What does SDN mean

BGP has a new friend – BGP-Based SDN

BGP-Based SDN

The world of networking continues to evolve rapidly, with new technologies and approaches emerging to meet the growing demands of modern communication. Two such technologies, BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) and SDN (Software-Defined Networking), have gained significant attention for their impact on network flexibility and management. In this blog post, we will delve into the fascinating intersection of BGP and SDN, exploring how they work together to empower network administrators and optimize network operations.

Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) serves as the backbone of the internet, facilitating the exchange of routing information between networks. BGP enables dynamic routing, allowing routers to determine the best paths for data transmission based on various factors such as network policies, path preferences, and traffic conditions. It plays a crucial role in inter-domain routing, where multiple networks connect and exchange data.

Software-Defined Networking (SDN) introduces a paradigm shift in network management by decoupling the control plane from the data plane. In traditional networks, network devices such as switches and routers possess both control and data plane functionalities. SDN separates these functions, with a centralized controller managing the network's behavior and forwarding decisions. The data plane, consisting of switches and routers, simply follows the instructions provided by the controller.

When BGP and SDN converge, we unlock a new realm of network possibilities. SDN's centralized control and programmability complement BGP's routing capabilities, offering enhanced flexibility and control over network operations. By leveraging SDN controllers, network administrators can dynamically adjust BGP routing policies, optimize traffic flows, and respond to changing network conditions in real-time. This dynamic interaction between BGP and SDN empowers organizations to adapt their networks to ever-evolving requirements efficiently.

The combination of BGP and SDN brings forth several advantages and opens up exciting use cases. Network operators can implement traffic engineering techniques to optimize network paths, improve performance, and minimize congestion. They can also utilize SDN's programmability to automate BGP configuration and provisioning, reducing human errors and accelerating network deployment. Additionally, BGP-SDN integration facilitates the implementation of policies for traffic prioritization, security, and load balancing.

The convergence of BGP and SDN represents a powerful synergy that empowers network administrators to achieve unprecedented levels of flexibility, control, and efficiency. By combining BGP's robust routing capabilities with SDN's programmability and centralized management, organizations can adapt their networks swiftly to meet evolving demands. As the networking landscape continues to evolve, the BGP-SDN combination will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping the future of network architecture.

Highlights: BGP-Based SDN

Understanding BGP and SDN

1- BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) is a routing protocol used to exchange routing information between different networks on the internet. On the other hand, SDN is an architectural approach that separates the control plane from the data plane, allowing network administrators to centrally manage and configure networks through software.

2- BGP-based SDN combines the power of BGP routing with the flexibility and programmability of SDN. Network operators gain enhanced control, scalability, and agility in managing their networks by leveraging BGP as the control plane protocol in an SDN architecture. This marriage of BGP and SDN opens up new possibilities for network automation, policy-driven routing, and dynamic traffic engineering.

3- One critical advantage of BGP-based SDN is its ability to simplify network management. With centralized control and programmability, network operators can define policies and rules that govern their networks’ behavior.

4- This paves the way for efficient traffic engineering and the ability to respond dynamically to changing network conditions. Additionally, BGP-based SDN provides better scalability, allowing for the distribution of control plane functions across multiple controllers.

BGP SDN Challenges:

While BGP-based SDN holds immense potential, it also poses certain challenges. One of the primary concerns is the complexity of implementation and migration. Integrating BGP with SDN requires careful planning and coordination to ensure a smooth transition. Moreover, security and privacy considerations must be considered when deploying BGP-based SDN, as centralized control introduces new attack vectors that must be mitigated.

Critical Components of BGP SDN:

a. BGP Routing: BGP SDN leverages the BGP protocol to manage the routing decisions between different networks. This enables efficient and optimized routing and seamless communication across various domains.

b. SDN Controller: The SDN controller acts as the centralized brain of the network, providing a single point of control and management. It enables network administrators to define and enforce network policies, configure routing paths, and allocate network resources dynamically.

c. OpenFlow Protocol: BGP SDN uses the OpenFlow protocol to communicate between the SDN controller and the network switches. OpenFlow enables the controller to programmatically control the forwarding behavior of switches, resulting in greater flexibility and agility.

Benefits of BGP SDN:

a. Enhanced Flexibility: BGP SDN allows network administrators to tailor their network infrastructure to meet specific requirements. With centralized control, network policies can be easily modified or updated, enabling rapid adaptation to changing business needs.

b. Improved Scalability: Traditional network architectures often struggle to handle the growing demands of modern applications. BGP SDN provides a scalable solution by enabling dynamic allocation of network resources, optimizing traffic flow, and ensuring efficient bandwidth utilization.

c. Simplified Network Management: BGP SDN’s centralized management simplifies network operations. Network administrators can configure, monitor, and manage the entire network from a single interface, reducing complexity and improving overall efficiency.

Use Cases for BGP SDN:

a. Data Centers: BGP SDN is well-suited for data center environments, where rapid provisioning, scalability, and efficient workload distribution are critical. By leveraging BGP SDN, data centers can seamlessly integrate physical and virtual networks, enabling efficient resource allocation and workload migration.

b. Service Providers: BGP SDN allows service providers to offer their customers flexible and customizable network services. It enables the creation of virtual private networks, traffic engineering, and service chaining, resulting in improved service delivery and customer satisfaction.

BGP Technologies in BGP SDN

Understanding BGP Route Reflection

A – 🙂 BGP route reflection is a technique used to alleviate the burden of full-mesh connectivity in BGP networks. Traditionally, in a fully meshed BGP configuration, all routers must establish a direct peer-to-peer connection with every other router, resulting in complex and resource-intensive setups. Route reflection introduces a hierarchical approach that reduces the number of required connections, providing a more scalable alternative.

B – 🙂 Route reflectors act as centralized points within a BGP network and reflect and propagate routing information to other routers. They collect BGP updates from their clients and reflect them to other clients, ensuring a simplified and efficient distribution of routing information. Route reflectors maintain the overall consistency of the BGP network while reducing the number of required peer connections.

C- 🙂 To implement BGP route reflection, one or more routers within the network need to be configured as route reflectors. These route reflectors should be strategically placed to ensure efficient routing information dissemination. Clients, also known as non-route reflectors, establish peering sessions with the route reflectors and send their BGP updates to be reflected. Route reflector clusters can also be formed to provide redundancy and load balancing.

Understanding BGP Multipath

BGP multipath, short for Border Gateway Protocol multipath, is a feature that enables the use of multiple paths for traffic forwarding in a network. Traditionally, BGP selects a single best path based on attributes like AS path length, origin type, and MED (Multi-Exit Discriminator) value. However, with BGP multipath, multiple paths can be utilized simultaneously, distributing traffic across multiple links.

Enhanced Network Performance: BGP multipath optimizes network performance by load-balancing traffic using multiple paths. This helps avoid congestion on specific links and ensures efficient utilization of available bandwidth, resulting in faster and more reliable data transmission.

Improved Resilience: BGP multipath enhances network resilience by providing redundancy. In case of link failures or congestion, traffic can be automatically rerouted through alternative paths, minimizing downtime and ensuring continuous connectivity. This dramatically improves the overall reliability of the network infrastructure.

