP address/port number. The process takes the 5-tuple and creates a hash value, which makes independent paths based on that value. This works well for UDP traffic and how root servers work. It is also good for DNS server load balancing.

It works well for UDP as every request from the client is independent. TCP does not work like this, as TCP has sessions. It recommended not to use Anycast load balancing for TCP traffic. You need an actual load balancer if you want to load-balance TCP traffic. This could be a software package, Open Source ( HAproxy ), or a dedicated appliance.

Scaling load balancers at Layer 2

Layer 2 designs refer to the load balancer in bridged mode. As a result, all load-balanced and non-load-balanced traffic to and from the servers goes through the load-balancing device. The device bridges two VLANs together in the same IP subnet. Essentially, the load balancer acts as a crossover cable, merging two VLANs.

The critical point is that the client and server sides are in the same subnet. As a result, layer 2 implementations are much more accessible than layer 3 implementations, as there are no changes to IP addresses, netmasks, and default gateway settings on servers. However, with a bridged design, be careful about introducing loops and implementing spanning tree protocol ( STP ).

Scaling load balancers at Layer 3 

With layer 3 designs, the load-balancing device acts in routed mode. Therefore, all load-balanced and non-load-balanced traffic to and from the server goes through the load-balancing device. The device routes between two different VLANs that are in two different subnets.

The critical point and significant difference between layer 3 and layer 2 designs are client-side VLANs and server-side VLANs in different subnets. Therefore, the VLANs are not merged, and the load-balancing device routes between VLANs. Layer 3 designs may be more complex to implement but will eventually be more scalable in the long run.

Scaling load balancers with One-ARM mode

One-armed mode refers to a load-balancing device, not in the forwarding path. The critical point is that the load balancer resides on its subnet and has no direct connectivity with server-side VLAN. A vital advantage of this model is that only load-balanced traffic goes through the device.

Server-initiated traffic bypasses the load balancer and changes both source and destination IP addresses. The load balancer terminates outside TCP sessions and initiates new inside TCP sessions. When the client connection comes in, you take the source IP and port number, put them in connection tables, and associate them with the load balancer’s TCP port number and IP.

As everything comes from the load balance IP address, the servers can no longer see the original client. On the right-hand side of the diagram below, the source and destination traffic flow on the server side is the load balancer. The VIP addresses 10.0.0.1, and that is what the client connects to.

The use of X-forwarder-for HTTP header

We use the X-forwarder-for HTTP header to indicate to the server which the original client is. The client’s IP address is replaced with the load balancer’s IP address. The load balancer can insert the X-Forwarders-for HTTP header, where they copy the client’s original IP address into the extra HTTP header—“X-forward-for header.” Apache has a standard that copies the value of this header into the standard CGI variable so all the scripts can pretend no load balancer exists.

The load balancer inserts data into the TCP session; in other words, it has to take ownership of the TCP sessions, so it needs to take control of TCP activities, including buffering, fragmentation, and reassembling. Modifying HTTP requests is hard. F5 has an accelerated mode of TCP load balancing.

Scaling load balancers with Direct Server Return

Direct Server Return is when the same IP address is configured on all hosts. The same IP is configured on the loopback interface, not the LAN interface. The LAN IP address is only used for ARP, so the load balancer would send ARP requests only for the LAN IP address, rewrite the MAC header ( not TCP or HTTP alterations ), and send the unmodified IP packet to the selected server.

The server sends the reply to the client and does not involve the load balancer. As load balancing is done on the MAC address, it requires layer 2 connectivity between the load balancer and servers ( example: Linux Virtual Server ). Also, a tunneling method that uses Layer 3 between the load balancer and servers is available.

• A key point: MTU issues

If you do not have layer 2 connectivity, you can use tunnels, but be aware of MTU issues. Make sure the Maximum Segment Size ( MSS ) on the server is reduced so you do not have a PMTU issue between the client and server.

With direct server return, how do you ensure the reply is from the loopback, not the LAN address? If you are using TCP, the TCP session’s IP address is dictated by the original TCP SYN packet, so this is automatic.

However, UDP is different as UDP leaving is different from UDP coming in. So, in UDP cases, you need to set the IP address manually with the application or with iptables. But for TCP, the source in the reply is always copied from the destination IP address in the original TCP SYN request.