Prefer EBGP over iBGP

Understanding BGP Basics

As a path-vector protocol, BGP differs from other routing protocols in its ability to make routing decisions based on multiple criteria. It establishes connections between autonomous systems (AS) and exchanges routing information to determine the best path for data to follow. By grasping the fundamentals of BGP, we can better comprehend the path selection process.

BGP considers a range of attributes when selecting the most optimal routing path. These attributes include but are not limited to the AS path length, the route’s origin, the next-hop IP address, and various other metrics. Understanding these factors allows network engineers to fine-tune BGP path selection and optimize the data flow.

SDN and BGP

BGP SDN, or Border Gateway Protocol Software-Defined Networking, combines two powerful technologies: the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Software-Defined Networking (SDN). BGP, a routing protocol, facilitates inter-domain routing, while SDN provides centralized control and programmability of the network. Together, they offer a dynamic and adaptable networking environment.

While Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) was initially designed to connect networks operated by different companies, such as transit service providers, providers of large-scale data centers discovered that it could be used for spine and leaf fabrics.

BGP can also be used as an SDN because it already runs on all routers. According to the diagram below, each router in the fabric is connected to an iBGP controller.

Augmented Model

After the iBGP sessions are established, the controller can read the entire topology to determine which path the flow should be pinned to and which flows should avoid the path over which the flow is passing.

An augmented model uses a centralized control plane that interacts directly with a distributed control plane (eBGP). Interestingly, the same protocol used to push policy (the southbound interface) is also used to discover and distribute topology and reachability information in this hybrid model implementation.

The Role of SDN

Before we start our journey on BGP SDN, let us first address what SDN means. The Software-Defined Networking (SDN) framework has a large and varied context. Multiple components, including the OpenFlow protocol, may or may not be used. Some evolving SDN use cases leverage the capabilities of the OpenFlow protocol, while others do not require it.

OpenFlow is only one of those protocols within the SDN architecture. This post addresses using the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) as the transfer protocol between the SDN controller and forwarding devices, enabling BGP-based SDN, also known as BGP SDN.

BGP and OpenFlow

– BGP and OpenFlow are monolithic, meaning they are not used simultaneously. Integrating BGP to SDN offers several use cases, such as DDoS mitigationexception routing, forwarding optimizationsgraceful shutdown, and integration with legacy networks.

– Some of these use cases are available using OpenFlow Traffic Engineering; others, like graceful shutdown and integration with the legacy network, are easier to accomplish with BGP SDN. 

– When BGP and OpenFlow are combined, they create a powerful synergy that enhances network control and performance. BGP provides the foundation for inter-domain routing and connectivity, while OpenFlow facilitates granular traffic engineering within a domain.

– Together, they enable network administrators to fine-tune routing decisions, balance traffic across multiple paths, and enforce quality of service (QoS) policies.

BGP Add Path Feature

The BGP Add Path feature is designed to address the limitations of traditional BGP routing, where only the best path to a destination is advertised. With Add Path, BGP routers can advertise multiple paths to a destination network, providing increased routing options and allowing for more efficient traffic engineering. 

Introducing the Add Path feature brings several benefits to network administrators and service providers. Firstly, it enables better load balancing and traffic distribution across multiple paths, leading to optimized network utilization. Additionally, it enhances network resiliency by providing alternative paths in case of link failures or congestion. 

Before you proceed, you may find the following post helpful:

  1. BGP Explained
  2. Transport SDN
  3. What is OpenFlow
  4. Software Defined Perimeter Solutions
  5. WAN SDN
  6. OpenFlow And SDN Adoption
  7. HP SDN Controller

BGP-Based SDN

What is BGP?

What is the BGP protocol in networking? Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is the routing protocol under the Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) category. In addition, we have separate protocols, which are Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs). However, IGP can have some disadvantages.

Firstly, policies are challenging to implement with an IGP because of the need for more flexibility. Usually, a tag is the only tool available that can be problematic to manage and execute on a large-scale basis. In the age of increasingly complex networks in both architecture and services, BGP presents a comprehensive suite of knobs to deal with complex policies, such as the following:

• Communities

• AS_PATH filters

• Local preference

• Multiple exit discriminator (MED

Highlighting BGP-based SDN 

BGP-based SDN involves two main solution components that may be integrated into several existing BGP technologies. First, we have an SDN controller component that speaks BGP and decides what needs to be done. Second, we have a BGP originator component that sends BGP updates to the SDN controller and other BGP peers. For example, the controller could be a BGP software package running on Open Daylight. BGP originators are Linux daemons or traditional proprietary vendor devices running the BGP stack.

What does SDN mean
Diagram: What does SDN mean with BGP SDN?

Creating an SDN architecture

To create the SDN architecture, these components are integrated with existing BGP technologies, such as BGP FlowSpec (RFC 5575), L3VPN (RFC4364), EVPN (RFC 7432), and BGP-LS. BGP FlowSpec distributes forwarding entries, such as ACL and PBR, to devices’ TCAMs. L3VPN and EVPN offer the mechanism to integrate with legacy networks and service insertion. BGP-LS extracts IGP network topology information and passes it to the SDN controller via BGP updates.

**Central policy, visibility, and control**

Introducing BGP into the SDN framework does not mean a centralized control plane. We still have a central policy, visibility, and control, but this is not a centralized control plane. A centralized control plane would involve local control plane protocols establishing adjacencies or other ties to the controller. In this case, the forwarding devices outright require the controller to forward packets; forwarding functionality is limited when the controller is down.

If the BGP SDN controller acts as a BGP route reflector, all announcements go to the controller, but the network runs fine without it. The controller is just adding value to the usual forwarding process. BGP-based SDN architecture augments the network; it does not replace it.

Decentralizing the control plane is the only way; look at Big Switch and NEC’s SDN design changes over the last few years. Centralized control planes cannot scale.

Why use BGP?

BGP is well-understood and field-tested. It has been extended on many occasions to carry additional types of information, such as MAC addresses and labels. Technically, BGP can be used as a replacement for Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) in an MPLS core. Labels can be assigned to IPv6 prefixes (6PE) and labeled switched across an IPv4-only MPLS core.

BGP is very extensible. It started with IPv4 forwarding, and address families were added for multicast and VPN traffic. Using multiple addresses inside a single BGP process was widely accepted and implemented as a core technology. The entire Internet is made up of BGP, and it carries over 500,000 prefixes. It’s very scalable and robust. Some MPLS service providers are carrying over 1 million customer routes.

The use of open-source BGP daemons

There are many high-quality open-source BGP daemons available. Quagga is one of the most popular, and its quality has improved since it adopted Cumulus and Google. Quagga is a routing suite that provides IGP support for IS-IS and OSPF. Also, a BIRD daemon is available. The implementation is based around Internet exchange points as the route server element. BIRD is currently carrying over 100,000 prefixes.

Using BGP-based SDN on an SDN controller integrates easily with your existing network. You don’t have to replace any existing equipment, deploy the controller, and implement the add-on functionality that BGP SDN offers. It enables a preferred step-by-step migration approach, not a risky big bang OpenFlow deployment.

IGP to the controller?