Scaling load balancers with Microsoft network load balancing

Microsoft load balancing is the ability to implement load balancing without load balancers. Instead, create a cluster IP address for the server and then use the flooding behavior to send it to all servers. 

Clients send a packet to the shared cluster IP address associated with a client’s MAC address. This cluster MAC does not exist anywhere. When the request arrives at the last Layer 3 switch, it sends an ARP request: “Who has this IP address?”?.

ARP requests arrive at all the servers. So, when the client packet arrives, it is sent to the cluster’s bogus MAC address. Because the MAC address has never been associated with any source, all the traffic is flooded from the Layer 2 switch to the servers. The performance of the Layer 2 switch falls massively as unicast flooding is done in software.

The use of Multicast

Microsoft then changed this to use Multicast. This does not work, and packets are dropped as an illegal source of MAC when using a multicast MAC address. Cisco routers drop ARP packets with the source MAC address as multicast. To overcome this, configure static ARP entries. Microsoft also implements IGMP to reduce flooding.

Load Balancing Options

User session persistence ( Stickiness )

The load balancer must keep all session states, even for inactive sessions. Session persistence creates much more state than just the connection table. Some web applications store client session data on the servers, so sessions from the same client must go to the same server. This is particularly important when SSL is deployed for encryption or where shopping carts are used.

The client establishes an HTTP session with the webserver and logs in. After login, the HTTPS session from the same client should land on the same web server to which the client logged in using the initial HTTP request. The following are ways load balancers can determine who the source client is.

• Source IP address – > Problem may arise with large-scale NAT designs.
• Extra HTTP cookies – > May require the load balancer to take ownership of the TCP session.
• SSL session ID -> The session Will remain persistent even if the client is roaming and the client’s IP address changes.

Data path programming

F5 uses scripts that act on packets, triggering the load-balancing mechanism. You can select the server, manipulate HTTP headers, or even manipulate content. For example, the load balancer can add caching headers in MediaWiki (which does not change content / caching headers ). The load balancer adds the headers that allow the content to be cached.

Persistent HTTP sessions

The client has a long-lived HTTP session to eliminate one RTT and congestion window problem; then, we have a short-lived session from the load balancer to the server. SPDY is a next-generation HTTP with multiple HTTP sessions over one TCP session. This is useful in high-latency environments such as mobile devices. F5 has a SPDY-to-HTTP gateway.

Destination-only NAT

The server rewrites the destination IP address to the actual server’s destination IP and then forwards the packet. The reply packet has to hit the load balancer, as the load balancer has to replace the server’s source IP with the load balancer’s source IP. The client IP does not change, so the server talks directly with the client. This allows the server to do address-based access control or GEO location based on the source address.

Recap: How to scale load balancer

This post first addressed the different load balancer scalability options, which consist of scale-up and scale-out. Scale-out is generally the path of scaling load balancers we see today. It is less expensive and easier to perform. We then discussed how to scale the application’s load balancer and the load balancer scalability options and load balancing at a network level.

We also discussed the different design types of load balancing, such as user session persistence, destination-only NAT, and persistent HTTP sessions. Several videos were included that could provide more details on scaling load balancers.

So, when you ask yourself how to scale a load balancer, the first step is to examine the application. Can this be solved in the application, or do we need to push this to the network layer? Both have pros and cons.

Types of Load Balancing:

There are various load-balancing techniques, each suited for different scenarios. Two common types are:

1. Round-robin: In this method, incoming requests are distributed sequentially across available servers, ensuring an even workload distribution. However, this technique does not consider the current server load, which might lead to uneven resource utilization.

2. Dynamic load balancing: This technique considers the current server load and distributes incoming requests based on server capacity, response time, or CPU utilization. This dynamically adjusting workload distribution method ensures optimal resource utilization and improved performance.

In today’s technology-driven world, where downtime and performance degradation can have severe consequences, load balancing has become an essential component of modern computing. With its ability to enhance scalability, availability, and efficiency, load balancing ensures businesses can handle increased traffic, maintain high availability, and optimize resource utilization. By implementing load-balancing techniques, organizations can achieve a robust and reliable digital infrastructure, providing a seamless user experience and staying ahead in the competitive digital landscape.