Why not run OSPF or ISIS to the controller? IS-IS is extendable with TLVs and, too, can carry a variety of information. The real problem is not extensibility but the lack of trust and policy control. IGP extension to the SDN controller with few controls could present a problem. OSPF sends LSA packets; there is no input filter. BGP is designed with policy control in mind and acts as a filter by implementing controls on individual BGP sessions.

BGP offers control on the network side and predicts what the controller can do. For example, the blast radius is restricted if the controller encounters a bug or is compromised. BGP also provides excellent policy mechanisms between the SDN controller and physical infrastructure. 

Introducing BGP-LS

SDN requires complete topology visibility. The picture is incomplete if some topology information is hidden in IGP and other NLRIs in BGP. If you have an existing IGP, how do you propagate this information to the BGP controller? Border Gateway Protocol Link-State (BGP-LS) is cleaner than establishing an IGP peering relationship with the SDN controller. 

BGP-LS extracts network topology information and updates it to the BGP controller. Once again, BGPv4 is extended to provide the capability to include the new Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) encoding format. It sends information from IS-IS or OSPF topology database through BGP updates to the SDN controller. BGP-LS can configure the session to be unidirectional and stop incoming updates to enhance security between the physical and SDN worlds.

A key point: SDN controller cannot leak information back

As a result, the SDN controller cannot leak information back into the running network. BGP-LS is a relatively new concept. It focuses on the mechanism to export IGP information and does not describe how the SDN controller can use it. Once the controller has the complete topology information, it may be integrated with traffic engineers and external path computing solutions to interact with information usually only carried by an IGP database.

For example, the Traffic Engineering Database (TED), built by ISIS and OSPF-TE extensions, is typically distributed by IGPs within the network. Previously, each node maintained its own TED, but now, this can be exported to a BGP RR SDN application for better visibility.

BGP scale-out architectures

SDN controller will always become the scalability bottleneck. It can scale better when it’s not participating in data plane activity, but eventually, it will reach its limits. Every controller implementation eventually hits this point. The only way to grow is to scale out. 

Reachability and policy information is synchronized between individual controllers. For example, reachability information can be transferred and synchronized with MP-BGP, L3VPN for IP routing, or EVPN for layer-2 forwarding.

BGP SDN

Utilizing BGP between controllers offers additional benefits. Each controller can be placed in a separate availability zone, and tight BGP policy controls are implemented on BGP sessions connecting those domains, offering a clean failure domain separation.

An error in one available zone is not propagated to the next available zone. BGP is a very scalable protocol, and the failure domains can be as large as you want, but the more significant the domain, the longer the convergence times. Adjust the size of failure domains to meet scalability and convergence requirements. 

BGP SDN combines the power of BGP routing and SDN to create a networking paradigm that enhances flexibility, scalability, and manageability. By leveraging BGP SDN, organizations can build dynamic networks that adapt to their changing needs and optimize resource utilization. As the demand for faster, more reliable, and flexible networks continues to grow, BGP SDN is poised to play a critical role in shaping the future of network infrastructure.

Summary: BGP-Based SDN

In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, software-defined networking (SDN) has emerged as a groundbreaking approach to network management. One of the key components within the realm of SDN is the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). In this blog post, we delved into the world of BGP SDN, exploring its significance, functionality, and how it transforms traditional networking architectures.

Understanding BGP

BGP, or Border Gateway Protocol, is a routing protocol that facilitates the exchange of routing information between different autonomous systems (AS). It plays a crucial role in determining the optimal path for data packets to traverse across the internet. Unlike other routing protocols, BGP operates on a policy-based routing model, allowing network administrators to have granular control over traffic flow and network policies.

The Evolution of SDN

To comprehend the importance of BGP SDN, it is essential to understand the evolution of software-defined networking. SDN revolutionizes traditional network architectures by decoupling the control plane from the underlying physical infrastructure. This separation enables centralized network control, programmability, and dynamic configuration, enhancing flexibility and scalability.

BGP in the SDN Paradigm

Within the SDN framework, BGP plays a pivotal role in interconnecting different SDN domains, providing a scalable and flexible solution for routing between virtual networks. By incorporating BGP into the SDN architecture, organizations can achieve dynamic network provisioning, traffic engineering, and efficient handling of network policy changes.

Benefits of BGP SDN

The integration of BGP within the SDN paradigm brings forth numerous benefits. Firstly, it enables seamless interoperability between SDN and traditional networking environments, ensuring a smooth transition towards software-defined infrastructures. Additionally, BGP SDN empowers network administrators with enhanced control and visibility, simplifying the management of complex network topologies and policies.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, BGP SDN represents a significant milestone in the networking industry. Its ability to merge the power of BGP with the flexibility of software-defined networking opens new horizons for network management. By embracing BGP SDN, organizations can achieve greater agility, scalability, and control over their networks, ultimately leading to more efficient and adaptable infrastructures.

network traffic engineering

Network Traffic Engineering

Network Traffic Engineering

In today's interconnected world, network traffic engineering plays a crucial role in optimizing the performance and efficiency of computer networks. This blog post aims to provide a comprehensive overview of network traffic engineering, its importance, and the techniques used to manage and control traffic flow.

Network traffic engineering efficiently manages and controls the flow of data packets within a computer network. It involves analyzing network traffic patterns, predicting future demands, and implementing strategies to ensure smooth data transmission.

Bandwidth allocation is a critical aspect of traffic engineering. By prioritizing certain types of data traffic, such as VoIP or video streaming, network engineers can ensure optimal performance for essential applications. Quality of Service (QoS) mechanisms, such as traffic shaping and prioritization, allow for efficient bandwidth allocation, reducing latency and packet loss.

Load balancing distributes network traffic across multiple paths or devices, optimizing resource utilization and preventing congestion. Network traffic engineering employs load balancing techniques, such as Equal-Cost Multipath (ECMP) routing and Dynamic Multipath Optimization (DMPO), to distribute traffic intelligently. This section will discuss load balancing algorithms and their role in traffic optimization.

QoS plays a crucial role in network traffic engineering by prioritizing certain types of traffic over others. Through QoS mechanisms such as traffic shaping, prioritization, and bandwidth allocation, critical applications can receive the necessary resources while preventing congestion from affecting overall network performance.

Routing protocols like OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) and BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) play a vital role in traffic engineering. By selecting optimal paths based on metrics like bandwidth, delay, and cost, these protocols adapt to changing network conditions and direct traffic along the most efficient routes.

Network traffic engineering is an indispensable discipline for managing the complexities of modern networks. By implementing effective traffic monitoring, QoS mechanisms, load balancing, and routing protocols, organizations can optimize network performance, improve user experience, and ensure seamless connectivity in the face of evolving traffic patterns and demands.

Highlights: Network Traffic Engineering

Understanding Network Traffic Engineering:

Network traffic engineering involves the analysis, modeling, and control of network traffic to maximize efficiency and reliability. It encompasses various aspects such as traffic measurement, traffic prediction, routing protocols, and quality of service (QoS) management. By carefully managing network resources, traffic engineering aims to minimize delays, maximize throughput, and ensure seamless communication.

  • Congestion Management Techniques

Congestion is a common occurrence in networks, leading to degraded performance and delays. Various techniques are employed in network traffic engineering to manage congestion effectively. These include traffic shaping, where data flows are regulated to prevent sudden surges, and prioritization of traffic based on quality of service (QoS) requirements. Additionally, load balancing techniques distribute traffic across multiple paths to prevent bottlenecks and ensure optimal resource utilization.

  • Route Optimization Strategies

Efficient route selection is a critical aspect of network traffic engineering. By utilizing routing protocols and algorithms, engineers can determine the most optimal paths for data transmission. This involves considering factors such as network latency, available bandwidth, and the overall health of network links. Dynamic routing protocols, such as OSPF and BGP, continuously adapt to changes in network conditions, ensuring that traffic is routed through the most efficient paths.

  • Traffic Engineering in the Era of SDN

Software-defined networking (SDN) has revolutionized network traffic engineering by introducing programmability and centralized control. With SDN, network engineers can dynamically configure and manage traffic flows, allowing for more agile and responsive networks. By leveraging technologies like OpenFlow, SDN enables granular traffic engineering capabilities, empowering network administrators to efficiently allocate network resources and adapt to changing demands.

Key Traffic Engineering Points

-Traffic Measurement and Analysis: Accurate measurement and analysis of network traffic patterns are fundamental to effective traffic engineering. By capturing and analyzing traffic data, network administrators gain insights into usage patterns, peak hours, and potential bottlenecks. This information helps in making informed decisions regarding network optimization and resource allocation.

-Traffic Prediction and Forecasting: Network operators must anticipate future traffic patterns. Through statistical analysis and predictive modeling, traffic engineers can forecast demand and plan network upgrades accordingly. By staying ahead of the curve, they ensure that network capacity keeps up with increasing data demands.

-Routing Optimization: Efficient routing is at the core of network traffic engineering. Through intelligent routing protocols and algorithms, traffic engineers optimize the flow of data across networks. They consider factors such as link utilization, latency, and available bandwidth to determine the most optimal paths for data transmission. This helps minimize congestion and ensure reliable communication.

-Prioritization and Resource Allocation: Network traffic engineering involves prioritizing different types of traffic based on their importance. Critical services such as voice and video can be prioritized by allocating resources accordingly, ensuring smooth and uninterrupted transmission. QoS mechanisms like traffic shaping, traffic policing, and packet scheduling help achieve this.

-Load Balancing: Load balancing is another crucial aspect of QoS management. By distributing traffic across multiple paths, network engineers prevent individual links from becoming overloaded. This improves overall network performance and enhances reliability and fault tolerance.

google cloud routes

Traffic Engineering: Cloud Data Centers

Understanding VPC Networking

Before we dive into the specifics of VPC networking in Google Cloud, let’s establish a foundation of understanding. A Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) is a virtual network dedicated to a specific Google Cloud project. It provides an isolated and secure environment where resources can be created, managed, and interconnected. Within a VPC, you can define subnets, set up IP ranges, and configure firewall rules to control traffic flow.

Google Cloud’s VPC networking offers a range of powerful features that enhance network management and security. One notable feature is the ability to create and manage multiple VPCs, allowing for logical separation of resources based on different requirements. Additionally, VPC peering enables communication between VPCs, even across different projects or regions. This flexibility empowers organizations to build scalable and complex network architectures.

VPC Peerings

Understanding VPC Peerings

VPC Peerings, or Virtual Private Cloud Peerings, are a mechanism that allows different Virtual Private Cloud networks to communicate with each other securely. This enables seamless connectivity between disparate networks, facilitating efficient data transfer and resource sharing. In Google Cloud, VPC Peerings play a pivotal role in creating robust and scalable network architectures.

VPC Peerings offer a multitude of benefits for organizations leveraging Google Cloud. Firstly, they eliminate the need for complex VPN setups or costly physical connections, as VPC Peerings enable direct network communication. Secondly, VPC Peerings provide a secure and private channel for data transfer, ensuring confidentiality and integrity. Additionally, they enable organizations to expand their network reach and collaborate effortlessly across various projects or regions.

Google Load Balancers

Load balancers are essential components in distributed systems that evenly distribute incoming network traffic across multiple servers or instances. This distribution ensures that no single server is overwhelmed, resulting in improved response times and reliability. Google Cloud offers two types of load balancers: network and HTTP load balancers.

Network Load Balancers: Network load balancers operate at Layer 4 of the OSI model, meaning they distribute traffic based on IP addresses and ports. They are ideal for protocols such as TCP and UDP, providing low-latency and high-throughput load balancing. Setting up a network load balancer in Google Cloud involves creating an instance group, configuring health checks, and defining forwarding rules.

HTTP Load Balancers: HTTP load balancers, on the other hand, operate at Layer 7 and can intelligently distribute traffic based on HTTP/HTTPS requests. This allows for advanced features like session affinity, content-based routing, and SSL offloading. Configuring an HTTP load balancer with Google Cloud involves creating a backend service, defining a backend bucket or instance group, and configuring URL maps and target proxies.

Cross Regions Load Balancing

### Understanding Cross-Region Load Balancing

Cross-region load balancing is designed to distribute traffic across multiple data centers located in different geographical regions. This strategy maximizes resource utilization, minimizes latency, and provides seamless failover capabilities. By deploying applications across various regions, businesses can ensure that their services remain available, even in the event of a regional outage. Google Cloud offers robust cross-region HTTP load balancing solutions that allow businesses to deliver high availability and reliability for their users worldwide.

### Features of Google Cloud Load Balancing

Google Cloud’s load balancing services come packed with features that make it a top choice for businesses. These include global load balancing with a single IP address, SSL offloading for better security and performance, and intelligent routing based on proximity and performance metrics. Google Cloud also provides real-time monitoring and logging, enabling businesses to gain insights into traffic patterns and optimize their infrastructure accordingly. These features collectively enhance the performance and reliability of web applications, ensuring a seamless user experience.

### Setting Up Cross-Region Load Balancing on Google Cloud

Implementing cross-region load balancing on Google Cloud is straightforward, thanks to its user-friendly interface and comprehensive documentation. Businesses can start by defining their backend services and specifying the regions they want to include in their load balancing setup. Google Cloud then automatically manages the distribution of traffic, ensuring optimal performance and resource utilization. Additionally, businesses can customize their load balancing rules to accommodate specific requirements, such as session affinity or custom failover strategies.

cross region load balancing

Network Policies & Kubernetes

The Anatomy of a Network Policy

A GKE Network Policy is essentially a set of rules defined by Kubernetes that dictate what type of traffic is allowed to or from your pods. These policies are defined in YAML files and can specify traffic restrictions based on IP blocks, ports, and pod labels. Understanding the structure of these policies is fundamental to leveraging their full potential. By focusing on selectors and rules, you can create policies that are both specific and flexible, allowing for precise control over network traffic.

### Implementing Traffic Engineering with Network Policies

Network traffic engineering with GKE Network Policies involves designing your network flow to optimize performance and security. By using these policies, you can segment your network traffic, ensuring that sensitive data is only accessible to authorized pods. This segmentation can help minimize the risk of data breaches and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. Additionally, you can use network policies to manage traffic load, ensuring that critical services receive the bandwidth they require.

### Best Practices for Using GKE Network Policies

When implementing GKE Network Policies, it’s important to follow best practices to ensure efficiency and security:

1. **Start with a Default Deny Policy:** Begin by denying all traffic and then gradually open up only the necessary paths. This minimizes the risk of unintentional exposure.

2. **Use Pod Labels Effectively:** Ensure your pod labels are well-organized and meaningful, as these are critical for creating effective network policies.

3. **Regularly Review and Update Policies:** As your applications evolve, so should your network policies. Regular audits and updates will ensure they continue to meet your security and performance needs.

Kubernetes network policy

On-Premises Traffic Engineering

Recap Technology: Router on a Stick

A router on a stick is a networking method that allows for the virtual segmentation of a physical network into multiple virtual local area networks (VLANs). By utilizing a single physical interface on a router, multiple VLANs can be connected and routed between each other, enabling efficient traffic flow within a network.

Several critical components must be in place to implement a router on a stick. Firstly, a router capable of supporting VLANs and subinterfaces is required. Additionally, a managed switch that supports VLAN tagging is necessary. The logical separation of networks is achieved by configuring the router with subinterfaces and assigning specific VLANs to each. The managed switch, on the other hand, facilitates the tagging of VLANs on the physical ports connected to the router.

router on a stick

What is Policy-Based Routing?

Policy-based routing (PBR) allows network administrators to route traffic based on predefined policies or criteria selectively. Unlike traditional routing methods relying solely on destination IP addresses, PBR considers additional factors such as source IP addresses, protocols, and packet attributes. Thus, PBR offers greater flexibility and control over network traffic flow.

To implement policy-based routing, several steps need to be followed. Firstly, administrators must define the policies that will govern traffic routing decisions. These policies can be based on various parameters, including source or destination IP addresses, transport layer protocols, or packet attributes such as DSCP markings.

Once the policies are defined, they must be associated with specific routing actions, such as forwarding traffic to a particular next-hop or routing table. Finally, the policy-based routing configuration must be applied to relevant network devices, ensuring the desired traffic behavior.

Generic Traffic Engineering

Network traffic engineering involves optimizing and managing traffic flows to enhance overall performance. It encompasses various techniques and strategies for controlling and shaping the flow of data packets, minimizing congestion, and maximizing network efficiency.

Network traffic engineering involves analyzing, monitoring, and controlling traffic to achieve desired performance. It aims to maximize efficiency, minimize congestion, and optimize resource utilization. Network traffic engineering ensures seamless communication and reliable connectivity by intelligently managing data flows.

a) Traffic Analysis: This technique involves studying traffic patterns, identifying bottlenecks, and analyzing network behavior. By understanding the data flow dynamics, network engineers can make informed decisions to enhance performance and mitigate congestion.

b) Quality of Service (QoS): QoS mechanisms prioritize different types of traffic based on predefined criteria. This ensures critical applications receive sufficient bandwidth and low-latency connections while less important traffic is appropriately managed.

c) Load Balancing: Load balancing distributes network traffic across multiple paths or devices, preventing resource overutilization and congestion. It optimizes available capacity, ensuring efficient data transmission and minimizing delays.

Example: Multipoint GRE

When establishing secure communication tunnels over IP networks, GRE (Generic Routing Encapsulation) protocols play a crucial role. Among the variations of GRE, two commonly used types are multipoint GRE and point-to-point GRE. 

As the name suggests, point-to-point GRE provides a direct and dedicated connection between two endpoints. It allows for secure and private communication between these points, encapsulating the original IP packets within GRE headers. This type of GRE is typically employed when a direct, point-to-point link is desired, such as connecting two remote offices or establishing VPN connections.

Unlike point-to-point GRE, multipoint GRE enables communication between multiple endpoints within a network. It acts as a hub, allowing various sites or hosts to connect and exchange data securely. Multipoint GRE simplifies network design by eliminating the need for individual point-to-point connections. It is an efficient and scalable solution for scenarios like hub-and-spoke networks or multicast applications.

Example: Understanding NHRP

NHRP, at its core, is a protocol used to discover the next hop for reaching a particular destination within a VPN. It acts as a mediator between the client and the server, enabling seamless communication by resolving IP addresses to the appropriate physical addresses. By doing so, NHRP eliminates the need for unnecessary broadcasts and optimizes routing efficiency.

To comprehend NHRP’s operation, let’s break it down into three key steps: registration, resolution, and caching. A client registers its tunnel IP address with the NHRP server during registration. In the resolution phase, the client queries the NHRP server to obtain the physical address of the desired destination. Finally, the caching mechanism allows subsequent requests to be resolved locally, reducing network overhead.


IPv6 Traffic Engineering

Understanding Router Advertisement (RA)

RA is a critical component in IPv6 network configuration, allowing routers to inform hosts about their presence and available services. By sending periodic RAs, routers enable hosts to autoconfigure their IPv6 addresses and determine the default gateway for outgoing traffic.

Router Advertisement Preference refers to the mechanism by which hosts select the most suitable router among the multiple routers available in a network. This preference level is determined by various factors, including the router’s Lifetime, Router Priority, and Prefix Information Options.

Factors Influencing Router Advertisement Preference:

a) Router Lifetime: The Lifetime value indicates the validity duration of the advertised prefixes. Hosts prioritize routers with longer Lifetime values, as they provide stable connectivity.

b) Router Priority: Hosts prefer routers with higher priority values during RA selection. This allows for more granular control over which routers are chosen as default gateways.

c) Prefix Information Options: Specific Prefix Information Options, such as Autonomous Flag and On-Link Flag, influence the router preference. Hosts evaluate these options to determine the router’s capability for autonomous address configuration and on-link subnet connectivity.

Traffic Engineering with Routing protocols

Routing protocol traffic engineering is the art of intelligently managing network traffic flow. It involves the manipulation of routing paths to achieve specific objectives, such as minimizing latency, maximizing bandwidth utilization, or enhancing network resilience. By strategically steering traffic, network administrators can overcome congestion, bottlenecks, and other performance limitations.

Traffic Engineering with OSPF: OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) is a widely used routing protocol that supports traffic engineering capabilities. It allows network administrators to influence traffic paths by manipulating link metrics, enabling the establishment of preferred routes and load balancing across multiple links.

MPLS Traffic Engineering: Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is another powerful tool in traffic engineering. By assigning labels to network packets, MPLS enables the creation of explicit paths that bypass congested links or traverse paths with specific quality of service (QoS) requirements. MPLS traffic engineering provides granular control and flexibility in routing decisions.

BGP Traffic Engineering: Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is primarily used in large-scale networks and internet service provider (ISP) environments. BGP traffic engineering allows network operators to manipulate BGP attributes to influence route selection and steer traffic based on various criteria, such as AS path length, local preference, or community values.

Traffic Engineering with EIGRP

Before diving into EFRR, let’s briefly overview the Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP). Developed by Cisco, EIGRP is a routing protocol widely used in enterprise networks. It provides fast convergence, load balancing, and scalability, making it a popular choice among network administrators.

Fast Reroute (FRR) is a mechanism that enables routers to swiftly reroute traffic in the event of a link or node failure. Within the realm of EIGRP, EFRR refers to the specific implementation of FRR. EFRR allows for sub-second convergence by precomputing backup paths, significantly reducing the impact of network failures.

EIGRP LFAExample: BGP Traffic Engineering with DMVPM

DMVPN Phase 2 Traffic Engineering

Resolutions triggered by the NHRP

Learning the mapping information required through NHRP resolution creates a dynamic spoke-to-spoke tunnel. How does a spoke know how to perform such a task? As an enhancement to DMVPN Phase 1, spoke-to-spoke tunnels were first introduced in Phase 2 of the network. Phase 2 handed responsibility for NHRP resolution requests to each spoke individually, which means that spokes initiated NHRP resolution requests when they determined a packet needed a spoke-to-spoke tunnel. Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF) would assist the spoke in making this decision based on information contained in its routing table.

Network Traffic Engineering Tools

Network Monitoring and Analysis: Network monitoring tools, like packet sniffers and flow analyzers, provide valuable insights into traffic patterns, bandwidth utilization, and performance metrics. These tools help network engineers identify bottlenecks, analyze traffic behavior, and make informed decisions for traffic optimization.

a) Traffic Analysis Tools

Traffic analysis tools provide valuable insights into network traffic patterns, helping administrators identify potential bottlenecks, anomalies, and security threats. These tools often use packet sniffing and flow analysis techniques to capture and analyze network traffic data.

b) Traffic Optimization Tools

Traffic optimization tools focus on improving network performance by optimizing network resources, reducing congestion, and balancing traffic loads. These tools use algorithms and heuristics to intelligently route traffic, allocate bandwidth, and manage Quality of Service (QoS) parameters.

c) Traffic Monitoring and Reporting Tools

Monitoring and reporting tools are essential for network administrators to gain real-time visibility into network traffic. These tools provide comprehensive dashboards, visualizations, and reports that help identify network usage patterns, track performance metrics, and troubleshoot issues promptly.

d) Traffic Simulation and Modeling Tools

Traffic simulation and modeling tools enable network engineers to assess the impact of changes in network configurations before implementation. By simulating various scenarios and traffic patterns, these tools help optimize network designs, plan capacity upgrades, and evaluate the effectiveness of traffic engineering strategies.

Network Flow Model

In a computer network, an important function is to carry traffic efficiently, given the routing paradigm in place. Traffic engineering achieves this efficiency. Network flow models are used for network traffic engineering and can help determine routing decisions. Network Traffic engineering (TE) is the engineering of paths that can carry traffic flows that vary from those chosen automatically by the routing protocol(s) used in that network.

Therefore, we can engineer the paths that better suit our application. We can do this in several ways, such as standard IP routing, MPLS, or OpenFlow protocol. When considering network traffic engineering and MPLS OpenFlow, let’s start with the basics of traffic engineering and MPLS networking.

**Traffic Engineering Examples**

Traffic engineering is not an MPLS-specific practice; it is a general practice. Implementing traffic engineering can be as simple as tweaking IP metrics on interfaces or as complex as running an ATM PVC full-mesh and optimizing PVC paths based on traffic demands. Using MPLS, traffic engineering techniques (like ATM PVC placement) are merged with IP routing techniques to achieve connection-oriented traffic engineering. With MPLS, traffic engineering is just as practical as with ATM, but without some drawbacks of IP over ATM.

**Decoupling Routing and Forwarding**

A hop-by-hop forwarding paradigm is used in IP routing. When an IP packet arrives at a router, it is checked for the destination address in the IP header, a route lookup is performed, and the packet is forwarded to the next hop. The packet is dropped if there is no route. Each hop repeats this process until the packet reaches its destination.

Nodes in MPLS networks also forward packets hop by hop, but this forwarding is based on fixed-length labels. MPLS applications such as traffic engineering are enabled by this ability to decouple packet forwarding from IP headers.

Understanding MPLS Forwarding

MPLS, or Multi-Protocol Label Switching, is used in telecommunications networks to efficiently direct data packets based on labels rather than traditional IP routing. This section will provide a clear and concise overview of MPLS forwarding, explaining its purpose, components, and how it differs from conventional routing methods.

Implementing MPLS forwarding requires careful planning and configuration. This section will provide step-by-step guidance on deploying MPLS forwarding in a network infrastructure. From designing the MPLS network architecture to configuring routers and establishing Label Switched Paths (LSPs), readers will receive practical insights and best practices for a successful implementation.

Example Technology: Next-Hop Resolution Protocol

1: NHRP, or Next Hop Resolution Protocol, is vital in dynamic address resolution. It enables efficient communication between devices in a network by mapping logical IP addresses to physical addresses. By doing so, NHRP bridges the gap between network layers, ensuring seamless connectivity.

2: The operation of NHRP involves various components working in tandem. These components include the Next Hop Server (NHS), Next Hop Client (NHC), and Next Hop Forwarder (NHF). Each element performs specific tasks, such as address resolution, maintaining mappings, and forwarding packets. Understanding the roles of these components is critical to comprehending NHRP’s functionality.

3: Implementing NHRP offers numerous benefits in networking environments. First, it enhances network scalability, allowing devices to discover and connect dynamically. Second, NHRP improves network performance by reducing the burden on routers and enabling direct communication between devices. Third, it enhances network security by providing a secure mechanism for address resolution.

4: NHRP is used in various scenarios. One everyday use case is Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), where NHRP enables efficient communication between remote sites. It is also employed in dynamic multipoint virtual private networks (DMVPNs) to establish direct tunnels between multiple sites dynamically. These use cases highlight the versatility and significance of NHRP in modern networking.

MPLS and Traffic Engineering

The applications MPLS enables will motivate you to deploy it in your network. Traditional IP networks are either incapable of supporting these applications or are challenging to implement. Traffic engineering and MPLS VPNs are examples of such applications. This book is about the latter. In the sections below, we will discuss MPLS’s main benefits:

  • Routing and forwarding can be decoupled.
  • IP and ATM integration should be improved.
  • Providing the basis for building next-generation network applications and services, such as MPLS VPNs and traffic engineering

MPLS TE combines IP class-of-service differentiation and ATM traffic engineering capabilities. A Label-Switched Path (LSP) enables the construction of a network and traffic forwarding down it.

As with ATM VCs, an MPLS TE LSP (a TE tunnel) enables the headend to control the path traffic takes to a particular destination. This method allows traffic to be forwarded based on various criteria rather than just the destination address.

Due to MPLS TE’s inherent nature, ATM VCs and other overlay models do not suffer from flooding problems like MPLS TE. To construct a routing table with MPLS TE LSPs without forming a full mesh of routing neighbors, MPLS TE uses an autoroute mechanism (unrelated to the WAN switching circuit-routing protocol of the same name).

In the same way ATM reserves bandwidth for LSPs, MPLS TE does the same when it builds LSPs. If you reserve bandwidth for an LSP, your network becomes a consumable resource. As new LSPs are added, TE-LSPs can find paths across the network with bandwidth available to reserve.

MPLS TE

Performance-Based Routing

Understanding Performance Routing

Performance Routing, or PfR, is an intelligent routing mechanism that optimizes network traffic based on real-time conditions. Unlike traditional routing protocols, PfR goes beyond static routing tables and dynamically selects the best path for data packets to reach their destination. This dynamic decision-making is based on congestion, latency, and link quality, ensuring an optimal end-user experience

PfR operates by continuously monitoring network performance metrics such as delay, jitter, and packet loss. It collects this data from various sources, including network probes and flow-based measurements. Using this information, PfR dynamically calculates the best path for each data flow, considering factors like available bandwidth and desired Quality of Service (QoS). This intelligent decision-making process happens in real time, adapting to changing network conditions.

Related: You may find the following posts helpful for pre-information:

  1. Transport SDN
  2. Network Visibility
  3. Load Balancing
  4. Chaos Engineering Kubernetes
  5. Segment Routing
  6. What is OpenFlow
  7. DMVPN Phases

Network Traffic Engineering

Importance of Network Traffic Engineering

Guide: MPLS Forwarding

In the following guide, we have an MPLS network. MPLS networks have devices with different roles. So, we have the core node called the “P” provider and the “PE” provider edge nodes. The beauty of MPLS forwarding is that we can have scale in the network’s core. The P nodes do not need customer routes from the CE devices. These are usually carried out in BGP.

Note:

However, with an MPLS network, we have MPLS forwarding between the loopbacks. Notice the diagram below. The loopback addresses 2.2.2.2/32 and 4.4.4.4/32 belong to the PE nodes. The P node is entirely unaware of any BGP routing.

MPLS overlay
Diagram: MPLS Overlay

Knowledge Check: IntServ and RSVP

Quality of Service (QoS) can be measured in three ways:

  • Best Effort (don’t use QoS for traffic that doesn’t need special treatment.)

  • DiffServ (Differentiated Services)

  • IntServ (Integrated Services)

DiffServ implements QoS by classifying IP packets based on their ToS byte or hop by hop. INTSERV is entirely different; it’s a signaling process where network flows can request a specific bandwidth and delay. RFC 1633 describes two components of IntServ:

  • Resource reservation

  • Admission control

Reserved resources notify the network that a certain amount of bandwidth and delay is needed for a particular flow. When the reservation is successful, a network component (primarily routers) reserves bandwidth and delay. Reservations are permitted or denied by admission control. We cannot guarantee any service without allowing all flows to make reservations.

RSVP path messages are used when a host requests a reservation. This message is passed along the route on the way to the destination. A router will forward a message when it can guarantee the bandwidth/delay required.

An RSVP resv message will be sent once it reaches the destination. In the opposite direction, the same process will occur. Upon receiving the reservation message from the host, each router will check if it has enough bandwidth/delay for the flow and forward it to the source of the reservation.

While this might sound nice, IntServ is challenging to scale…each router must keep track of each reservation for each flow. Is there a problem if a particular router does not support Intserv or its reservation information is lost? We primarily use RSVP for MPLS traffic engineering and DiffServ for QoS implementations.

Traffic Engineering: Inbound and Outbound

Before you can understand how to use MPLS to do traffic engineering, you must understand what traffic engineering is. So, we have network engineering that manipulates your network to suit your traffic. You make the most reasonable predictions about how traffic will flow across your network and then order the right components.

Then we have traffic engineering. Network traffic engineering is manipulating traffic to fit your network. Traffic engineering is not MPLS-specific but a general practice among all networking and security technologies. It could be a simple or complex implementation. Something as simple as tweaking IP metrics on the interface can be implemented in its simplest form for traffic engineering. Then, we have traffic engineering specific to MPLS.

Network traffic engineering
Diagram: Network Traffic Engineering. Source AWS

Guide: MPLS TE

In this lab, we will examine MPLS TE with ISIS configuration. Our MPLS core network consists of PE1, P1, P2, P3, and PE2 routers. The CE1 and CE2 routers use regular IP routing. All routers are configured to use IS-IS L2. 

Tip: There are four main items we have to configure:

  • Enable MPLS TE support:
    • Globally
    • Interfaces
  • Configure IS-IS to support MPLS TE.
  • Configure RSVP.
  • Configure a tunnel interface.
MPLS TE
Diagram: MPLS TE

Understanding MPLS and MPLS forwarding

– MPLS is the de facto technology for service provider WAN networks. Its scalable architecture moves complexity and decision-making to the network’s edges, leaving the core to label switch packets efficiently. The PE nodes sit at the edge and perform path calculations and encapsulations. The P nodes sit in the core and label switch packets. They only perform MPLS switching and have no visibility of customer routes.

– Edge MPLS routers map incoming packets into forwarding equivalence classes (FEC) and use a different label-switched path (LSP) for each forwarding class. Keeping the network core simple enables scalable network designs. Many of today’s control planes encompass a distributed architecture and can make forwarding decisions independently.

– MPLS control plane still needs a distributed IGP (OSPF and ISIS) to run in the core and a distributed label allocation protocol (LDP) to label packets. Still, it shifted how we think of control planes and distributed architectures. MPLS reduced the challenges of some early control plane approaches but proposes challenges by not having central visibility, especially for traffic engineering (TE).

MPLS forwarding
Diagram: MPLS Forwarding. The source is NetworkInterview.

Example Technology: DMVPN Phase 3 Traffic Manipulation

DMVPN Phase 3 is the third and final phase of a Dynamic Multipoint Virtual Private Network DMVPN setup. This phase is focused on implementing the DMVPN tunnel and enabling dynamic routing. The tunnel is built between multiple network points, allowing communication between them.

In DMVPN Phase 1, the spoke devices rely on the configured tunnel destination to identify where to send the encapsulated packets. Phase 3 DMVPN uses mGRE tunnels and depends on NHRP redirect and resolution request messages to determine the NBMA addresses for destination networks.

Packets flow through the hub in a traditional hub-and-spoke manner until the spoke-to-spoke tunnel has been established in both directions. Then, as packets flow across the hub, the hub engages NHRP redirection to find a more optimal path with spoke-to-spoke tunnels.

NHRP Routing Table Manipulation

NHRP tightly interacts with the routing/forwarding tables and installs or modifies routes in the Routing Information Base (RIB), also known as the routing table, as necessary. If an entry exists with an exact match for the network and prefix length, NHRP overrides the existing next hop with a shortcut. The original protocol is still responsible for the prefix, but the percent sign (%) indicates overwritten next-hop addresses in the routing table.

DMVPN Phase 3
Diagram: DMVPN Phase 3 configuration

Guide: DMVPN Phase 3

The following example shows DMVPN Phase 3 running on the network.

DMVPN Phase 3 is the latest iteration of the DMVPN technology, offering enhanced scalability and flexibility compared to its predecessors. It builds upon the foundation of Phase 1 and Phase 2, incorporating improvements that address the limitations of these earlier versions.

One of the critical features of DMVPN Phase 3 is the addition of a hub-and-spoke network topology. This allows for a centralized hub connecting multiple remote spokes, creating a dynamic and efficient network infrastructure. The hub is a central point for all spokes, enabling secure communication. In our case below, R11 is the hub, and R31 and R41 are the spokes.

Note:

Once the hub site receives traffic indicating spoke to spoke traffic, it sends back a “Traffic Indication” message. Notice the output from the debug command below. Via NHRP, the spoke knows a better path to reach the other spoke, not via the hub. The spoke then proceeds to build spoke-to-spoke tunnels.

DMVPN Phase 3
Diagram: DMVPN Phase 3 configuration

Network Traffic Engineering and MPLS 

MPLS was very successful, and significant service provider networks could support many customers by employing MPLS-style architecture. End-to-end Label Switch Paths (LSP) are extended to interconnect multiple MPLS service providers, route reflectors, and BGP confederations for large-scale deployments and complexity reduction.

However, no matter how scalable the MPLS architecture could be, you can’t escape the fact that Inter-DC circuit upgrades are time-consuming and expensive. To help alleviate this, MPLS providers introduced MPLS Traffic engineering (TE). TE moves traffic to other parts of the network to underutilized sections.

While simple TE can be done with IGP metrics, they don’t satisfy unique traffic class requirements. Therefore, provider networks commonly deploy MPLS RSVP/ TE. This type of TE enhances IGP metric tuning, allowing engineers to forward core traffic over non-shortest paths. The non-shorted path is used to avoid network “hot spots.” Since the traffic is now moved to other underutilized network parts, it prevents the lengthy process of upgrading congested core links. MPLS TE distributes traffic optimally across a network. “MPLS RSVP/ TE is a widely adopted and well-defined technology. Can SDN and OpenFlow do a better job?”

Network Traffic Engineering
Diagram: Network traffic engineering.

Holistic visibility – Controller-based networking

MPLS/TE is a distributed architecture. There is no real-time global view of the end-to-end network path. The lack of a global view may induce incorrect traffic engineering decisions, lack of predictability, and deterministic scheduling of LSPs.

Some tools work with MPLS TE to create a holistic view, but they are usually expensive and do not offer a “real-time” picture. They often make an offline topology. They also don’t change the fact that MPLS is a distributed architecture.

The significant advantage of a centralized SDN and OpenFlow framework, commonly called MPLS OpenFlow, is that you have a holistic view of the network, controller-based networking. The centralized software sits on the controllers, analyzing and controlling the production network forwarding paths. It has a real-time network view and gains insights into various network analytics about link congestion, delay, latency, drops, and other performance metrics.

mpls openflow
Diagram: MPLS OpenFlow

MPLS OpenFlow can push down rules to the nodes per-flow basis, offering a granular approach to TE. The traditional TE mechanism is challenging in achieving a per-flow TE state. OpenFlow’s finer granularity is also evident in service insertion use casesIn addition, OpenFlow 1.4 supports better statistics that give you visibility into application performance.

This metric and a central viewpoint can only enhance traffic engineering decisions. Let’s face it: MPLS RSVP/TE, while widely deployed, involves several control plane protocols. All these protocols need to interact and work together.

The OpenFlow MPLS protocol steers traffic over MPLS using OpenFlow.

You can direct traffic from OpenFlow networks over MPLS LSP tunnel cross-connects and logical tunnel interfaces. By stitching OpenFlow interfaces to MPLS label-switched paths (LSPs), you can direct OpenFlow traffic onto MPLS networks. In addition, through MPLS LSP tunnel cross-connects between interfaces and LSPs, you can connect the OpenFlow network to a remote network by creating MPLS tunnels that use LSPs as conduits.

MPLS OpenFlow
Diagram: MPLS OpenFlow. The source is Juniper.

Network state vs. Centralized end-to-end visibility

RSVP requires that some state is stored on the Label Switch Router (LSR). The state is always bad for a network and imposes control plane scalability concerns. The network state is also a target for attack. Hierarchical RSVP was established to combat the state problem, but in my opinion, it adds to network complexity. All these kludges become an operational nightmare and require skilled staff to design, implement, and troubleshoot.

Removing MPLS signaling protocols from the network and the state they need to maintain eliminates some of the scale concerns with MPLS TE. Distributed control planes must maintain many tables and neighbor relationships (LSDB and TED). They all add to network complexity.

Predictable and deterministic TE solution

Using SDN and OpenFlow for traffic engineering provides a more predictable and deterministic TE solution. By informing the OpenFlow controller that you want the traffic redirected toward a specific MAC address, the necessary forwarding entries are programmed and automatically appear across the path. NETCONF and MPLS-TP are possibilities, but they operationally cause problems and don’t alleviate the distributed signaling protocols.

Having a central controller view, the contents of the network allow for particular network touchpoints. New features are implemented in the software and pushed down to the individual nodes. Similar to all SDN architectures, fewer network touchpoints increase network agility. The box-by-box and manual culture is slowly disappearing.

Challenges and Future Trends

Network traffic engineering faces several challenges, including ever-increasing data volumes, evolving network architectures, and the rise of new technologies such as cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT). However, emerging trends like Software-Defined Networking (SDN) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) are promising to address these challenges and optimize network traffic.

Summary: Network Traffic Engineering

Understanding Network Traffic Engineering

Network traffic engineering analyzes and manipulates traffic to enhance performance and meet specific objectives. It involves various techniques such as traffic shaping, route optimization, and load balancing. By intelligently managing the flow of data packets, network administrators can ensure optimal utilization of available bandwidth and minimize latency issues.

Traffic Engineering Techniques

Traffic Shaping

Traffic shaping is a technique used to control network traffic flow by enforcing predetermined bandwidth limits. It allows administrators to prioritize critical applications or services, ensuring smooth operation during peak traffic hours. By regulating the rate at which data packets are transmitted, traffic shaping helps prevent congestion and maintain a consistent user experience.

Route Optimization

Route optimization focuses on selecting the most efficient paths for data packets to travel across a network. Network engineers can determine the optimal routes that minimize delays and packet loss by analyzing various factors such as latency, bandwidth availability, and network topology. This ensures faster data transmission and improved overall network performance.

Load Balancing

Load balancing is a technique that distributes network traffic across multiple paths or devices, avoiding bottlenecks and optimizing resource utilization. By evenly distributing the workload, load balancers ensure that no single component is overwhelmed with traffic, thereby improving network efficiency and preventing congestion.

Benefits of Network Traffic Engineering

Enhanced Performance

By implementing traffic engineering techniques, network administrators can significantly enhance network performance. Reduced latency, improved throughput, and minimized packet loss contribute to a smoother and more efficient network operation.

Scalability and Flexibility

Network traffic engineering enables scalability and flexibility in network design. It allows for the efficient allocation of resources and the ability to adapt to changing traffic patterns and demands. This ensures that networks can handle increasing traffic volumes without sacrificing performance or user experience.

Effective Resource Utilization

Optimized network traffic engineering ensures that network resources are utilized effectively, maximizing the return on investment. By efficiently managing bandwidth and routing paths, organizations can avoid unnecessary expenses on additional infrastructure and improve overall cost-effectiveness.

Challenges and Considerations

While network traffic engineering offers numerous benefits, it also comes with its own set of challenges. Factors such as dynamic traffic patterns, evolving network technologies, and security considerations must be considered. Network administrators must stay updated with industry trends and continuously monitor and analyze network performance to address these challenges effectively.

Conclusion: Network traffic engineering is a critical discipline that ensures computer networks’ efficient and reliable functioning. By employing various techniques and protocols, network administrators can optimize resource utilization, enhance the quality of service, and pave the way for future network scalability. As technology evolves, staying updated with emerging trends and best practices in network traffic engineering will be crucial for organizations to maintain a competitive edge in today’s digital landscape.